Methods of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Guide Vancomycin Dosing Regimens: Trough Concentration versus Ratio of Area Under the Curve to Minimum Inhibitory Concentration.
{"title":"Methods of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Guide Vancomycin Dosing Regimens: Trough Concentration versus Ratio of Area Under the Curve to Minimum Inhibitory Concentration.","authors":"Ariane Du Sault, M. Parent, C. Simard","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe most recent vancomycin monitoring guideline recommends targeting a value for area under the curve (AUC) of 400 to 600 mg*h/L, with an assumed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1 mg/L. Few studies have investigated the effect of this method on vancomycin dosing regimens, relative to a target trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L.\n\n\nObjective\nTo compare vancomycin dosing regimens generated with the 2 monitoring methods.\n\n\nMethods\nThis retrospective chart review included hospitalized patients who received vancomycin between May 2019 and April 2020. The dosing regimens were compared, with the paired Student t test, in terms of unit dose, daily dose, and dosing interval. Variables of interest were collected from electronic medical charts. A pharmacy resident used first-order pharmacokinetic equations to determine dosing regimens based on AUC monitoring. Local pharmacists retrospectively determined dosing regimens for trough-based monitoring.\n\n\nResults\nOf 100 courses of treatment initially identified, 66 were included in the analysis. The unit dose was similar with the 2 methods (1086 mg with AUC-based monitoring versus 1100 mg with trough-based monitoring; p = 0.62). AUC monitoring was associated with a 12.8% lower daily dose (2294 mg versus 2630 mg; p < 0.001) and a 13.5% longer dosing interval (13.24 h versus 11.67 h; p < 0.001) relative to trough-based monitoring. AUC monitoring also generated a lower extrapolated trough concentration (12.90 mg/L versus 16.22 mg/L; p < 0.001).\n\n\nConclusions\nA target trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L was confirmed as being unnecessarily high. AUC monitoring could allow a reduction in daily vancomycin dose and an extension of the dosing interval relative to trough-based monitoring.","PeriodicalId":51646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","volume":"75 2 1","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background
The most recent vancomycin monitoring guideline recommends targeting a value for area under the curve (AUC) of 400 to 600 mg*h/L, with an assumed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1 mg/L. Few studies have investigated the effect of this method on vancomycin dosing regimens, relative to a target trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L.
Objective
To compare vancomycin dosing regimens generated with the 2 monitoring methods.
Methods
This retrospective chart review included hospitalized patients who received vancomycin between May 2019 and April 2020. The dosing regimens were compared, with the paired Student t test, in terms of unit dose, daily dose, and dosing interval. Variables of interest were collected from electronic medical charts. A pharmacy resident used first-order pharmacokinetic equations to determine dosing regimens based on AUC monitoring. Local pharmacists retrospectively determined dosing regimens for trough-based monitoring.
Results
Of 100 courses of treatment initially identified, 66 were included in the analysis. The unit dose was similar with the 2 methods (1086 mg with AUC-based monitoring versus 1100 mg with trough-based monitoring; p = 0.62). AUC monitoring was associated with a 12.8% lower daily dose (2294 mg versus 2630 mg; p < 0.001) and a 13.5% longer dosing interval (13.24 h versus 11.67 h; p < 0.001) relative to trough-based monitoring. AUC monitoring also generated a lower extrapolated trough concentration (12.90 mg/L versus 16.22 mg/L; p < 0.001).
Conclusions
A target trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L was confirmed as being unnecessarily high. AUC monitoring could allow a reduction in daily vancomycin dose and an extension of the dosing interval relative to trough-based monitoring.
期刊介绍:
The CJHP is an academic journal that focuses on how pharmacists in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings optimize safe and effective drug use for patients in Canada and throughout the world. The aim of the CJHP is to be a respected international publication serving as a major venue for dissemination of information related to patient-centred pharmacy practice in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings in Canada and throughout the world.