Methods of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Guide Vancomycin Dosing Regimens: Trough Concentration versus Ratio of Area Under the Curve to Minimum Inhibitory Concentration.

IF 0.6 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ariane Du Sault, M. Parent, C. Simard
{"title":"Methods of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Guide Vancomycin Dosing Regimens: Trough Concentration versus Ratio of Area Under the Curve to Minimum Inhibitory Concentration.","authors":"Ariane Du Sault, M. Parent, C. Simard","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe most recent vancomycin monitoring guideline recommends targeting a value for area under the curve (AUC) of 400 to 600 mg*h/L, with an assumed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1 mg/L. Few studies have investigated the effect of this method on vancomycin dosing regimens, relative to a target trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L.\n\n\nObjective\nTo compare vancomycin dosing regimens generated with the 2 monitoring methods.\n\n\nMethods\nThis retrospective chart review included hospitalized patients who received vancomycin between May 2019 and April 2020. The dosing regimens were compared, with the paired Student t test, in terms of unit dose, daily dose, and dosing interval. Variables of interest were collected from electronic medical charts. A pharmacy resident used first-order pharmacokinetic equations to determine dosing regimens based on AUC monitoring. Local pharmacists retrospectively determined dosing regimens for trough-based monitoring.\n\n\nResults\nOf 100 courses of treatment initially identified, 66 were included in the analysis. The unit dose was similar with the 2 methods (1086 mg with AUC-based monitoring versus 1100 mg with trough-based monitoring; p = 0.62). AUC monitoring was associated with a 12.8% lower daily dose (2294 mg versus 2630 mg; p < 0.001) and a 13.5% longer dosing interval (13.24 h versus 11.67 h; p < 0.001) relative to trough-based monitoring. AUC monitoring also generated a lower extrapolated trough concentration (12.90 mg/L versus 16.22 mg/L; p < 0.001).\n\n\nConclusions\nA target trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L was confirmed as being unnecessarily high. AUC monitoring could allow a reduction in daily vancomycin dose and an extension of the dosing interval relative to trough-based monitoring.","PeriodicalId":51646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","volume":"75 2 1","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background The most recent vancomycin monitoring guideline recommends targeting a value for area under the curve (AUC) of 400 to 600 mg*h/L, with an assumed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1 mg/L. Few studies have investigated the effect of this method on vancomycin dosing regimens, relative to a target trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L. Objective To compare vancomycin dosing regimens generated with the 2 monitoring methods. Methods This retrospective chart review included hospitalized patients who received vancomycin between May 2019 and April 2020. The dosing regimens were compared, with the paired Student t test, in terms of unit dose, daily dose, and dosing interval. Variables of interest were collected from electronic medical charts. A pharmacy resident used first-order pharmacokinetic equations to determine dosing regimens based on AUC monitoring. Local pharmacists retrospectively determined dosing regimens for trough-based monitoring. Results Of 100 courses of treatment initially identified, 66 were included in the analysis. The unit dose was similar with the 2 methods (1086 mg with AUC-based monitoring versus 1100 mg with trough-based monitoring; p = 0.62). AUC monitoring was associated with a 12.8% lower daily dose (2294 mg versus 2630 mg; p < 0.001) and a 13.5% longer dosing interval (13.24 h versus 11.67 h; p < 0.001) relative to trough-based monitoring. AUC monitoring also generated a lower extrapolated trough concentration (12.90 mg/L versus 16.22 mg/L; p < 0.001). Conclusions A target trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L was confirmed as being unnecessarily high. AUC monitoring could allow a reduction in daily vancomycin dose and an extension of the dosing interval relative to trough-based monitoring.
指导万古霉素给药方案的治疗药物监测方法:波谷浓度与曲线下面积与最小抑制浓度之比。
背景最新的万古霉素监测指南建议将曲线下面积(AUC)的值定为400至600 mg*h/L,假设最小抑制浓度(MIC)为1 mg/L。相对于15至20mg/L的目标谷浓度,很少有研究调查这种方法对万古霉素给药方案的影响。目的比较两种监测方法产生的万古霉素给药方案。方法这项回顾性图表回顾包括2019年5月至2020年4月期间接受万古霉素治疗的住院患者。根据单位剂量、日剂量和给药间隔,将给药方案与配对Student t检验进行比较。感兴趣的变量是从电子病历中收集的。一位药房居民使用一阶药代动力学方程,根据AUC监测确定给药方案。当地药剂师回顾性地确定了基于槽监测的给药方案。结果在最初确定的100个疗程中,66个疗程被纳入分析。单位剂量与两种方法相似(基于AUC的监测为1086 mg,而基于谷值的监测为1100 mg;p=0.62)。与基于谷值监测相比,AUC监测与日剂量降低12.8%(2294 mg对2630 mg;p<0.001)和给药间隔延长13.5%(13.24 h对11.67 h;p<001)相关。AUC监测也产生了较低的外推谷浓度(12.90 mg/L对16.22 mg/L;p<0.001)。结论15至20 mg/L的目标谷浓度被证实是不必要的高。与基于波谷的监测相比,AUC监测可以减少万古霉素的每日剂量并延长给药间隔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The CJHP is an academic journal that focuses on how pharmacists in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings optimize safe and effective drug use for patients in Canada and throughout the world. The aim of the CJHP is to be a respected international publication serving as a major venue for dissemination of information related to patient-centred pharmacy practice in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings in Canada and throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信