Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Policy on Inpatients Antibiotics Use

E. R. Manurung, H. Andriani
{"title":"Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Policy on Inpatients Antibiotics Use","authors":"E. R. Manurung, H. Andriani","doi":"10.15294/ujph.v11i2.49175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Exploration of Antimicrobial Consumption to Identify Targets for Quality Improvement in Indonesian Hospitals study showed that 97% of the use of empirical antibiotics was 81% empiric therapy, 12% medical prophylaxis, 4% surgical prophylaxis, and 16% without clear indications. The most common diagnoses are typhoid, pneumonia. and dengue fever. The Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme (ASP) Team supports the national program to reduce the use of irrational antibiotics. This study aims to analyse the ASP policy implementation on the use of antibiotics at the Royal Taruma Hospital. A secondary data on the use of Defined Daily Dose (DDD)/100 patient-days for the quarterly months of February, May, and August 2020. The 14 key informants' perceptions, opinions, thoughts are the primary data of qualitative research on the use of antibiotics during the ASP policy implementation. The three most antibiotics used were Ceftriaxone (64.7%), Levofloxacin (20.1%), and Meropenem (6.9%), which belong to the broad-spectrum antibiotic class. The total use of antibiotics was 1206.59 DDD/100 patient-days. The implementation of ASP policies has not been running optimally. It is necessary to formulate a pattern of germs and antimicrobial resistance, not only in the intensive room, but also in the care ward to achieve ASP quality indicators.","PeriodicalId":30840,"journal":{"name":"Unnes Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unnes Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ujph.v11i2.49175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Exploration of Antimicrobial Consumption to Identify Targets for Quality Improvement in Indonesian Hospitals study showed that 97% of the use of empirical antibiotics was 81% empiric therapy, 12% medical prophylaxis, 4% surgical prophylaxis, and 16% without clear indications. The most common diagnoses are typhoid, pneumonia. and dengue fever. The Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme (ASP) Team supports the national program to reduce the use of irrational antibiotics. This study aims to analyse the ASP policy implementation on the use of antibiotics at the Royal Taruma Hospital. A secondary data on the use of Defined Daily Dose (DDD)/100 patient-days for the quarterly months of February, May, and August 2020. The 14 key informants' perceptions, opinions, thoughts are the primary data of qualitative research on the use of antibiotics during the ASP policy implementation. The three most antibiotics used were Ceftriaxone (64.7%), Levofloxacin (20.1%), and Meropenem (6.9%), which belong to the broad-spectrum antibiotic class. The total use of antibiotics was 1206.59 DDD/100 patient-days. The implementation of ASP policies has not been running optimally. It is necessary to formulate a pattern of germs and antimicrobial resistance, not only in the intensive room, but also in the care ward to achieve ASP quality indicators.
住院患者抗菌药物管理计划政策分析
《探索抗菌药物消费以确定印尼医院质量改进目标》研究表明,97%的经验性抗生素使用是81%的经验性治疗,12%的药物预防,4%的手术预防,16%没有明确的指征。最常见的诊断是伤寒、肺炎。和登革热。抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)小组支持减少不合理抗生素使用的国家计划。本研究旨在分析皇家塔鲁马医院抗生素使用ASP政策的实施情况。2020年2月、5月和8月季度每日限定剂量(DDD)/100患者日使用情况的二次数据。14名关键信息提供者的感知、意见和想法是ASP政策实施过程中抗生素使用定性研究的主要数据。使用最多的三种抗生素是头孢曲松(64.7%)、左氧氟沙星(20.1%)和美罗培南(6.9%),属于广谱抗生素类。抗生素的总使用量为1206.59 DDD/100患者日。ASP策略的实施没有以最佳方式运行。有必要制定细菌和抗菌药物耐药性模式,不仅在重症监护室,而且在护理病房,以实现ASP质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书