Developing a computational ontology to understand the relational aspects of audience formation

Matthew Hanchard, P. Merrington, B. Wessels, Kathy Rogers, M. Pidd, Simeon J. Yates, David Forrest, A. Higson, Nathan Townsend, R. Smits
{"title":"Developing a computational ontology to understand the relational aspects of audience formation","authors":"Matthew Hanchard, P. Merrington, B. Wessels, Kathy Rogers, M. Pidd, Simeon J. Yates, David Forrest, A. Higson, Nathan Townsend, R. Smits","doi":"10.35241/emeraldopenres.13465.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we discuss an innovative audience research methodology developed for the AHRC-funded ‘Beyond the Multiplex: Audiences for Specialised Film in English Regions’ project (BtM). The project combines a computational ontology with a mixed-methods approach drawn from both the social sciences and the humanities, enabling research to be conducted both at scale and in depth, producing complex relational analyses of audiences. BtM aims to understand how we might enable a wide range of audiences to participate in a more diverse film culture, and embrace the wealth of films beyond the mainstream in order to optimise the cultural value of engaging with less familiar films. BtM collects data through a three-wave survey of film audience members’ practices, semi-structured interviews and film-elicitation groups with audience members alongside interviews with policy and industry experts, and analyses of key policy and industry documents. Bringing each of these datasets together within our ontology enables us to map relationships between them across a variety of different concerns. For instance, how cultural engagement in general relates to engagement with specialised films; how different audiences access and/or share films across different platforms and venues; how their engagement with those films enables them to make meaning and generate value; and how all of this is shaped by national and regional policy, film industry practices, and the decisions of cultural intermediaries across the fields of film production, distribution and exhibition. Alongside our analyses, the ontology enables us to produce data visualisations and a suite of analytical tools for audience development studies that stakeholders can use, ensuring the research has impact beyond the academy. This paper sets out our methodology for developing the BtM ontology, so that others may adapt it and develop their own ontologies from mixed-methods empirical data in their studies of other knowledge domains.","PeriodicalId":91015,"journal":{"name":"Emerald open research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13465.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we discuss an innovative audience research methodology developed for the AHRC-funded ‘Beyond the Multiplex: Audiences for Specialised Film in English Regions’ project (BtM). The project combines a computational ontology with a mixed-methods approach drawn from both the social sciences and the humanities, enabling research to be conducted both at scale and in depth, producing complex relational analyses of audiences. BtM aims to understand how we might enable a wide range of audiences to participate in a more diverse film culture, and embrace the wealth of films beyond the mainstream in order to optimise the cultural value of engaging with less familiar films. BtM collects data through a three-wave survey of film audience members’ practices, semi-structured interviews and film-elicitation groups with audience members alongside interviews with policy and industry experts, and analyses of key policy and industry documents. Bringing each of these datasets together within our ontology enables us to map relationships between them across a variety of different concerns. For instance, how cultural engagement in general relates to engagement with specialised films; how different audiences access and/or share films across different platforms and venues; how their engagement with those films enables them to make meaning and generate value; and how all of this is shaped by national and regional policy, film industry practices, and the decisions of cultural intermediaries across the fields of film production, distribution and exhibition. Alongside our analyses, the ontology enables us to produce data visualisations and a suite of analytical tools for audience development studies that stakeholders can use, ensuring the research has impact beyond the academy. This paper sets out our methodology for developing the BtM ontology, so that others may adapt it and develop their own ontologies from mixed-methods empirical data in their studies of other knowledge domains.
开发计算本体来理解受众形成的关系方面
在这篇文章中,我们讨论了一种创新的观众研究方法,该方法是为AHRC资助的“超越多元:英国地区专业电影的观众”项目(BtM)开发的。该项目将计算本体论与社会科学和人文科学的混合方法相结合,使研究能够在规模和深度上进行,对受众进行复杂的关系分析。BtM旨在了解我们如何让广泛的观众参与到更多元的电影文化中,并接受主流之外的丰富电影,以优化参与不太熟悉的电影的文化价值。BtM通过对电影观众实践的三波调查、对观众的半结构化采访和电影启发小组以及对政策和行业专家的采访以及对关键政策和行业文件的分析来收集数据。将这些数据集中的每一个放在我们的本体中,使我们能够跨各种不同的关注点映射它们之间的关系。例如,文化参与与专业电影的参与之间的关系;不同的观众如何在不同的平台和场所访问和/或分享电影;他们与这些电影的互动如何使他们产生意义和价值;以及这一切是如何由国家和地区政策、电影行业实践以及电影制作、发行和放映领域的文化中介机构的决定所形成的。除了我们的分析,本体论还使我们能够为受众发展研究生成数据可视化和一套分析工具,利益相关者可以使用这些工具,确保研究产生超出学院范围的影响。本文阐述了我们开发BtM本体的方法,以便其他人在研究其他知识领域时可以对其进行调整,并从混合方法经验数据中开发自己的本体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信