Identification of subpopulations of multipotent progenitor cells in hematopoietic stem-cell transplant patients using flow cytometry

IF 0.1 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Amera Elsayed, S. Youssef, M. Moussa, Y. ElSakhawy, D. Salem, Mariam K. Youssef
{"title":"Identification of subpopulations of multipotent progenitor cells in hematopoietic stem-cell transplant patients using flow cytometry","authors":"Amera Elsayed, S. Youssef, M. Moussa, Y. ElSakhawy, D. Salem, Mariam K. Youssef","doi":"10.4103/ejh.ejh_69_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The implemented flow-cytometric protocol for enumeration of CD34+ cells in bone marrow, peripheral, or cord blood addresses only CD34+ cells, irrespective of their distinct subsets. However, the definition of CD34+ different subsets has gained importance concerning the engraftment kinetics and immune reconstitution, after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Objectives This study aimed to describe and enumerate CD34 subpopulations, using a multicolor flow-cytometric protocol, based on the expression of CD133, SSEA-4, CD38, and CD10, in an attempt to explore the impact of the different CD34 subsets on engraftment kinetics, patient, and graft outcomes. Methods A total of 33 bone marrow transplant (25 autologous and 8 allogenic) Egyptian patients were included. Detailed demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, as well as echocardiography and pulmonary-function tests, were collected from all participants enrolled in the study, before transplantation. All patients were monitored up to 1 year post transplantation, for the development of complications. Discrimination of the distinct stem-cell subsets in the harvest was performed on NAVIOS flow cytometer, using multicolor FCM phenotyping. Results Seven CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell subpopulations were identified in the harvest blood by flow cytometry: the multipotent progenitor (MPP), erythromyeloid progenitor, B-lymphoid progenitor (BLP), multilymphoid progenitor (MLP), lymphomyeloid progenitor (LMPP), granulocyte and macrophage progenitor (GMP), and the late GMP. The MPP was the most frequently encountered subpopulation, whereas the BLP was the least-encountered one. In addition, the % population and absolute count of the late GMP were significantly higher after autologous transplantation (P=0.049 and 0.048, respectively). The absolute count of the MLP was significantly higher after G-CSG + chemotherapy-mobilization technique (P=0.039). Higher absolute count of the MLP in the harvest was associated with longer post-transplant 1-year survival of patients (P=0.025). The % population of the GMP in the harvest was significantly correlated with faster engraftment (P=0.039). However, a higher proportion of the late GMP (P=0.041and 0.028, respectively), along with higher absolute count of the LMPP, has been significantly encountered in patients who developed post-transplant disease relapse (P=0.050). By drawing a receiver-operating characteristic curve, only the size of the MPP population at cutoffs of ≤18.85% and ≤165312, respectively, could be significantly used to predict the persistence of cytopenia at 3 months after transplantation. Conclusion This study found that discrimination and quantification of the different CD34 stem-cell subsets might play a pivotal role for better understanding of engraftment kinetics and prediction of post-transplant graft and patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":42139,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Haematology","volume":"46 1","pages":"214 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejh.ejh_69_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The implemented flow-cytometric protocol for enumeration of CD34+ cells in bone marrow, peripheral, or cord blood addresses only CD34+ cells, irrespective of their distinct subsets. However, the definition of CD34+ different subsets has gained importance concerning the engraftment kinetics and immune reconstitution, after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Objectives This study aimed to describe and enumerate CD34 subpopulations, using a multicolor flow-cytometric protocol, based on the expression of CD133, SSEA-4, CD38, and CD10, in an attempt to explore the impact of the different CD34 subsets on engraftment kinetics, patient, and graft outcomes. Methods A total of 33 bone marrow transplant (25 autologous and 8 allogenic) Egyptian patients were included. Detailed demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, as well as echocardiography and pulmonary-function tests, were collected from all participants enrolled in the study, before transplantation. All patients were monitored up to 1 year post transplantation, for the development of complications. Discrimination of the distinct stem-cell subsets in the harvest was performed on NAVIOS flow cytometer, using multicolor FCM phenotyping. Results Seven CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell subpopulations were identified in the harvest blood by flow cytometry: the multipotent progenitor (MPP), erythromyeloid progenitor, B-lymphoid progenitor (BLP), multilymphoid progenitor (MLP), lymphomyeloid progenitor (LMPP), granulocyte and macrophage progenitor (GMP), and the late GMP. The MPP was the most frequently encountered subpopulation, whereas the BLP was the least-encountered one. In addition, the % population and absolute count of the late GMP were significantly higher after autologous transplantation (P=0.049 and 0.048, respectively). The absolute count of the MLP was significantly higher after G-CSG + chemotherapy-mobilization technique (P=0.039). Higher absolute count of the MLP in the harvest was associated with longer post-transplant 1-year survival of patients (P=0.025). The % population of the GMP in the harvest was significantly correlated with faster engraftment (P=0.039). However, a higher proportion of the late GMP (P=0.041and 0.028, respectively), along with higher absolute count of the LMPP, has been significantly encountered in patients who developed post-transplant disease relapse (P=0.050). By drawing a receiver-operating characteristic curve, only the size of the MPP population at cutoffs of ≤18.85% and ≤165312, respectively, could be significantly used to predict the persistence of cytopenia at 3 months after transplantation. Conclusion This study found that discrimination and quantification of the different CD34 stem-cell subsets might play a pivotal role for better understanding of engraftment kinetics and prediction of post-transplant graft and patient outcomes.
用流式细胞术鉴定造血干细胞移植患者的多能祖细胞亚群
背景:用于骨髓、外周血或脐带血中CD34+细胞计数的流式细胞术方案仅针对CD34+细胞,而不考虑其不同的亚群。然而,CD34+不同亚群的定义在造血干细胞移植后的移植动力学和免疫重建中变得越来越重要。本研究旨在基于CD133、SSEA-4、CD38和CD10的表达,使用多色流式细胞术描述和枚举CD34亚群,试图探索不同CD34亚群对移植动力学、患者和移植结果的影响。方法对33例接受骨髓移植的埃及患者(自体骨髓25例,同种异体骨髓8例)进行分析。详细的人口统计、临床和实验室数据,以及超声心动图和肺功能测试,都是在移植前收集的。所有患者在移植后随访1年,观察并发症的发生情况。在NAVIOS流式细胞仪上使用多色FCM分型对收获的不同干细胞亚群进行区分。结果流式细胞术在采血中鉴定出7个CD34+造血干细胞亚群:多能祖细胞(MPP)、红髓祖细胞、b淋巴祖细胞(BLP)、多淋巴祖细胞(MLP)、淋巴祖细胞(LMPP)、粒细胞和巨噬细胞祖细胞(GMP)和晚期GMP。MPP是最常遇到的亚群,而BLP是最少遇到的亚群。此外,自体移植后晚期GMP的百分比和绝对计数均显著高于自体移植(P=0.049和0.048)。G-CSG +化疗-动员技术后MLP绝对计数明显增高(P=0.039)。收获的MLP绝对计数越高,移植后患者的1年生存率越长(P=0.025)。收获中GMP的居群百分比与移栽速度显著相关(P=0.039)。然而,在移植后疾病复发的患者中,晚期GMP的比例更高(P=0.041和0.028),LMPP的绝对计数也更高(P=0.050)。通过绘制受体-工作特征曲线,只有分别在临界值≤18.85%和≤165312处的MPP群体的大小才能显著预测移植后3个月细胞减少的持续情况。结论本研究发现,区分和量化不同的CD34干细胞亚群可能对更好地理解移植动力学和预测移植后移植物和患者预后起关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信