Farahnooh Farnood, A. Mardomi, S. Zununi Vahed, M. Ardalan
{"title":"Prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates","authors":"Farahnooh Farnood, A. Mardomi, S. Zununi Vahed, M. Ardalan","doi":"10.34172/jrip.2022.32063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the standard gold therapy for the treatment of the majority of end-stage renal diseases (ESRDs). Despite the general success rate of allogeneic transplantation due to immunosuppressive therapy, it is difficult to find an appropriate donor for some sensitized patients. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and titers of anti-HLA-class I and anti-HLA-class II antibodies in sensitized patients in a kidney transplantation center. The history of the risk factors of sensitization was studied. Patients and Methods: Twenty highly sensitized ESRD patients with a calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) ≥50% were selected, and anti-HLA-I and anti-HLA-II antibodies were assessed in their sera using a single antigen bead (SAB) Luminex assay. Results: The previous history of kidney transplantation was the most critical sensitization risk factor. The results indicated that HLA A*24:02 and DQA1*02:01/DQB1*06:02 were the most frequent antibodies in class I and class II, respectively. Moreover, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) levels of anti-HLA class II antibodies were significantly higher than the MFI levels of anti-HLA class I antibodies. Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, matching HLA alleles, particularly class II molecules, can reduce sensitization in the first kidney transplant. A better understanding of the sensitization status of transplant candidates could be gained by examining CPRA values.","PeriodicalId":16950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Injury Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrip.2022.32063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the standard gold therapy for the treatment of the majority of end-stage renal diseases (ESRDs). Despite the general success rate of allogeneic transplantation due to immunosuppressive therapy, it is difficult to find an appropriate donor for some sensitized patients. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and titers of anti-HLA-class I and anti-HLA-class II antibodies in sensitized patients in a kidney transplantation center. The history of the risk factors of sensitization was studied. Patients and Methods: Twenty highly sensitized ESRD patients with a calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) ≥50% were selected, and anti-HLA-I and anti-HLA-II antibodies were assessed in their sera using a single antigen bead (SAB) Luminex assay. Results: The previous history of kidney transplantation was the most critical sensitization risk factor. The results indicated that HLA A*24:02 and DQA1*02:01/DQB1*06:02 were the most frequent antibodies in class I and class II, respectively. Moreover, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) levels of anti-HLA class II antibodies were significantly higher than the MFI levels of anti-HLA class I antibodies. Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, matching HLA alleles, particularly class II molecules, can reduce sensitization in the first kidney transplant. A better understanding of the sensitization status of transplant candidates could be gained by examining CPRA values.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Renal Injury Prevention (JRIP) is a quarterly peer-reviewed international journal devoted to the promotion of early diagnosis and prevention of renal diseases. It publishes in March, June, September and December of each year. It has pursued this aim through publishing editorials, original research articles, reviews, mini-reviews, commentaries, letters to the editor, hypothesis, case reports, epidemiology and prevention, news and views and renal biopsy teaching point. In this journal, particular emphasis is given to research, both experimental and clinical, aimed at protection/prevention of renal failure and modalities in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. A further aim of this journal is to emphasize and strengthen the link between renal pathologists/nephropathologists and nephrologists. In addition, JRIP welcomes basic biomedical as well as pharmaceutical scientific research applied to clinical nephrology. Futuristic conceptual hypothesis that integrate various fields of acute kidney injury and renal tubular cell protection are encouraged to be submitted.