Reshaping the Relationship between Environment and Development: A Theoretical Framework under the Paradigm of Eco-civilization and Its Policy Implications

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Yongsheng Zhang
{"title":"Reshaping the Relationship between Environment and Development: A Theoretical Framework under the Paradigm of Eco-civilization and Its Policy Implications","authors":"Yongsheng Zhang","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2023.2192086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigates the sustainability implications of the theoretical models of industrialization and urbanization pioneered by Dixit and Stiglitz 1 so to open the theoretical “black box” of the unsustainability of the traditional industrialization mode, and shows how to reshape the relationship between the environment and development under the paradigm of ecological civilization. It finds that the theoretical models that “perfectly” simulate the traditional industrialization mode all have the implicit consequence of environmental unsustainability. Nonetheless, this limitation is not due to the problems of the models themselves but is more a result of the limitations of the traditional developmental and neoclassical economics paradigms of the industrial era. Therefore, the consequences of unsustainability cannot simply be avoided through external policies such as technological progress and environmental regulations, nor can they be prevented by simply adjusting some parameters in these theoretical models. Instead, a shift is required in both the developmental and the economics paradigms formed in the traditional industrial era. From an ecological civilization perspective, this study rethinks the basic issues of economics along the two lines of the ends (what) and the means (how) of development; briefly reviews the history of economic thought; and uses a conceptual framework to reorganize the relevant intellectual profundities that are neglected in standard neoclassical economics. The study further formalizes the conceptual framework in a general form model and shows how a paradigm shift in development could shift the trade-offs from the multiple goals of the economy, the environment, and well-being in the traditional industrial era to mutual reinforcement in eco-civilization.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国社会科学","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2023.2192086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the sustainability implications of the theoretical models of industrialization and urbanization pioneered by Dixit and Stiglitz 1 so to open the theoretical “black box” of the unsustainability of the traditional industrialization mode, and shows how to reshape the relationship between the environment and development under the paradigm of ecological civilization. It finds that the theoretical models that “perfectly” simulate the traditional industrialization mode all have the implicit consequence of environmental unsustainability. Nonetheless, this limitation is not due to the problems of the models themselves but is more a result of the limitations of the traditional developmental and neoclassical economics paradigms of the industrial era. Therefore, the consequences of unsustainability cannot simply be avoided through external policies such as technological progress and environmental regulations, nor can they be prevented by simply adjusting some parameters in these theoretical models. Instead, a shift is required in both the developmental and the economics paradigms formed in the traditional industrial era. From an ecological civilization perspective, this study rethinks the basic issues of economics along the two lines of the ends (what) and the means (how) of development; briefly reviews the history of economic thought; and uses a conceptual framework to reorganize the relevant intellectual profundities that are neglected in standard neoclassical economics. The study further formalizes the conceptual framework in a general form model and shows how a paradigm shift in development could shift the trade-offs from the multiple goals of the economy, the environment, and well-being in the traditional industrial era to mutual reinforcement in eco-civilization.
重塑环境与发展的关系:生态文明范式下的理论框架及其政策启示
本文通过对迪克西特和斯蒂格利茨等人所开创的工业化和城市化理论模型的可持续性内涵进行考察,从而打开传统工业化模式不可持续性的理论“黑箱”,揭示在生态文明范式下如何重塑环境与发展的关系。研究发现,“完美”模拟传统工业化模式的理论模型都隐含着环境不可持续性的后果。然而,这种局限性并不是因为模型本身的问题,而是工业时代传统发展经济学范式和新古典经济学范式的局限性。因此,不可持续性的后果不能简单地通过技术进步和环境法规等外部政策来避免,也不能简单地通过调整这些理论模型中的一些参数来防止。相反,传统工业时代形成的发展模式和经济模式都需要转变。本研究从生态文明的视角出发,沿着发展的目的(什么)和手段(如何)两条线重新思考经济学的基本问题;简要回顾经济思想史;并使用一个概念框架来重新组织标准新古典经济学中被忽视的相关知识深度。该研究进一步将概念框架形式化为一般形式模型,并展示了发展模式的转变如何将权衡从传统工业时代的经济、环境和福祉的多重目标转变为生态文明的相互加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国社会科学
中国社会科学 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5101
期刊介绍: Social Sciences in China Press (SSCP) was established in 1979, directly under the administration of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). Currently, SSCP publishes seven journals, one academic newspaper and an English epaper .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信