Discussion on cable-strut systems of the suspen-dome structures

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Renjie Liu, Muqiao Li, Tianchen Cheng
{"title":"Discussion on cable-strut systems of the suspen-dome structures","authors":"Renjie Liu, Muqiao Li, Tianchen Cheng","doi":"10.1177/09560599221119042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the architectural requirements, the roof structure of a large-span gymnasium adopts the suspen-dome structure. In the scheme selection stage of the pre-stressed cable-strut system at the bottom part of the suspen-dome structure, a Levy-type scheme and a Loop-free scheme are established. The finite element models are established, and the static analysis under the design loads, the whole process analysis of load-displacement, and the dynamic response analysis after accidental cable break are carried out. The architectural expression of the two schemes are discussed. The component material consumption, the structural stiffness, the tension distribution characteristics, and the static bearing capacity of the two schemes are discussed. The failure mode and the progressive collapse resistance of the two schemes after accidental cable break are also discussed. The results show that the Loop-free scheme requires significantly less in terms of component material consumption than the Levy-type scheme. The static failure mode of the two schemes is strength failure, but the Loop-free scheme has greater bearing capacity. The Loop-free scheme has greater structural stiffness, lower cable forces, and uniformly distributed cable forces in each layer, and lower stress on the top reticulated shell members. Neither of the two schemes experience progressive collapse after accidental cable break. Due to the rupture in the loop cable of the Levy-type scheme, the rigidity of the rear region decreases greatly, and the cable force loss is large. On the contrary, internal force redistribution occurs in the Loop-free cable scheme and the cable force loss is not obvious, hence the progressive collapse resistance is better than that of the Levy-type scheme.","PeriodicalId":34964,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Space Structures","volume":"38 1","pages":"20 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Space Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09560599221119042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

According to the architectural requirements, the roof structure of a large-span gymnasium adopts the suspen-dome structure. In the scheme selection stage of the pre-stressed cable-strut system at the bottom part of the suspen-dome structure, a Levy-type scheme and a Loop-free scheme are established. The finite element models are established, and the static analysis under the design loads, the whole process analysis of load-displacement, and the dynamic response analysis after accidental cable break are carried out. The architectural expression of the two schemes are discussed. The component material consumption, the structural stiffness, the tension distribution characteristics, and the static bearing capacity of the two schemes are discussed. The failure mode and the progressive collapse resistance of the two schemes after accidental cable break are also discussed. The results show that the Loop-free scheme requires significantly less in terms of component material consumption than the Levy-type scheme. The static failure mode of the two schemes is strength failure, but the Loop-free scheme has greater bearing capacity. The Loop-free scheme has greater structural stiffness, lower cable forces, and uniformly distributed cable forces in each layer, and lower stress on the top reticulated shell members. Neither of the two schemes experience progressive collapse after accidental cable break. Due to the rupture in the loop cable of the Levy-type scheme, the rigidity of the rear region decreases greatly, and the cable force loss is large. On the contrary, internal force redistribution occurs in the Loop-free cable scheme and the cable force loss is not obvious, hence the progressive collapse resistance is better than that of the Levy-type scheme.
悬架穹顶结构索撑体系的探讨
根据建筑要求,大跨度体育馆屋面结构采用悬挑穹顶结构。在悬挑穹顶结构底部预应力索柱体系的方案选择阶段,建立了Levy型方案和无环方案。建立了有限元模型,进行了设计荷载作用下的静力分析、荷载位移全过程分析以及电缆意外断裂后的动力响应分析。讨论了两种方案的体系结构表达。讨论了两种方案的构件材料消耗、结构刚度、张力分布特性和静态承载力。文中还讨论了两种方案在电缆意外断裂后的破坏模式和渐进抗倒塌性能。结果表明,与Levy型方案相比,无环方案在部件材料消耗方面的要求明显更低。两种方案的静态破坏模式均为强度破坏,但无环方案的承载力较大。无环方案具有更大的结构刚度、更低的索力、每层索力均匀分布以及更低的顶部网壳构件应力。两种方案均未经历电缆意外断裂后的渐进式坍塌。由于Levy型方案的环索断裂,后部区域的刚度大大降低,索力损失较大。相反,无环索方案发生内力再分配,索力损失不明显,因此渐进抗倒塌性能优于Levy型方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Space Structures
International Journal of Space Structures Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide an international forum for the interchange of information on all aspects of analysis, design and construction of space structures. The scope of the journal encompasses structures such as single-, double- and multi-layer grids, barrel vaults, domes, towers, folded plates, radar dishes, tensegrity structures, stressed skin assemblies, foldable structures, pneumatic systems and cable arrangements. No limitation on the type of material is imposed and the scope includes structures constructed in steel, aluminium, timber, concrete, plastics, paperboard and fabric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信