Learning to Share: Outdoor Commercial Spaces on San Francisco's Valencia Street

Tyler Pullen, Michael Montilla
{"title":"Learning to Share: Outdoor Commercial Spaces on San Francisco's Valencia Street","authors":"Tyler Pullen, Michael Montilla","doi":"10.5070/bp332054155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of San Francisco sanctioned the use of public space on sidewalks and parking spaces for commercial use as part of their Shared Spaces initiative. Combined with streamlined permitting processes and an iterative rollout of design guidelines and inspections, the program facilitated a rapid and large-scale shift in the city’s streetscape. Using the Valencia Street commercial corridor in San Francisco’s Mission District as a case study area, we define and observe the “outdoor commercial spaces” (OCS) to present a preliminary typology based on degree of enclosure as a potential signifier of different patterns in use and perception of public space. We interview residents and other stakeholders to explore emerging themes in the perception of OCS, complemented by pedestrian path tracing along different sections of Valencia Street. Our findings indicate that differences in the degree of enclosure in OCS on Valencia Street partially reflect their diversity in use and business type. The limited interview data also suggests that individuals across all stakeholder groups generally believe OCS represent an improvement to public space even when more enclosed OCS imply the privatization of public space. Additionally, pedestrian behavior while the street is closed to vehicular traffic implies that the street closure is an important complement to OCS that maximizes the potential benefits of an activated streetscape while mitigating the negative effects and perceptions of privatization. However, these changes may amplify existing patterns of inclusion and exclusion in public spaces on Valencia Street. Especially as many OCS may become permanent fixtures of San Francisco’s streets, their design and purpose have important implications for street-level accessibility and city-wide equity for small businesses. These dynamics –and the OCS themselves –are likely to continue evolving during the transition to long-term guidelines and implementation.","PeriodicalId":39937,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Planning Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Planning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/bp332054155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of San Francisco sanctioned the use of public space on sidewalks and parking spaces for commercial use as part of their Shared Spaces initiative. Combined with streamlined permitting processes and an iterative rollout of design guidelines and inspections, the program facilitated a rapid and large-scale shift in the city’s streetscape. Using the Valencia Street commercial corridor in San Francisco’s Mission District as a case study area, we define and observe the “outdoor commercial spaces” (OCS) to present a preliminary typology based on degree of enclosure as a potential signifier of different patterns in use and perception of public space. We interview residents and other stakeholders to explore emerging themes in the perception of OCS, complemented by pedestrian path tracing along different sections of Valencia Street. Our findings indicate that differences in the degree of enclosure in OCS on Valencia Street partially reflect their diversity in use and business type. The limited interview data also suggests that individuals across all stakeholder groups generally believe OCS represent an improvement to public space even when more enclosed OCS imply the privatization of public space. Additionally, pedestrian behavior while the street is closed to vehicular traffic implies that the street closure is an important complement to OCS that maximizes the potential benefits of an activated streetscape while mitigating the negative effects and perceptions of privatization. However, these changes may amplify existing patterns of inclusion and exclusion in public spaces on Valencia Street. Especially as many OCS may become permanent fixtures of San Francisco’s streets, their design and purpose have important implications for street-level accessibility and city-wide equity for small businesses. These dynamics –and the OCS themselves –are likely to continue evolving during the transition to long-term guidelines and implementation.
学会分享:旧金山巴伦西亚街的户外商业空间
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,旧金山市批准将人行道和停车位上的公共空间用于商业用途,作为其共享空间倡议的一部分。结合简化的许可流程和设计指南和检查的迭代推出,该计划促进了城市街道景观的快速和大规模转变。我们以旧金山教会区的瓦伦西亚街商业走廊为案例研究区域,定义并观察了“户外商业空间”(OCS),以圈闭程度为基础,提出了一个初步的类型学,作为不同使用模式和公共空间感知的潜在标志。我们采访了居民和其他利益相关者,以探索OCS感知中的新兴主题,并通过沿着瓦伦西亚街不同部分的步行路径进行补充。研究结果表明,瓦伦西亚街OCS的封闭程度差异部分反映了其用途和商业类型的多样性。有限的访谈数据还表明,所有利益相关者群体的个人普遍认为OCS代表了公共空间的改善,即使更封闭的OCS意味着公共空间的私有化。此外,当街道对车辆交通关闭时,行人的行为意味着街道关闭是OCS的重要补充,可以最大限度地发挥激活街景的潜在好处,同时减轻私有化的负面影响和看法。然而,这些变化可能会放大瓦伦西亚街公共空间中现有的包容和排斥模式。特别是由于许多OCS可能成为旧金山街道的永久固定设施,它们的设计和用途对街道可达性和全市范围内小企业的公平具有重要意义。在向长期指导方针和实施过渡的过程中,这些动态——以及OCS本身——可能会继续演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Berkeley Planning Journal
Berkeley Planning Journal Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Berkeley Planning Journal is an annual peer-reviewed journal, published by graduate students in the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the University of California, Berkeley since 1985.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信