The correlation of ground reaction forces between different simplified pressure sensor layouts and the full layout in flatfoot

IF 2.7 Q2 ERGONOMICS
Wei-Han Chen, Ping-Hung Lee, W. Hsu, T. Shiang
{"title":"The correlation of ground reaction forces between different simplified pressure sensor layouts and the full layout in flatfoot","authors":"Wei-Han Chen, Ping-Hung Lee, W. Hsu, T. Shiang","doi":"10.1080/19424280.2023.2199273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ground reaction forces (GRF) is an important gait parameter related to load and injury risk (Lidstone et al., 2017), especially for people with flat foot. Wearable in-shoe pressure systems are widely used to measure GRF because they are not space restricted and allow for participants’ free movement (Fuchs et al., 2022). To facilitate clinical application, researchers attempted to develop a simplified system with a reduced number of sensors without impacting data validity (Fuchs et al., 2022). Previous study showed that the simplified in-shoe pressure system with 11 sensors was the optimal compromise between simplification and measurement performance (Fuchs et al., 2022). However, the study only validated eight layouts with different number of sensors (3-17 sensors). It was unclear whether there were better layouts with same of sensors (11 sensors). Furthermore, the validity of simplified in-shoe pressure system with 11 sensors in flat foot has not been verified.","PeriodicalId":45905,"journal":{"name":"Footwear Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"S37 - S38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Footwear Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2023.2199273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ground reaction forces (GRF) is an important gait parameter related to load and injury risk (Lidstone et al., 2017), especially for people with flat foot. Wearable in-shoe pressure systems are widely used to measure GRF because they are not space restricted and allow for participants’ free movement (Fuchs et al., 2022). To facilitate clinical application, researchers attempted to develop a simplified system with a reduced number of sensors without impacting data validity (Fuchs et al., 2022). Previous study showed that the simplified in-shoe pressure system with 11 sensors was the optimal compromise between simplification and measurement performance (Fuchs et al., 2022). However, the study only validated eight layouts with different number of sensors (3-17 sensors). It was unclear whether there were better layouts with same of sensors (11 sensors). Furthermore, the validity of simplified in-shoe pressure system with 11 sensors in flat foot has not been verified.
不同简化压力传感器布置方式与平足全布置方式对地面反作用力的相关性
地面反作用力(Ground reaction forces, GRF)是与负荷和损伤风险相关的重要步态参数(Lidstone et al., 2017),尤其对于平足患者而言。可穿戴式鞋内压力系统被广泛用于测量GRF,因为它们不受空间限制,允许参与者自由活动(Fuchs et al., 2022)。为了促进临床应用,研究人员试图开发一种简化的系统,减少传感器数量,同时不影响数据有效性(Fuchs et al., 2022)。先前的研究表明,具有11个传感器的简化鞋内压力系统是简化和测量性能之间的最佳折衷(Fuchs et al., 2022)。然而,该研究仅验证了8种不同传感器数量的布局(3-17个传感器)。目前尚不清楚是否有更好的布局与相同的传感器(11个传感器)。此外,还没有验证包含11个传感器的简化平足鞋内压力系统的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Footwear Science
Footwear Science ERGONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信