The Mangbaerye Examinations: Ming Loyalist Court Rituals and Royal Authority in Eighteenth-and Nineteenth-Century Chosŏn

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Seunghyun Han
{"title":"The Mangbaerye Examinations: Ming Loyalist Court Rituals and Royal Authority in Eighteenth-and Nineteenth-Century Chosŏn","authors":"Seunghyun Han","doi":"10.1215/07311613-9474266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:During the reigns of Yŏngjo (r. 1724–76) and Chŏngjo (r. 1776–1800), royal audiences and tests were established as important components of the mangbaerye-day events. For the two rulers, the audience was an occasion to use the significance of the rituals to justify bureaucratic promotions for the attendees. The literary and military tests on mangbaerye days were systematized by Yŏngjo and administered by the ruler as a stage in the state examination. By assuming leading ideological roles through rituals, Yŏngjo was able to present the image of a sage-ruler with supreme political and ideological authority. Chŏngjo refrained from bestowing examination privileges in the mangbaerye tests, making the mangbaerye days special occasions for disseminating Ming loyalism. In the nineteenth century, the frequency of Ming loyalist rituals was significantly reduced, and royal audiences came to a complete halt. Moreover, the rituals incrementally lost ground as events for highlighting the importance of the ritual attendees. The mangbaerye-day tests in the nineteenth century served as a venue to promote participating families' political advancement, rather than as an occasion to bolster the monarchical authority and power.","PeriodicalId":43322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"3 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/07311613-9474266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:During the reigns of Yŏngjo (r. 1724–76) and Chŏngjo (r. 1776–1800), royal audiences and tests were established as important components of the mangbaerye-day events. For the two rulers, the audience was an occasion to use the significance of the rituals to justify bureaucratic promotions for the attendees. The literary and military tests on mangbaerye days were systematized by Yŏngjo and administered by the ruler as a stage in the state examination. By assuming leading ideological roles through rituals, Yŏngjo was able to present the image of a sage-ruler with supreme political and ideological authority. Chŏngjo refrained from bestowing examination privileges in the mangbaerye tests, making the mangbaerye days special occasions for disseminating Ming loyalism. In the nineteenth century, the frequency of Ming loyalist rituals was significantly reduced, and royal audiences came to a complete halt. Moreover, the rituals incrementally lost ground as events for highlighting the importance of the ritual attendees. The mangbaerye-day tests in the nineteenth century served as a venue to promote participating families' political advancement, rather than as an occasion to bolster the monarchical authority and power.
《Mangbaerye科举:十八、十九世纪明朝的宫廷礼仪与王权》Chosŏn
摘要:Yŏngjo(1724 - 1776年)和Chŏngjo(1776-1800年)在位期间,将御祭和御试确立为芒芒节活动的重要组成部分。对这两位统治者来说,觐见是一个机会,可以利用仪式的重要性,为出席者的官阶晋升辩护。mangbaerye的文学和军事考试是通过Yŏngjo系统化的,由统治者管理,作为国家考试的一个阶段。Yŏngjo通过仪式扮演了意识形态的主导角色,展现了具有最高政治权威和意识形态权威的圣贤统治者的形象。Chŏngjo禁止在官场考试中授予考试特权,使官场日成为传播明朝忠诚的特殊场合。到了19世纪,明朝忠君仪式的频次明显减少,皇室观众完全停止了。此外,作为强调仪式参与者重要性的活动,仪式逐渐失去了地位。19世纪的芒果日考试是促进参与家庭政治进步的场所,而不是作为加强君主权威和权力的场合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信