Linguistic diversity as a challenge and an opportunity for improved legal policy

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW
A. Grey, L. Smith-Khan
{"title":"Linguistic diversity as a challenge and an opportunity for improved legal policy","authors":"A. Grey, L. Smith-Khan","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2021.1996883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article introduces this Themed Issue, Linguistic Diversity as a Challenge to Legal Policy, and reports a small, peer-reviewed study of the integration of research about language issues in legal contexts in Australian legal education. The article explains that interdisciplinary law and linguistics research has emerged to better understand potential inequalities and injustices. This research speaks to concerns shared across many legal systems because both multilingualism and inter-lingual prejudice are common phenomena across nations. The Themed Issue's eleven contributions draw scholarly attention to specific, current problems in legal contexts which relate to language practices and/or policies about language, arranged around the familiar three branches of the state (legislature, executive, judiciary). The Themed Issue is aimed at endowing readers with motivation and basic knowledge to tread new, language-aware routes towards solutions based on collaborative research and policy reform. In regards to integrating such research into legal education, our NSW and ACT study found few course offerings which focus on an intersection of linguistic and legal scholarship. We therefore suggest the development of electives or the inclusion of such material in core subjects (timely given the ‘Priestly 11’ compulsory subjects are under review at the time of writing).","PeriodicalId":45376,"journal":{"name":"Griffith Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Griffith Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.1996883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article introduces this Themed Issue, Linguistic Diversity as a Challenge to Legal Policy, and reports a small, peer-reviewed study of the integration of research about language issues in legal contexts in Australian legal education. The article explains that interdisciplinary law and linguistics research has emerged to better understand potential inequalities and injustices. This research speaks to concerns shared across many legal systems because both multilingualism and inter-lingual prejudice are common phenomena across nations. The Themed Issue's eleven contributions draw scholarly attention to specific, current problems in legal contexts which relate to language practices and/or policies about language, arranged around the familiar three branches of the state (legislature, executive, judiciary). The Themed Issue is aimed at endowing readers with motivation and basic knowledge to tread new, language-aware routes towards solutions based on collaborative research and policy reform. In regards to integrating such research into legal education, our NSW and ACT study found few course offerings which focus on an intersection of linguistic and legal scholarship. We therefore suggest the development of electives or the inclusion of such material in core subjects (timely given the ‘Priestly 11’ compulsory subjects are under review at the time of writing).
语言多样性是改进法律政策的挑战和机遇
本文介绍了“语言多样性是对法律政策的挑战”这一主题问题,并报告了一项小型同行评议的研究,该研究将澳大利亚法律教育中法律背景下的语言问题整合起来。文章解释说,跨学科的法律和语言学研究 已经出现,以更好地理解潜在的不平等和不公正。这项研究反映了许多法律体系共同关注的问题,因为使用多种语言和语言间偏见是各国普遍存在的现象。《主题问题》的11篇文章将学者的注意力集中在与语言实践和/或语言政策有关的法律背景中具体的、当前的问题上,这些问题围绕着国家熟悉的三个部门(立法、行政、司法)进行安排。主题问题旨在为读者提供动力和基本知识,以便在合作研究和政策改革的基础上,探索新的、有语言意识的解决方案。关于将此类研究整合到法律教育中,我们在新南威尔士州和澳大利亚首都领地的研究发现,很少有课程侧重于语言学和法律学术的交叉。因此,我们建议开发选修课或将此类材料纳入核心科目(及时考虑到“祭司11”必修科目在撰写本文时正在审查中)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信