Religious “Nones” and Onto-Epistemic Socialization: Problematizing Participant Self-Identification in Research on Religious Identity

S. Edwards
{"title":"Religious “Nones” and Onto-Epistemic Socialization: Problematizing Participant Self-Identification in Research on Religious Identity","authors":"S. Edwards","doi":"10.1080/2194587X.2021.1977150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article problematizes the practice of relying on participant self-identification in research on religious, secular, and spiritual identity (RSSI) within the field of higher education, with particular attention to the implications related to participants who chose non-religious labels. While this practice is commonplace in the field, it is rooted in Western/Christian assumptions about foundational concepts such as self, agency, knowledge, and religion. The article describes alternative understandings of these concepts in order to point out the onto-epistemic biases present in existing higher education RSSI research. It goes on to share descriptive data about “non-religious” students from a qualitative study on RSSI themed intergroup dialogue courses. The way these students understood, and sometimes struggled with, the concepts of self, agency, knowledge, and religion illustrates why and how the exclusive reliance on RSSI self-identification can ultimately lead to the erasure of religious minorities and the perpetuation of a hegemonic Western/Christian-centric worldview.","PeriodicalId":89967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of college and character","volume":"22 1","pages":"291 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of college and character","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587X.2021.1977150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article problematizes the practice of relying on participant self-identification in research on religious, secular, and spiritual identity (RSSI) within the field of higher education, with particular attention to the implications related to participants who chose non-religious labels. While this practice is commonplace in the field, it is rooted in Western/Christian assumptions about foundational concepts such as self, agency, knowledge, and religion. The article describes alternative understandings of these concepts in order to point out the onto-epistemic biases present in existing higher education RSSI research. It goes on to share descriptive data about “non-religious” students from a qualitative study on RSSI themed intergroup dialogue courses. The way these students understood, and sometimes struggled with, the concepts of self, agency, knowledge, and religion illustrates why and how the exclusive reliance on RSSI self-identification can ultimately lead to the erasure of religious minorities and the perpetuation of a hegemonic Western/Christian-centric worldview.
宗教“无者”与本体-认知社会化:宗教认同研究中参与者自我认同的问题化
摘要本文对高等教育领域中在宗教、世俗和精神认同(RSSI)研究中依赖参与者自我认同的做法提出了质疑,并特别关注了与选择非宗教标签的参与者相关的影响。虽然这种做法在该领域很常见,但它植根于西方/基督教对自我、能动性、知识和宗教等基本概念的假设。本文描述了对这些概念的不同理解,以指出现有高等教育RSSI研究中存在的认知偏差。它还分享了一项以RSSI为主题的小组间对话课程的定性研究中关于“非宗教”学生的描述性数据。这些学生理解自我、代理、知识和宗教概念的方式,有时也会与之斗争,这说明了为什么以及如何完全依赖RSSI自我认同,最终会导致宗教少数群体的消失,并使霸权主义的西方/基督教中心世界观永久化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书