Autism-Spectrum Quotient Is Associated with Observational Skill Acquisition in Healthy Young Adults

Yoichiro Sato, Kento Kageyama
{"title":"Autism-Spectrum Quotient Is Associated with Observational Skill Acquisition in Healthy Young Adults","authors":"Yoichiro Sato, Kento Kageyama","doi":"10.4236/jbbs.2020.104011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although observational motor learning is one method of skill acquisition, this type of motor learning is not equally effective for all individuals. To clarify factors associated with the effectiveness of motor learning, we examined the association between model-observational skill acquisition and the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ), which is reportedly associated with motor learning via visual information. Twenty healthy adults performed the Kendama task. The participants practiced under three conditions: using their own methods (self), following observation of model actions (model-observation), and following observation of their own actions (self-observation). Measurement trials were performed 20 times prior to self-practice sessions and after each practice session. Success ratios were calculated for each measurement trial. All participants completed the AQ. The difference in success ratios for measurement sessions following practices between the self and model-observation conditions was significantly negatively correlated with AQ scores. Individuals with low AQ values can more easily acquire skills via model-observational motor learning than those with relatively higher AQ values.","PeriodicalId":69804,"journal":{"name":"行为与脑科学期刊(英文)","volume":"10 1","pages":"179-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"行为与脑科学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jbbs.2020.104011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although observational motor learning is one method of skill acquisition, this type of motor learning is not equally effective for all individuals. To clarify factors associated with the effectiveness of motor learning, we examined the association between model-observational skill acquisition and the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ), which is reportedly associated with motor learning via visual information. Twenty healthy adults performed the Kendama task. The participants practiced under three conditions: using their own methods (self), following observation of model actions (model-observation), and following observation of their own actions (self-observation). Measurement trials were performed 20 times prior to self-practice sessions and after each practice session. Success ratios were calculated for each measurement trial. All participants completed the AQ. The difference in success ratios for measurement sessions following practices between the self and model-observation conditions was significantly negatively correlated with AQ scores. Individuals with low AQ values can more easily acquire skills via model-observational motor learning than those with relatively higher AQ values.
健康青年孤独症谱系商与观察技能习得的关系
虽然观察运动学习是一种技能习得方法,但这种类型的运动学习并不是对所有人都同样有效。为了澄清与运动学习有效性相关的因素,我们研究了模型观察技能习得与自闭症谱系商(AQ)之间的关系,据报道,AQ与通过视觉信息进行的运动学习有关。20名健康成年人完成了Kendama任务。参与者在三种情况下进行练习:使用自己的方法(自我),随后观察模型动作(模型观察)和随后观察自己的动作(自我观察)。在自我练习前和每次练习后分别进行20次测量试验。计算每个测量试验的成功率。所有被试均完成了问卷测验。自我条件和模型观察条件在实践后测量环节的成功率差异与问卷测验得分呈显著负相关。低智商个体比高智商个体更容易通过模型观察动作学习获得技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
424
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信