Effect of lime source, fineness and granulation on neutralisation of soil pH

IF 1.1 Q3 AGRONOMY
D. Du Toit, P. Swanepoel, A. Hardie
{"title":"Effect of lime source, fineness and granulation on neutralisation of soil pH","authors":"D. Du Toit, P. Swanepoel, A. Hardie","doi":"10.1080/02571862.2022.2043470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little information is available regarding the liming efficiency of various local lime sources and products currently available in South Africa. Recently, granulated micro-fine limes are being widely marketed as being superior to class A limes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various local, commercially available hydrated, calcitic and dolomitic lime sources (i.e., from different quarries) and forms (class A, micro-fine and granulated micro-fine) at increasing soil pH over time (365 days) under controlled conditions in two contrasting acid soils (sand and loam). Liming materials were applied adjusted for calcium carbonate equivalence (CCE) to achieve a target pHKCl of 5.5 and incubated at 85% field capacity. Micro-fine calcitic limes and hydrated limes increased pH the fastest (first 30–60 days), but the difference between these materials and class A limes attenuated over time. The difference in performance between class A limes was relatively minor (0.5 pH units), if applied based on CCE. Chemical purity (Ca%, CCE) was the main factor controlling liming effectiveness and particle fineness only related to the short-term reaction (4–7 days). Granulated limes showed the poorest performance in terms of pH correction attributed to poor solubility and spatial zonation of liming effects.","PeriodicalId":21920,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2022.2043470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Little information is available regarding the liming efficiency of various local lime sources and products currently available in South Africa. Recently, granulated micro-fine limes are being widely marketed as being superior to class A limes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various local, commercially available hydrated, calcitic and dolomitic lime sources (i.e., from different quarries) and forms (class A, micro-fine and granulated micro-fine) at increasing soil pH over time (365 days) under controlled conditions in two contrasting acid soils (sand and loam). Liming materials were applied adjusted for calcium carbonate equivalence (CCE) to achieve a target pHKCl of 5.5 and incubated at 85% field capacity. Micro-fine calcitic limes and hydrated limes increased pH the fastest (first 30–60 days), but the difference between these materials and class A limes attenuated over time. The difference in performance between class A limes was relatively minor (0.5 pH units), if applied based on CCE. Chemical purity (Ca%, CCE) was the main factor controlling liming effectiveness and particle fineness only related to the short-term reaction (4–7 days). Granulated limes showed the poorest performance in terms of pH correction attributed to poor solubility and spatial zonation of liming effects.
石灰来源、细度和造粒对土壤pH值中和的影响
目前,关于南非各种当地石灰来源和产品的石灰化效率的信息很少。近年来,颗粒状微细石灰作为优于A类石灰的产品被广泛销售。因此,本研究的目的是比较在两种不同的酸性土壤(砂和壤土)的受控条件下,各种本地的、市售的水合石灰、钙质石灰和白云岩石灰来源(即来自不同采石场)和形式(A类、微细粒和粒状微细粒)随时间(365天)增加土壤pH值的有效性。采用碳酸钙当量(CCE)调整后的石灰材料,以达到pHKCl为5.5的目标,并在85%的现场容量下孵育。微细钙质石灰和水合石灰的pH值增长最快(前30-60天),但随着时间的推移,这些材料与A类石灰之间的差异逐渐减弱。如果基于CCE应用,A类石灰的性能差异相对较小(0.5 pH单位)。化学纯度(Ca%, CCE)是石灰化效果的主要控制因素,颗粒细度仅与短期反应(4 ~ 7 d)有关。颗粒石灰的pH校正效果最差,主要是由于溶解度差和石灰效果的空间分带性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Journal of Plant and Soil
South African Journal of Plant and Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal has a proud history of publishing quality papers in the fields of applied plant and soil sciences and has, since its inception, recorded a vast body of scientific information with particular reference to South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信