Association of Remnant-like Particle Cholesterol with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Subjects with Different Levels of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin 9: A 9.5-year Follow-up Study in a Beijing Community Population

Xiaona Wang, Ruping Tie, R. Cao, Xu Yang, W. Xiao, L. Sheng, Ping Ye
{"title":"Association of Remnant-like Particle Cholesterol with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Subjects with Different Levels of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin 9: A 9.5-year Follow-up Study in a Beijing Community Population","authors":"Xiaona Wang, Ruping Tie, R. Cao, Xu Yang, W. Xiao, L. Sheng, Ping Ye","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with different levels of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9). Methods: From September 2007 to January 2009, 1,859 subjects in Pingguoyuan communities in Beijing were initially screened. After excluding those with bedridden status, mental illness, severe systemic diseases, and missing data, 1,680 subjects were recruited for follow up. All recruited subjects were followed up from February 2013 to September 2013 (181 subjects were lost to follow-up) and from June 2017 to September 2018 (174 subjects were lost to follow up). Finally, 1,325 subjects were included in the study. General demographic characteristics, lifestyle and behaviors, disease history and use of medication was collected. Levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fast blood glucose, RLP-C, low-density lipoprotein triglycerides and PCSK9 were measured. The levels of RLP-C (low: RLP-C ≤ 157 mg/L; high: RLP-C > 157 mg/L) and PCSK9 (low: PCSK9 ≤ 135.87 μg/L; high: PCSK9 > 135.87 μg/L) were represented using quartiles. Subjects were categorized into 4 groups according to their RLP-C and PCSK9 levels: Q4, high levels of RLP-C with high levels of PCSK9; Q3, high levels of RLP-C with low levels of PCSK9; Q2, low levels of RLP-C with high levels of PCSK9; and Q1, low levels of RLP-C with low levels of PCSK9. The association of RLP-C with MACEs in subjects with different PCSK9 levels was evaluated. Results: After a median follow-up of 9.5 years, 1,325 subjects were included in the study and a total of 191 MACEs had occurred. The incidence of MACEs was higher in the RLP-C > 157 mg/L group than the RLP-C ≤ 157 mg/L group (18.40% vs. 10.42%). Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis showed that increased RLP-C levels were associated with an increased risk of MACEs (hazard ratio: 1.405; 95% confidence interval: 1.005–1.964; P < 0.005). The incidence of MACEs was higher in the high RLP-C/PCSK9 group vs. the low RLP-C/PCSK9 group (20.68% vs. 8.76%). Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis showed that RLP-C was associated with an increased risk of MACEs in subjects with high PCSK9 levels independent of traditional risk factors (hazard ratio: 1.791; 95% confidence interval: 1.168–2.825; P = 0.001), but not in those with low PCSK9 levels. Conclusions: RLP-C was identified as a risk factor for MACEs, particularly in subjects with high PCSK9 levels. Lowering PCSK9 levels may reduce residual risk in subjects with elevated plasma RLP-C levels.","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with different levels of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9). Methods: From September 2007 to January 2009, 1,859 subjects in Pingguoyuan communities in Beijing were initially screened. After excluding those with bedridden status, mental illness, severe systemic diseases, and missing data, 1,680 subjects were recruited for follow up. All recruited subjects were followed up from February 2013 to September 2013 (181 subjects were lost to follow-up) and from June 2017 to September 2018 (174 subjects were lost to follow up). Finally, 1,325 subjects were included in the study. General demographic characteristics, lifestyle and behaviors, disease history and use of medication was collected. Levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fast blood glucose, RLP-C, low-density lipoprotein triglycerides and PCSK9 were measured. The levels of RLP-C (low: RLP-C ≤ 157 mg/L; high: RLP-C > 157 mg/L) and PCSK9 (low: PCSK9 ≤ 135.87 μg/L; high: PCSK9 > 135.87 μg/L) were represented using quartiles. Subjects were categorized into 4 groups according to their RLP-C and PCSK9 levels: Q4, high levels of RLP-C with high levels of PCSK9; Q3, high levels of RLP-C with low levels of PCSK9; Q2, low levels of RLP-C with high levels of PCSK9; and Q1, low levels of RLP-C with low levels of PCSK9. The association of RLP-C with MACEs in subjects with different PCSK9 levels was evaluated. Results: After a median follow-up of 9.5 years, 1,325 subjects were included in the study and a total of 191 MACEs had occurred. The incidence of MACEs was higher in the RLP-C > 157 mg/L group than the RLP-C ≤ 157 mg/L group (18.40% vs. 10.42%). Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis showed that increased RLP-C levels were associated with an increased risk of MACEs (hazard ratio: 1.405; 95% confidence interval: 1.005–1.964; P < 0.005). The incidence of MACEs was higher in the high RLP-C/PCSK9 group vs. the low RLP-C/PCSK9 group (20.68% vs. 8.76%). Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis showed that RLP-C was associated with an increased risk of MACEs in subjects with high PCSK9 levels independent of traditional risk factors (hazard ratio: 1.791; 95% confidence interval: 1.168–2.825; P = 0.001), but not in those with low PCSK9 levels. Conclusions: RLP-C was identified as a risk factor for MACEs, particularly in subjects with high PCSK9 levels. Lowering PCSK9 levels may reduce residual risk in subjects with elevated plasma RLP-C levels.
不同蛋白转化酶枯草菌素/可新9水平人群中残余样颗粒胆固醇与主要不良心血管事件的关系:北京社区人群9.5年随访研究
目的:本研究旨在探讨不同水平枯草杆菌蛋白转化酶(PCSK9)患者的残余样颗粒胆固醇(RLP-C)与主要不良心血管事件(mace)的关系。方法:2007年9月至2009年1月,在北京市平果园社区对1859名受试者进行初步筛选。在排除卧床、精神疾病、严重全身性疾病和缺失数据后,招募1680名受试者进行随访。所有招募的受试者于2013年2月至2013年9月(181名受试者失去随访)和2017年6月至2018年9月(174名受试者失去随访)进行随访。最后,1325名受试者被纳入研究。收集一般人口学特征、生活方式和行为、疾病史和用药情况。测定总胆固醇、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、空腹血糖、RLP-C、低密度脂蛋白甘油三酯、PCSK9水平。RLP-C水平(低:RLP-C≤157 mg/L;高:RLP-C > 157 mg/L)和PCSK9(低:PCSK9≤135.87 μg/L;高:PCSK9 bb0 135.87 μg/L)用四分位数表示。根据受试者的RLP-C和PCSK9水平分为4组:Q4组,高水平RLP-C和高水平PCSK9;Q3, RLP-C水平高,PCSK9水平低;Q2,低水平RLP-C伴高水平PCSK9;Q1,低水平RLP-C和低水平PCSK9。评估不同PCSK9水平受试者的RLP-C与mace的关系。结果:中位随访9.5年,1325名受试者纳入研究,共发生191例mace。RLP-C浓度低于157 mg/L组mace发生率高于RLP-C≤157 mg/L组(18.40% vs. 10.42%)。Cox比例风险回归模型分析显示,RLP-C水平升高与mace风险增加相关(风险比:1.405;95%置信区间:1.005-1.964;P < 0.005)。高RLP-C/PCSK9组的mace发生率高于低RLP-C/PCSK9组(20.68%比8.76%)。Cox比例风险回归模型分析显示,与传统危险因素无关的高PCSK9水平受试者,RLP-C与mace风险增加相关(风险比:1.791;95%置信区间:1.168-2.825;P = 0.001),但在低PCSK9水平的患者中没有。结论:RLP-C被确定为mace的危险因素,特别是在PCSK9水平高的受试者中。降低PCSK9水平可能降低血浆RLP-C水平升高的受试者的剩余风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信