Academic patents and entrepreneurial intention. To what extent are other knowledge transfer mechanisms affected in a Mexican university?

Q3 Social Sciences
M. G. Calderón, P. Pérez
{"title":"Academic patents and entrepreneurial intention. To what extent are other knowledge transfer mechanisms affected in a Mexican university?","authors":"M. G. Calderón, P. Pérez","doi":"10.1344/JESB2021.2.J094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to expand the explanations about the debate on academic entrepreneurship and other knowledge transfer mechanisms, to respond to what extent entrepreneurial intention affects the diffusion and dissemination of knowledge in a Mexican university. The lack of indicators of commercial activity, leads us to propose the analysis of a pre-commercial stage of technology that we call entrepreneurial intention. After the literature review, we present a database of academic inventors in patents granted to the university, identifying patenting with an entrepreneurial intention, following Lomas (1993) knowledge transfer taxonomy. Data about publications and received citations by academic inventors is also considered for knowledge diffusion; as well as the supervision of end-of-degree projects in undergraduate and graduate studies; before and after the patent was granted, for knowledge dissemination. Using a binomial model, we estimated two data sets, one for the period 1984-2000 and the second for 2001-2020. Our findings reveal, an average increase of 60% in the number of patents obtained. We also found that the characteristics of the research group are significant in both models, but in the 2001-2020 period it is more important to integrate foreign inventors than patenting with firms, the dissemination of knowledge is more significant and has greater importance in the model. To respond to what extent entrepreneurial intention affects the diffusion and dissemination of knowledge, greater attention should be paid to the diffusion of knowledge since in both models the variable that represents publications after patenting is not significant. The explanation about the dissemination of knowledge improves substantially from one period to another.","PeriodicalId":36112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/JESB2021.2.J094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to expand the explanations about the debate on academic entrepreneurship and other knowledge transfer mechanisms, to respond to what extent entrepreneurial intention affects the diffusion and dissemination of knowledge in a Mexican university. The lack of indicators of commercial activity, leads us to propose the analysis of a pre-commercial stage of technology that we call entrepreneurial intention. After the literature review, we present a database of academic inventors in patents granted to the university, identifying patenting with an entrepreneurial intention, following Lomas (1993) knowledge transfer taxonomy. Data about publications and received citations by academic inventors is also considered for knowledge diffusion; as well as the supervision of end-of-degree projects in undergraduate and graduate studies; before and after the patent was granted, for knowledge dissemination. Using a binomial model, we estimated two data sets, one for the period 1984-2000 and the second for 2001-2020. Our findings reveal, an average increase of 60% in the number of patents obtained. We also found that the characteristics of the research group are significant in both models, but in the 2001-2020 period it is more important to integrate foreign inventors than patenting with firms, the dissemination of knowledge is more significant and has greater importance in the model. To respond to what extent entrepreneurial intention affects the diffusion and dissemination of knowledge, greater attention should be paid to the diffusion of knowledge since in both models the variable that represents publications after patenting is not significant. The explanation about the dissemination of knowledge improves substantially from one period to another.
学术专利和创业意向。墨西哥大学的其他知识转移机制在多大程度上受到影响?
本研究旨在扩展对学术创业和其他知识转移机制争论的解释,以回应创业意图在多大程度上影响墨西哥大学知识的传播和传播。商业活动指标的缺乏,导致我们提出了对技术商业化前阶段的分析,我们称之为创业意图。在文献综述之后,我们提出了一个授予该大学专利的学术发明人数据库,根据Lomas(1993)知识转移分类法,确定具有创业意图的专利。关于学术发明人的出版物和收到的引文的数据也被考虑用于知识传播;以及监督本科生和研究生的学位结束项目;专利授予前后,用于知识传播。使用二项式模型,我们估计了两个数据集,一个是1984-2000年,另一个是2001-2020年。我们的研究结果显示,获得的专利数量平均增加了60%。我们还发现,研究小组的特征在这两个模型中都很显著,但在2001-2020年期间,整合外国发明人比与公司申请专利更重要,知识的传播在模型中更重要。为了应对创业意图在多大程度上影响知识的传播和传播,应该更加关注知识的传播,因为在这两种模式中,代表专利申请后出版物的变量并不重要。从一个时期到另一个时期,关于知识传播的解释有了很大的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business
Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信