Being a Student and Faculty Member in the Faculty of Medicine During Pandemic: An Evaluation of Distance Education

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
H. İkiışık, Merve Kirlangiç, Hasan Huseyin Mutlu, I. Maral
{"title":"Being a Student and Faculty Member in the Faculty of Medicine During Pandemic: An Evaluation of Distance Education","authors":"H. İkiışık, Merve Kirlangiç, Hasan Huseyin Mutlu, I. Maral","doi":"10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.6026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We aimed to reveal the opinions of students and faculty members about the educational process in the distance education provided in a medical school during the pandemic period, the problems they encounter and their relationship with digital literacy levels. Methods: The design of the study is cross-sectional. An online survey including demographic information, positive and negative aspects of distance education, opinions about the process, and digital literacy scale was administered to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th year medical students and faculty members. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant in the data analysis. Results: A total of 513 individuals (52.9%) responded to the questionnaires. The mean digital literacy score was 3.42 +/- 0.84 for students and 3.57 +/- 0.82 for faculty members. For faculty members, age (B=-0.041, t=-2.72 p=0.009) and having no previous distance education experience (B=-0.813, t=-2.32 p=0.025), and for students, female gender (B=-0.287, t=-3.65 p < 0.001) and having no previous distance education experience (B=-0.343, t=-2.53 p=0.011). Conclusion: Distance education, which gained speed with the pandemic, will continue to exist in education in the coming years. Although the digital literacy scores of students and faculty members in the medical faculty are above average, advanced digital literacy will enable better and accurate use of digital technologies and a more effective and efficient education.","PeriodicalId":8757,"journal":{"name":"Bezmialem Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bezmialem Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.6026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to reveal the opinions of students and faculty members about the educational process in the distance education provided in a medical school during the pandemic period, the problems they encounter and their relationship with digital literacy levels. Methods: The design of the study is cross-sectional. An online survey including demographic information, positive and negative aspects of distance education, opinions about the process, and digital literacy scale was administered to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th year medical students and faculty members. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant in the data analysis. Results: A total of 513 individuals (52.9%) responded to the questionnaires. The mean digital literacy score was 3.42 +/- 0.84 for students and 3.57 +/- 0.82 for faculty members. For faculty members, age (B=-0.041, t=-2.72 p=0.009) and having no previous distance education experience (B=-0.813, t=-2.32 p=0.025), and for students, female gender (B=-0.287, t=-3.65 p < 0.001) and having no previous distance education experience (B=-0.343, t=-2.53 p=0.011). Conclusion: Distance education, which gained speed with the pandemic, will continue to exist in education in the coming years. Although the digital literacy scores of students and faculty members in the medical faculty are above average, advanced digital literacy will enable better and accurate use of digital technologies and a more effective and efficient education.
在疫情期间成为医学院的学生和教员:对远程教育的评估
目的:我们旨在揭示学生和教职员工对疫情期间医学院远程教育的教育过程、他们遇到的问题以及他们与数字素养水平的关系的看法。方法:本研究采用横断面设计。对医学一年级、二年级、三年级、四年级和五年级的学生和教职员工进行了一项在线调查,包括人口统计信息、远程教育的积极和消极方面、对过程的看法以及数字素养量表。在数据分析中,p值<0.05被认为是显著的。结果:共有513人(52.9%)对问卷进行了回复。学生的平均数字素养得分为3.42+/-0.84,教师为3.57+/-0.82。对于年龄(B=-0.041,t=-2.72 p=0.009)且以前没有远程教育经验(B=-0.813,t=-2.32 p=0.025)的教职员工,以及女性(B=-0.287,t=-3.65 p=0.001)且之前没有远程教育经历(B=-0.343,t=-2.53 p=0.011)的学生,将在未来几年继续存在于教育中。尽管医学院学生和教职员工的数字素养得分高于平均水平,但先进的数字素养将使数字技术得到更好、准确的使用,并使教育更加有效和高效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bezmialem Science
Bezmialem Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信