“A True Landmark to Warn”: Seduction-Betrayal and the Recognition of History in Delarivier Manley’s The New Atalantis

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Kay Chronister
{"title":"“A True Landmark to Warn”: Seduction-Betrayal and the Recognition of History in Delarivier Manley’s The New Atalantis","authors":"Kay Chronister","doi":"10.3138/ecf.34.3.269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Organized as a diffuse collection of vignettes, Delariver Manley’s The New Atalantis (1709) has proven challenging to approach as a discrete work. In this essay, I engage Atalantis as a romance and argue that the text is structurally unified by patterns of repetition, in particular the repetition of a narrative that I term “the seduction-betrayal fantasy.” The topos of political seduction-betrayal was widespread in early eighteenth-century Tory historiography as a means of acknowledging the failures of the Stuart monarchy while displacing blame away from monarchs onto others in their orbits. Yet it was frequently difficult for historians to “prove” that political seduction-betrayal had occurred. I argue that Manley addresses this challenge in Atalantis by pairing vignettes concerning political treachery with structurally analogous vignettes about well-known sexual seduction-betrayals. These sets of dyads invite readers to interpret controversial episodes from political history through paradigms generated by strategically selected stories of sexual wrongdoing. However, they also enable Manley to inject moments of ambivalence into her Tory secret history.","PeriodicalId":43800,"journal":{"name":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","volume":"34 1","pages":"269 - 285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.34.3.269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Organized as a diffuse collection of vignettes, Delariver Manley’s The New Atalantis (1709) has proven challenging to approach as a discrete work. In this essay, I engage Atalantis as a romance and argue that the text is structurally unified by patterns of repetition, in particular the repetition of a narrative that I term “the seduction-betrayal fantasy.” The topos of political seduction-betrayal was widespread in early eighteenth-century Tory historiography as a means of acknowledging the failures of the Stuart monarchy while displacing blame away from monarchs onto others in their orbits. Yet it was frequently difficult for historians to “prove” that political seduction-betrayal had occurred. I argue that Manley addresses this challenge in Atalantis by pairing vignettes concerning political treachery with structurally analogous vignettes about well-known sexual seduction-betrayals. These sets of dyads invite readers to interpret controversial episodes from political history through paradigms generated by strategically selected stories of sexual wrongdoing. However, they also enable Manley to inject moments of ambivalence into her Tory secret history.
“一个真正值得警惕的里程碑”:德莱维耶·曼利《新亚特兰大人》中的诱惑-背叛与对历史的认识
摘要:曼利(Delariver Manley)的《新亚特兰大人》(The New atlantis, 1709)是一部散漫的小插图集,作为一部独立的作品来处理具有挑战性。在这篇文章中,我把《阿塔兰提斯》当作一部浪漫小说,并认为文本在结构上是由重复的模式统一的,尤其是我称之为“诱惑背叛幻想”的叙事的重复。政治诱惑-背叛的话题在18世纪早期的托利党史学中广泛存在,作为承认斯图亚特王朝失败的一种手段,同时将君主的责任转移到他们的轨道上的其他人身上。然而,历史学家往往很难“证明”政治诱惑背叛已经发生。我认为曼利在《亚特兰大》中解决了这一挑战,他将关于政治背叛的小插曲与结构上类似的关于众所周知的性诱惑-背叛的小插曲配对。这些二元组合邀请读者通过精心挑选的性犯罪故事所产生的范式来解读政治史上有争议的事件。然而,它们也使曼利能够在她的保守党秘密历史中注入矛盾的时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信