Sex Disparities Among Fellowship Program Directors in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Jason Silvestre, Abhishek Tippabhatla, Ambica Chopra, Charles L Nelson, Dawn M LaPorte
{"title":"Sex Disparities Among Fellowship Program Directors in Orthopaedic Surgery.","authors":"Jason Silvestre, Abhishek Tippabhatla, Ambica Chopra, Charles L Nelson, Dawn M LaPorte","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.00278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women are underrepresented in the orthopaedic surgery workforce in the U.S. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the representation of women among fellowship program directors (PDs) in orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of fellowship PDs in orthopaedic surgery during the 2022 to 2023 academic year. Academic, training, and demographic characteristics were collected from internet-based resources. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated for both men and women. A PPR of <0.8 indicated underrepresentation and a PPR of >1.2 indicated overrepresentation. Bivariate analyses were utilized to assess the correlation between sex diversity and geographic region and between sex diversity and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accreditation status. The relationship between the median annual salary and the sex diversity of each orthopaedic subspecialty was analyzed with use of the Pearson correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 600 fellowship PDs, 40 (6.7%) of whom were women. In total, 24.5% of the fellowship PDs were assistant professors (8.8% women versus 91.2% men, p < 0.001); 26.2% were associate professors (9.6% women versus 90.4% men, p < 0.001); 36.8% were full professors (4.5% women versus 95.5% men, p < 0.001); and 12.5% were unranked (2.7% women versus 97.3% men, p < 0.001). The representation of women increased with academic rank, as reflected in their prevalence at the assistant (PPR = 0.67), associate (PPR = 0.77), and full professor (PPR = 0.80) levels. Among the orthopaedic subspecialties, musculoskeletal oncology (19.0%), pediatric orthopaedics (14.6%), and hand surgery (12.6%) had the highest proportions of women fellowship PDs. PPRs were lowest for orthopaedic sports medicine (PPR = 0.35), shoulder and elbow (PPR = 0.45), and adult reconstruction (PPR = 0.52). Women PDs had equitable representation in musculoskeletal oncology (PPR = 1.17), hand surgery (PPR = 1.02), foot and ankle (PPR = 0.84), and orthopaedic trauma (PPR = 0.80). Median subspecialty compensation was negatively correlated with the prevalence of women among fellowship PDs (r = -0.70, p = 0.036). Geographic region was not associated with sex diversity (p = 0.434), but programs with ACGME accreditation had significantly more women fellowship PDs than those without (11.0% versus 3.9%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women are underrepresented among orthopaedic fellowship PDs, especially in certain subspecialties (orthopaedic sports medicine, shoulder and elbow, and adult reconstruction). More research is needed to understand the barriers that impact the representation of women among leadership positions in orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Greater sex diversity among fellowship PDs may help to increase the recruitment of women into orthopaedic subspecialties. The equitable consideration of orthopaedic surgeons from all backgrounds for leadership positions can increase workforce diversity, which may improve the vitality of the orthopaedic community.</p>","PeriodicalId":15048,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","volume":" ","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.00278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women are underrepresented in the orthopaedic surgery workforce in the U.S. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the representation of women among fellowship program directors (PDs) in orthopaedic surgery.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of fellowship PDs in orthopaedic surgery during the 2022 to 2023 academic year. Academic, training, and demographic characteristics were collected from internet-based resources. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated for both men and women. A PPR of <0.8 indicated underrepresentation and a PPR of >1.2 indicated overrepresentation. Bivariate analyses were utilized to assess the correlation between sex diversity and geographic region and between sex diversity and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accreditation status. The relationship between the median annual salary and the sex diversity of each orthopaedic subspecialty was analyzed with use of the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: This study included 600 fellowship PDs, 40 (6.7%) of whom were women. In total, 24.5% of the fellowship PDs were assistant professors (8.8% women versus 91.2% men, p < 0.001); 26.2% were associate professors (9.6% women versus 90.4% men, p < 0.001); 36.8% were full professors (4.5% women versus 95.5% men, p < 0.001); and 12.5% were unranked (2.7% women versus 97.3% men, p < 0.001). The representation of women increased with academic rank, as reflected in their prevalence at the assistant (PPR = 0.67), associate (PPR = 0.77), and full professor (PPR = 0.80) levels. Among the orthopaedic subspecialties, musculoskeletal oncology (19.0%), pediatric orthopaedics (14.6%), and hand surgery (12.6%) had the highest proportions of women fellowship PDs. PPRs were lowest for orthopaedic sports medicine (PPR = 0.35), shoulder and elbow (PPR = 0.45), and adult reconstruction (PPR = 0.52). Women PDs had equitable representation in musculoskeletal oncology (PPR = 1.17), hand surgery (PPR = 1.02), foot and ankle (PPR = 0.84), and orthopaedic trauma (PPR = 0.80). Median subspecialty compensation was negatively correlated with the prevalence of women among fellowship PDs (r = -0.70, p = 0.036). Geographic region was not associated with sex diversity (p = 0.434), but programs with ACGME accreditation had significantly more women fellowship PDs than those without (11.0% versus 3.9%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Women are underrepresented among orthopaedic fellowship PDs, especially in certain subspecialties (orthopaedic sports medicine, shoulder and elbow, and adult reconstruction). More research is needed to understand the barriers that impact the representation of women among leadership positions in orthopaedic surgery.

Clinical relevance: Greater sex diversity among fellowship PDs may help to increase the recruitment of women into orthopaedic subspecialties. The equitable consideration of orthopaedic surgeons from all backgrounds for leadership positions can increase workforce diversity, which may improve the vitality of the orthopaedic community.

整形外科奖学金项目主任的性别差异
在美国整形外科工作人员中,女性的代表性不足。本研究的目的是阐明女性在整形外科研究金项目主任(PD)中的代表性。这是2022至2023学年整形外科研究金PD的回顾性队列研究。学术、培训和人口统计特征是从基于互联网的资源中收集的。对男性和女性的参与率与患病率进行了计算。PPR为1.2,表明任职人数过多。采用双变量分析来评估性别多样性与地理区域之间的相关性,以及性别多样性和研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认证状态之间的相关性。应用Pearson相关系数分析了整形外科各专科的年薪中位数与性别多样性之间的关系。这项研究包括600名研究金PD,其中40人(6.7%)是女性。总的来说,24.5%的研究金PD是助理教授(女性8.8%,男性91.2%,p<0.001);副教授占26.2%(女性9.6%,男性90.4%,p<0.001);36.8%为正教授(4.5%为女性,95.5%为男性,p<0.001);12.5%未排名(女性2.7%,男性97.3%,p<0.001)。女性的代表性随着学术排名的增加而增加,反映在助理(PPR=0.67)、副教授(PPR=0.77)和正教授(PPR0.80)级别的患病率上。在骨科亚专业中,肌肉骨骼肿瘤学(19.0%)、儿科骨科(14.6%)和手外科(12.6%)的女性研究金PD比例最高。骨科运动医学(PPR=0.35)、肩部和肘部(PPR=0.45)以及成人重建(PPR=0.52)的PPR最低。女性PD在肌肉骨骼肿瘤学(PPR=1.17)、手外科(PPR=1.02)、足部和脚踝(PPR=0.84)、,和骨科创伤(PPR=0.80)。亚专业补偿中位数与研究金PD中女性的患病率呈负相关(r=-0.70,p=0.036)。地理区域与性别多样性无关(p=0.434),但获得ACGME认证的项目拥有的女性研究金PD明显多于没有认证的项目(11.0%对3.9%,p<0.001)。女性在骨科研究金PD中的代表性不足,尤其是在某些亚专业(骨科运动医学、肩肘关节和成人重建)。需要更多的研究来了解影响女性在整形外科领导职位中代表性的障碍。研究金PD中更大的性别多样性可能有助于增加女性进入骨科亚专业的招聘。公平考虑来自各种背景的整形外科医生担任领导职位可以增加劳动力的多样性,这可能会提高整形外科社区的活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信