Effectiveness of Different Sterilization Methods on Clinical Orthodontic Materials

Anil Ardeshna, K. Chavan, Anjana Prakasam, Dev Ardeshna, D. Shah, K. Velliyagounder
{"title":"Effectiveness of Different Sterilization Methods on Clinical Orthodontic Materials","authors":"Anil Ardeshna, K. Chavan, Anjana Prakasam, Dev Ardeshna, D. Shah, K. Velliyagounder","doi":"10.1177/03015742221109026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Orthodontic appliances such as wires and brackets received from manufacturers come unsterilized and may be contaminated with various microorganisms before being used in the mouth. In this study, we evaluated and identified the bacterial contamination on orthodontic appliances along with the disinfecting efficacy of ultraviolet (UV) light and various sterilization methods. Methods Different orthodontic appliances were obtained from manufacturers divided into 5 sterilization methods and a control group (control, UV, dry heat and steam autoclave, ethyl alcohol, and 2% glutaraldehyde). Microbiological and DNA sequencing was performed on the appliances to identify the contaminated bacteria. Results Bacterial contamination identified on the orthodontic appliances were Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Lactobacilli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus cereus. UV sterilization method effectively prevented the bacterial growth when compared to the control (unsterilized) orthodontic appliances. Conclusion We concluded that the orthodontic appliances received from the manufacturer showed bacterial contamination. All of the tested sterilization methods including UV light were effective in eliminating the bacterial contamination on the orthodontic appliances. Since UV light does not cause change in material properties and is cost effective with relative ease of use, its use in clinical practice for the disinfection of orthodontic appliances is suggested before placement in the mouth.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":"57 1","pages":"98 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742221109026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Orthodontic appliances such as wires and brackets received from manufacturers come unsterilized and may be contaminated with various microorganisms before being used in the mouth. In this study, we evaluated and identified the bacterial contamination on orthodontic appliances along with the disinfecting efficacy of ultraviolet (UV) light and various sterilization methods. Methods Different orthodontic appliances were obtained from manufacturers divided into 5 sterilization methods and a control group (control, UV, dry heat and steam autoclave, ethyl alcohol, and 2% glutaraldehyde). Microbiological and DNA sequencing was performed on the appliances to identify the contaminated bacteria. Results Bacterial contamination identified on the orthodontic appliances were Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Lactobacilli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus cereus. UV sterilization method effectively prevented the bacterial growth when compared to the control (unsterilized) orthodontic appliances. Conclusion We concluded that the orthodontic appliances received from the manufacturer showed bacterial contamination. All of the tested sterilization methods including UV light were effective in eliminating the bacterial contamination on the orthodontic appliances. Since UV light does not cause change in material properties and is cost effective with relative ease of use, its use in clinical practice for the disinfection of orthodontic appliances is suggested before placement in the mouth.
临床正畸材料不同灭菌方法的效果分析
背景:从制造商那里收到的正畸器具,如金属丝和托槽,在进入口腔使用前未经消毒,可能被各种微生物污染。在本研究中,我们评估和鉴定了正畸矫治器上的细菌污染,以及紫外线(UV)光和各种灭菌方法的消毒效果。方法采用不同厂家生产的正畸矫治器,分为5种灭菌方法和对照组(对照组、紫外线灭菌组、干热蒸汽灭菌组、乙醇灭菌组、2%戊二醛灭菌组)。对器具进行微生物学和DNA测序以鉴定污染细菌。结果口腔正畸矫治器污染细菌主要为金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、乳酸菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、地衣芽孢杆菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌。与对照(未消毒)正畸矫治器相比,紫外线灭菌方法有效地阻止了细菌的生长。结论从生产厂家收到的正畸矫治器存在细菌污染。包括紫外线在内的所有灭菌方法均能有效消除正畸矫治器上的细菌污染。由于紫外线不会改变材料的性能,而且相对容易使用,成本效益高,因此建议在临床实践中使用紫外线,在将正畸器具放入口腔之前对其进行消毒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信