A Regarded Self: Caribbean Womanhood and the Ethics of Disorderly Being by Kaiama L. Glover (review)

IF 0.4 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Jake J. McGuirk
{"title":"A Regarded Self: Caribbean Womanhood and the Ethics of Disorderly Being by Kaiama L. Glover (review)","authors":"Jake J. McGuirk","doi":"10.1353/ari.2023.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"163 Pascale Casanova, and Franco Moretti, among others. Yet, despite Ramazani’s impressive transcendence of the national as an analytical category, the question of the dominance of the category of “the nation” in reading poetry remains. This is understandable because Ramazani’s focus is on a transnational understanding of poetics; however, certain questions remain: if we take the nation as a social construct, how is the national constructed in the postcolonial world? How can we reimagine polytemporality and polyspatiality from the complex discursive construct of the nation, when it is as complex (in many instances) as the very concept of the “transnational”? In his second chapter, for example, Ramazani thinks of place in poetry as both “local” and “extra-local,” but he ascribes the extra-locality wholly to the transnational; yet, there is also the possibility of the local interacting with the national as a category, which Ramazani bypasses in his focus on the transnational, thus screening out the many ways the local is posed against the national. If forms are transnational, do they originate from the nation as a community or the nation as a state? These are not questions that Ramazani must or ought to have answered, but further studies certainly warrant a rethinking of globality in a world of solidified nationalisms.","PeriodicalId":51893,"journal":{"name":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","volume":" ","pages":"163 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2023.0008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

163 Pascale Casanova, and Franco Moretti, among others. Yet, despite Ramazani’s impressive transcendence of the national as an analytical category, the question of the dominance of the category of “the nation” in reading poetry remains. This is understandable because Ramazani’s focus is on a transnational understanding of poetics; however, certain questions remain: if we take the nation as a social construct, how is the national constructed in the postcolonial world? How can we reimagine polytemporality and polyspatiality from the complex discursive construct of the nation, when it is as complex (in many instances) as the very concept of the “transnational”? In his second chapter, for example, Ramazani thinks of place in poetry as both “local” and “extra-local,” but he ascribes the extra-locality wholly to the transnational; yet, there is also the possibility of the local interacting with the national as a category, which Ramazani bypasses in his focus on the transnational, thus screening out the many ways the local is posed against the national. If forms are transnational, do they originate from the nation as a community or the nation as a state? These are not questions that Ramazani must or ought to have answered, but further studies certainly warrant a rethinking of globality in a world of solidified nationalisms.
《被关注的自我:加勒比女性与无序存在的伦理》作者:Kaiama L. Glover(书评)
163 Pascale Casanova和Franco Moretti等。然而,尽管拉马扎尼对民族作为一个分析范畴的超越令人印象深刻,但“民族”这一范畴在诗歌阅读中的主导地位问题仍然存在。这是可以理解的,因为拉马扎尼的重点是对诗学的跨国理解;然而,仍然存在一些问题:如果我们把国家作为一种社会建构,那么在后殖民世界中,国家是如何建构的?当国家的复杂性(在许多情况下)与“跨国”的概念一样复杂时,我们如何从国家的复杂话语结构中重新想象多时代性和多空间性?例如,在他的第二章中,拉马扎尼认为诗歌中的位置既是“本地的”又是“超本地的”,但他将超本地完全归因于跨国;然而,地方也有可能作为一个类别与国家互动,拉马扎尼在关注跨国时忽略了这一点,从而屏蔽了地方与国家的许多对抗方式。如果形式是跨国的,它们是源于作为一个社区的国家还是源于作为国家的国家?这些都不是拉马扎尼必须或应该回答的问题,但进一步的研究无疑需要在一个国家主义固化的世界里重新思考全球性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信