A pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of automated mechanical respiratory aid device

Gautham Pasupuleti, M. Mukund, Sharon A. George, Srimathi Bai KM
{"title":"A pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of automated mechanical respiratory aid device","authors":"Gautham Pasupuleti, M. Mukund, Sharon A. George, Srimathi Bai KM","doi":"10.53097/jmv.10064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: High burden of morbidity and mortality due to respiratory illnesses was witnessed during the COVID-19 pandemic. We developed a portable automated mechanical respiratory assist device (RespirAID R20) that delivers Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation by mechanically compressing a Bag Valve Mask. The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the RespirAID R20, a mechanical ventilation device in post-operative care patients. Method: This pilot study enrolled five subjects at Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, India. Post-operative subjects were transferred from the Mindray Synovent E3 (standard ventilator) to the RespirAID R20 for 3 hours. Ventilator and physiologic parameters were recorded and compared. Result: All patients maintained normal blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rhythm. The delivered mean tidal volume (VT) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was 419.64 +/- 11 ml and 20 +/- 2 cmH2O, which remained within the initial set range of 428 +/- 12 ml and 24 +/- 2 cmH2O throughout the study duration. Arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters during RespirAID R20, except PaO2, were within the normal range. PaO2 levels were greater than 300 mm Hg during the first four hours (323 +/- 163 mmHg and 344 +/- 97 mmHg). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggests that RespirAID R20 may be an alternative device in providing respiratory assistance to sedated and intubated adult patients in the postoperative period. Additional studies are required to evaluate other possible applications of the RespirAID R20. Keywords: RespirAID R20, ABG parameters, mechanical ventilation, respiratory assist","PeriodicalId":73813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53097/jmv.10064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High burden of morbidity and mortality due to respiratory illnesses was witnessed during the COVID-19 pandemic. We developed a portable automated mechanical respiratory assist device (RespirAID R20) that delivers Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation by mechanically compressing a Bag Valve Mask. The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the RespirAID R20, a mechanical ventilation device in post-operative care patients. Method: This pilot study enrolled five subjects at Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, India. Post-operative subjects were transferred from the Mindray Synovent E3 (standard ventilator) to the RespirAID R20 for 3 hours. Ventilator and physiologic parameters were recorded and compared. Result: All patients maintained normal blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rhythm. The delivered mean tidal volume (VT) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was 419.64 +/- 11 ml and 20 +/- 2 cmH2O, which remained within the initial set range of 428 +/- 12 ml and 24 +/- 2 cmH2O throughout the study duration. Arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters during RespirAID R20, except PaO2, were within the normal range. PaO2 levels were greater than 300 mm Hg during the first four hours (323 +/- 163 mmHg and 344 +/- 97 mmHg). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggests that RespirAID R20 may be an alternative device in providing respiratory assistance to sedated and intubated adult patients in the postoperative period. Additional studies are required to evaluate other possible applications of the RespirAID R20. Keywords: RespirAID R20, ABG parameters, mechanical ventilation, respiratory assist
评估自动机械呼吸辅助装置安全性和有效性的初步研究
背景:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,呼吸系统疾病造成的发病率和死亡率负担很高。我们开发了一种便携式自动机械呼吸辅助设备(RespirAID R20),通过机械压缩袋阀面罩来提供间歇性正压通气。本研究的目的是评估RespirAID R20(一种用于术后护理患者的机械通气装置)的安全性和有效性。方法:这项试点研究在印度叶内波亚医学院医院招募了五名受试者。术后受试者从迈瑞Synovent E3(标准呼吸机)转移到RespirAID R20,持续3小时。记录并比较呼吸机和生理参数。结果:所有患者的血压、心率和心律均保持正常。输送的平均潮气量(VT)和峰值吸气压力(PIP)分别为419.64+/-11 ml和20+/-2 cmH2O,在整个研究期间保持在428+/-12 ml和24+/-2 cmH2O的初始设定范围内。除PaO2外,RespirAID R20期间的动脉血气(ABG)参数均在正常范围内。前四小时内,PaO2水平大于300毫米汞柱(323+/-163毫米汞柱和344+/-97毫米汞柱)。结论:本研究结果表明,RespirAID R20可能是一种在术后为镇静和插管的成年患者提供呼吸辅助的替代设备。需要进行额外的研究来评估RespirAID R20的其他可能应用。关键词:RespirAID R20,ABG参数,机械通气,呼吸辅助
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信