Reliability of the handheld dynamometer in the evaluation of the muscle strength of trunk extensors in healthy adults

Q4 Medicine
Mariana do Carmo Pinto Oliveira Barros, Nathália Passos Clemente, Fábio de Lima Rezende, Thais B Cardoso, S. Thomaz, P. Garcia, A. L. Ribeiro, W. Martins
{"title":"Reliability of the handheld dynamometer in the evaluation of the muscle strength of trunk extensors in healthy adults","authors":"Mariana do Carmo Pinto Oliveira Barros, Nathália Passos Clemente, Fábio de Lima Rezende, Thais B Cardoso, S. Thomaz, P. Garcia, A. L. Ribeiro, W. Martins","doi":"10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.20784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The muscular performance of the lumbar spine is frequently assessed in studies that compare populations with and without low back pain. However, the gold standard equipment used to evaluate the strength of these muscles has a high cost. Therefore, rarely used in the clinical practice of health professionals, being the handheld dynamometer is an accessible alternative for use in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the reliability of the handheld dynamometer in the measurement of maximum voluntary isometric contraction of trunk extensors in healthy adults. Twenty-six healthy adults of both sexes (21.53± 1.88 years old) performed the test and retest with a 1-week interval. The comparison between test-retest demonstrated high and very high intraclass correlation coefficient for peak strength (0.82; 0.60 to 0.92) and mean strength (0.90; 0.76 to 0.95), respectively. Also, the Bland-Altman analyses indicate an error of 5.10 kg for peak strength and 5.7 kg for mean strength. In addition, the minimum detectable change for peak strength was 6.03kg (16.18%) and 5.92 kg for mean strength (20.95%). In conclusion, the test presents high reliability for the extensor muscles of the trunk in healthy adults. Therefore, the use of the handheld dynamometer can be indicated for clinical practice.\nKeywords: manual dynamometer; assessment; force; back strength; evidence-based practice.","PeriodicalId":53589,"journal":{"name":"Motricidade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motricidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.20784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The muscular performance of the lumbar spine is frequently assessed in studies that compare populations with and without low back pain. However, the gold standard equipment used to evaluate the strength of these muscles has a high cost. Therefore, rarely used in the clinical practice of health professionals, being the handheld dynamometer is an accessible alternative for use in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the reliability of the handheld dynamometer in the measurement of maximum voluntary isometric contraction of trunk extensors in healthy adults. Twenty-six healthy adults of both sexes (21.53± 1.88 years old) performed the test and retest with a 1-week interval. The comparison between test-retest demonstrated high and very high intraclass correlation coefficient for peak strength (0.82; 0.60 to 0.92) and mean strength (0.90; 0.76 to 0.95), respectively. Also, the Bland-Altman analyses indicate an error of 5.10 kg for peak strength and 5.7 kg for mean strength. In addition, the minimum detectable change for peak strength was 6.03kg (16.18%) and 5.92 kg for mean strength (20.95%). In conclusion, the test presents high reliability for the extensor muscles of the trunk in healthy adults. Therefore, the use of the handheld dynamometer can be indicated for clinical practice. Keywords: manual dynamometer; assessment; force; back strength; evidence-based practice.
手持式测功机在评估健康成年人躯干伸肌肌力中的可靠性
在比较有和没有腰痛的人群的研究中,经常评估腰椎的肌肉性能。然而,用于评估这些肌肉力量的金标准设备成本很高。因此,很少在卫生专业人员的临床实践中使用,手持式测功机是临床实践中可使用的替代品。因此,本研究旨在确定手持式测功机在测量健康成年人躯干伸肌最大自主等长收缩方面的可靠性。26名男女健康成年人(21.53±1.88岁)进行了测试和重新测试,间隔1周。重测之间的比较表明,峰值强度(0.82;0.60至0.92)和平均强度(0.90;0.76至0.95)的组内相关系数分别很高和非常高。此外,Bland-Altman分析表明,峰值强度误差为5.10 kg,平均强度误差为5.7 kg。此外,峰值强度的最小可检测变化为6.03kg(16.18%),平均强度的最小检测变化为5.92kg(20.95%)。总之,该测试对健康成年人的躯干伸肌具有很高的可靠性。因此,手持式测功机的使用可以用于临床实践。关键词:手动测功机;看法武力背部力量;循证实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Motricidade
Motricidade Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信