Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Pulse Rate and Time-to-Default from Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure Patients

IF 0.5 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yikeber Abebaw, K. Yusuf, Ademe Aragaw, Bezanesh Melese
{"title":"Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Pulse Rate and Time-to-Default from Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure Patients","authors":"Yikeber Abebaw, K. Yusuf, Ademe Aragaw, Bezanesh Melese","doi":"10.2147/rrcc.s326229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Globally, heart failure is a rapidly growing public health problem with an estimated prevalence of >37.7 million. It is a shared chronic phase of cardiac functional loss secondary to many etiologies. Objective: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of longitudinal change in pulse rate on time to default from treatment among congestive heart failure patients. Methods: Hospital-based retrospective studies were conducted among 302 congestive heart failure patients who were 15 years old or older and who were on treatment follow-up from the 1 February 2016 to 31 December 2018 in Felege-Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Data were entered using SPSS version 23 and analyzed using SAS and R software. First, data were analyzed using linear mixed model and survival models separately, and then the joint models of both sub-models were analyzed using joint model analysis. Results: Out of the total of 302 respondents, 34.1% of the respondents defaulted from treatment. About 55.2% male respondents are defaulting and the remaining were censored. The results for separate and joint models were quite similar to each other but not identical. However, the estimated association parameter (α) in the joint model is (HR = 1.0311, 95% CI: 1.0033, 1.0597, P = 0.0278), providing there is evidence of a positive significant relationship between the survival and the longitudinal sub-models. Thus, defaulting is more likely to occur in patients with higher pulse rates. A patient, who are male, New York Heart Association class IV, had low left ventricular ejection fraction and comorbid with hypertensive, chronic kidney disease, pneumonia were risk factors of pulse rate change and defaulting from treatment of congestive heart failure patients. Conclusion: The joint model was preferred for simultaneous analyses of repeated measurement and survival data. Thus, the longitudinal measure pulse rate had a positive significant effect on time to default from treatment of patients.","PeriodicalId":42306,"journal":{"name":"Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/rrcc.s326229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Globally, heart failure is a rapidly growing public health problem with an estimated prevalence of >37.7 million. It is a shared chronic phase of cardiac functional loss secondary to many etiologies. Objective: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of longitudinal change in pulse rate on time to default from treatment among congestive heart failure patients. Methods: Hospital-based retrospective studies were conducted among 302 congestive heart failure patients who were 15 years old or older and who were on treatment follow-up from the 1 February 2016 to 31 December 2018 in Felege-Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Data were entered using SPSS version 23 and analyzed using SAS and R software. First, data were analyzed using linear mixed model and survival models separately, and then the joint models of both sub-models were analyzed using joint model analysis. Results: Out of the total of 302 respondents, 34.1% of the respondents defaulted from treatment. About 55.2% male respondents are defaulting and the remaining were censored. The results for separate and joint models were quite similar to each other but not identical. However, the estimated association parameter (α) in the joint model is (HR = 1.0311, 95% CI: 1.0033, 1.0597, P = 0.0278), providing there is evidence of a positive significant relationship between the survival and the longitudinal sub-models. Thus, defaulting is more likely to occur in patients with higher pulse rates. A patient, who are male, New York Heart Association class IV, had low left ventricular ejection fraction and comorbid with hypertensive, chronic kidney disease, pneumonia were risk factors of pulse rate change and defaulting from treatment of congestive heart failure patients. Conclusion: The joint model was preferred for simultaneous analyses of repeated measurement and survival data. Thus, the longitudinal measure pulse rate had a positive significant effect on time to default from treatment of patients.
充血性心力衰竭患者治疗的纵向脉搏率和默认时间的联合建模
背景:在全球范围内,心力衰竭是一个迅速增长的公共卫生问题,估计患病率超过3770万。它是心脏功能丧失的一个共同的慢性阶段,继发于多种病因。目的:本研究的主要目的是调查充血性心力衰竭患者因治疗而出现脉率随时间纵向变化的风险。方法:对2016年2月1日至2018年12月31日在埃塞俄比亚巴希尔达尔Felege Hiwot转诊医院接受治疗随访的302名15岁或以上充血性心力衰竭患者进行了基于医院的回顾性研究。使用SPSS 23版输入数据,并使用SAS和R软件进行分析。首先,分别使用线性混合模型和生存模型对数据进行分析,然后使用联合模型分析对两个子模型的联合模型进行分析。结果:在302名受访者中,34.1%的受访者拖欠了治疗费用。约55.2%的男性受访者违约,其余受访者则受到审查。单独模型和联合模型的结果彼此非常相似,但并不完全相同。然而,关节模型中估计的关联参数(α)为(HR=1.031,95%CI:1.00331.0597,P=0.0278),前提是有证据表明存活率与纵向子模型之间存在显著正相关。因此,在脉搏率较高的患者中更容易发生违约。一名男性患者,纽约心脏协会IV级,左心室射血分数低,合并高血压、慢性肾脏疾病、肺炎是脉率变化和充血性心力衰竭患者治疗失败的危险因素。结论:联合模型是同时分析重复测量和生存数据的首选模型。因此,纵向测量脉搏率对患者治疗失败的时间有积极显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology
Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信