Convergence analysis of science, technology, and environment expenditure: evidence from Indian states

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Vaseem Akram
{"title":"Convergence analysis of science, technology, and environment expenditure: evidence from Indian states","authors":"Vaseem Akram","doi":"10.1108/sef-10-2021-0442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere is vast disparity in public expenditure on science, technology and environment (STE) across various Indian states. Public expenditure on STE is crucial in maintaining symmetric growth, social cohesion and sustainable development. Literature on this topic is scarce, which prompted the investigation of club convergence of STE public expenditure. In particular, the purpose of this paper to study the club convergence of STE public expenditure in the case of 20 Indian states during the period from 1987–1988 to 2019–2020.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study applies the clustering algorithm to identify club convergence, advanced by the Phillips and Sul test, which enables identification of multiple steady states or club convergence, unlike beta and sigma convergences.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings of this paper show that all Indian states do not converge towards single steady states. This suggests a disparity in STE public expenditure across Indian states. Moreover, the findings favour three clubs that have their own unique transition paths. The results of this study are supported by the robustness check.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings suggest that the allocation of public expenditure on STE can be made based on club convergence to achieve social cohesion, sustainable development and millennium development goals across states.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAlthough several previous studies have investigated the convergence of public expenditure by considering either aggregate public expenditure or health/education expenditure, literature on the convergence hypothesis of STE public expenditure, particularly across Indian states, is scarce. Moreover, this paper is unique, as it examines multiple steady states or club convergence. Finally, this paper contributes to policymaking by suggesting which states should be given a push to achieve social cohesion and sustainable development.\n","PeriodicalId":45607,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-10-2021-0442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose There is vast disparity in public expenditure on science, technology and environment (STE) across various Indian states. Public expenditure on STE is crucial in maintaining symmetric growth, social cohesion and sustainable development. Literature on this topic is scarce, which prompted the investigation of club convergence of STE public expenditure. In particular, the purpose of this paper to study the club convergence of STE public expenditure in the case of 20 Indian states during the period from 1987–1988 to 2019–2020. Design/methodology/approach This study applies the clustering algorithm to identify club convergence, advanced by the Phillips and Sul test, which enables identification of multiple steady states or club convergence, unlike beta and sigma convergences. Findings The findings of this paper show that all Indian states do not converge towards single steady states. This suggests a disparity in STE public expenditure across Indian states. Moreover, the findings favour three clubs that have their own unique transition paths. The results of this study are supported by the robustness check. Practical implications The findings suggest that the allocation of public expenditure on STE can be made based on club convergence to achieve social cohesion, sustainable development and millennium development goals across states. Originality/value Although several previous studies have investigated the convergence of public expenditure by considering either aggregate public expenditure or health/education expenditure, literature on the convergence hypothesis of STE public expenditure, particularly across Indian states, is scarce. Moreover, this paper is unique, as it examines multiple steady states or club convergence. Finally, this paper contributes to policymaking by suggesting which states should be given a push to achieve social cohesion and sustainable development.
科学、技术和环境支出的趋同分析:来自印度各州的证据
目的印度各州在科学、技术和环境方面的公共支出存在巨大差异。STE的公共支出对于保持对称增长、社会凝聚力和可持续发展至关重要。关于这一主题的文献很少,这促使人们对STE公共支出的俱乐部趋同进行了研究。特别是,本文的目的是研究1987-1988年至2019-2020年期间印度20个邦STE公共支出的俱乐部收敛性。设计/方法/方法本研究应用Phillips和Sul检验提出的聚类算法来识别俱乐部收敛性,该算法能够识别多个稳态或俱乐部收敛,不同于贝塔和西格玛收敛。研究结果本文的研究结果表明,印度的所有邦并没有向单一的稳定邦趋同。这表明印度各州的STE公共支出存在差异。此外,调查结果有利于三家拥有自己独特过渡道路的俱乐部。这项研究的结果得到了稳健性检验的支持。实际意义研究结果表明,STE的公共支出分配可以基于俱乐部融合,以实现各州的社会凝聚力、可持续发展和千年发展目标。原创性/价值尽管之前的几项研究通过考虑公共支出总额或卫生/教育支出来调查公共支出的趋同,但关于STE公共支出趋同假说的文献很少,尤其是在印度各州。此外,这篇论文是独一无二的,因为它考察了多个稳态或俱乐部收敛。最后,本文建议应该推动哪些国家实现社会凝聚力和可持续发展,从而为政策制定做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Topics addressed in the journal include: ■corporate finance, ■financial markets, ■money and banking, ■international finance and economics, ■investments, ■risk management, ■theory of the firm, ■competition policy, ■corporate governance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信