Antimicrobial efficacy of postbiotics of lactic acid bacteria and their effects on food safety and shelf life of chicken meat

IF 1.8 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Beril Serter, Adem Önen, O. I. Ilhak
{"title":"Antimicrobial efficacy of postbiotics of lactic acid bacteria and their effects on food safety and shelf life of chicken meat","authors":"Beril Serter, Adem Önen, O. I. Ilhak","doi":"10.2478/aoas-2023-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study, the antibacterial effects of postbiotics obtained from Pediococcus acidilactici, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Latilactobacillus sakei, which were grown in sterile cow’s milk and De Man Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) Broth, against some food pathogens (Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Brucella melitensis) was investigated. It was observed that lactic acid bacteria postbiotics produced in MRS Broth formed larger inhibition zones than those developed in cow’s milk against pathogenic bacteria. In order to investigate the antimicrobial effect of the postbiotics on chicken breast meat and to compare this effect with lactic acid decontamination, samples contaminated with Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes were immersed into the postbiotics of L. plantarum and L. sakei, 2.1% lactic acid solution, and distilled water for 10 minutes. Microbial changes in the groups were investigated during the storage at 4 ˚C for 17 days. On the 8th day of storage, it was determined that the number of Salmonella spp. in the groups treated with postbiotics decreased by 0.9 log10 CFU/g compared to the control and distilled water groups. While the number of L. monocytogenes increased during storage in the control and distilled water groups, the postbiotics and 2.1% lactic acid exhibited a bacteriostatic effect on L. monocytogenes during storage period. Compared to the postbiotics, 2.1% lactic acid had higher reduction (1.8 log10 CFU/g) rates against Salmonella spp. (P<0.05), also a significant difference was observed against L. monocytogenes in the first and last days of storage (P<0.05). While the shelf life of chicken breast meat was determined to be 5 days in the control and distilled water groups, postbiotic treatments extended the shelf life of chicken breast meat by an extra 9 days, and %2.1 lactic acid treatment extended an extra 12 days compared to the control and distilled water treatments.","PeriodicalId":8235,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Animal Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2023-0081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this study, the antibacterial effects of postbiotics obtained from Pediococcus acidilactici, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Latilactobacillus sakei, which were grown in sterile cow’s milk and De Man Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) Broth, against some food pathogens (Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Brucella melitensis) was investigated. It was observed that lactic acid bacteria postbiotics produced in MRS Broth formed larger inhibition zones than those developed in cow’s milk against pathogenic bacteria. In order to investigate the antimicrobial effect of the postbiotics on chicken breast meat and to compare this effect with lactic acid decontamination, samples contaminated with Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes were immersed into the postbiotics of L. plantarum and L. sakei, 2.1% lactic acid solution, and distilled water for 10 minutes. Microbial changes in the groups were investigated during the storage at 4 ˚C for 17 days. On the 8th day of storage, it was determined that the number of Salmonella spp. in the groups treated with postbiotics decreased by 0.9 log10 CFU/g compared to the control and distilled water groups. While the number of L. monocytogenes increased during storage in the control and distilled water groups, the postbiotics and 2.1% lactic acid exhibited a bacteriostatic effect on L. monocytogenes during storage period. Compared to the postbiotics, 2.1% lactic acid had higher reduction (1.8 log10 CFU/g) rates against Salmonella spp. (P<0.05), also a significant difference was observed against L. monocytogenes in the first and last days of storage (P<0.05). While the shelf life of chicken breast meat was determined to be 5 days in the control and distilled water groups, postbiotic treatments extended the shelf life of chicken breast meat by an extra 9 days, and %2.1 lactic acid treatment extended an extra 12 days compared to the control and distilled water treatments.
乳酸菌益生元的抗菌效果及其对鸡肉食品安全和保质期的影响
摘要本试验研究了从无菌牛奶和德曼Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS)肉汤中培养的酸乳酸球球菌、植物乳杆菌和萨克乳杆菌后生菌对沙门氏菌、单核增生李斯特菌、大肠埃希菌O157:H7和梅氏布鲁氏菌的抑菌效果。结果表明,MRS肉汤中产生的乳酸菌对病原菌的抑制区比牛奶中产生的乳酸菌对病原菌的抑制区更大。为了研究后生制剂对鸡胸肉的抑菌效果,并与乳酸净化效果进行比较,将沙门氏菌和单核增生乳杆菌污染的样品分别浸泡在植物乳杆菌和白乳杆菌后生制剂、2.1%乳酸溶液和蒸馏水中10分钟。在4˚C条件下保存17 d,观察各组微生物的变化。在贮藏第8天,经测定,与对照组和蒸馏水组相比,益生菌处理组沙门氏菌数量减少了0.9 log10 CFU/g。对照组和蒸馏水组单核增生乳杆菌的数量在贮藏期间有所增加,而生后制剂和2.1%乳酸在贮藏期间对单核增生乳杆菌有抑菌作用。与益生后相比,2.1%乳酸对沙门氏菌的抑制率(1.8 log10 CFU/g)更高(P<0.05),对单核增生乳杆菌的抑制率在贮藏的第1天和最后1天也有显著差异(P<0.05)。在对照组和蒸馏水组中,鸡胸肉的保质期被确定为5天,与对照组和蒸馏水处理相比,益生后处理使鸡胸肉的保质期延长了9天,而%2.1乳酸处理延长了12天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Animal Science
Annals of Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Animal Science accepts original papers and reviews from the different topics of animal science: genetic and farm animal breeding, the biology, physiology and reproduction of animals, animal nutrition and feedstuffs, environment, hygiene and animal production technology, quality of animal origin products, economics and the organization of animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信