Untangling two Chinese Salix species (Salicaceae) published by C. K. Schneider, with lectotypification of four names

IF 1.8 3区生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES

Willdenowia Pub Date : 2020-04-23 DOI:10.3372/wi.50.50201

Lijuan Liu, Li He, W. Applequist

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Salix rhoophila C. K. Schneid. was originally described based on three collections. The specimens in these collections belong to two different taxa: S. rhoophila as currently recognized and a species that until now has usually been called S. alfredii Goerz ex Rehder & Kobuski. The original material of S. polyclona C. K. Schneid. and S. mictotricha C. K. Schneid. also represent the same two species. The names S. alfredii, S. mictotricha, S. polyclona and S. rhoophila are lectotypified. The orthography of S. wuana K. S. Hao ex C. F. Fang & A. K. Skvortsov is corrected (originally spelled as “Wuiana”). Salix alfredii, S. mictotricha and S. wuana are recognized as synonyms of S. polyclona.

查看原文本刊更多论文

C.K.Schneider发表的两种中国柳属植物（杨柳科）的解析及其四个名称的选择

嗜黄柳C.K.Schneid。最初是根据三个集合来描述的。这些藏品中的标本属于两个不同的分类群：目前公认的亲Rhophila和一个迄今为止通常被称为S.alfredi-Guerz ex Rehder&Kobuski的物种。S.polycona C.K.Schneid的原始材料。和S.mictotricha C.K.Schneid。也代表相同的两个物种。命名为S.alfredii、S.mictotricha、S.polycona和S.rhophila。更正了S.wuana K.S.Hao（前C.F.Fang和A.K.Skvortsov）的拼写（最初拼写为“Wuiana”）。Salix alfredii、S.mictotricha和S.wuana被认为是S.polycona的同义词。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Willdenowia PLANT SCIENCES-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

5.30%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Willdenowia is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing original research articles in English from the entire fields of plant, algal and fungal systematics, covering the evolution, taxonomy and nomenclature of these organisms as well as related fields such as floristics and plant geography. Articles on phylogeny and molecular systematics are especially welcome, as are review articles. Descriptions of new taxa may be considered, but only if supported by robust evidence. Narrowly regional studies of widespread taxa, routine typifications, checklists and new floristic records are generally not considered (excluding contributions to the Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae). Authors are encouraged to deposit duplicates of their material, especially nomenclatural types, in the Berlin herbarium (B).