To be or Not to be Transdisciplinary, That is the New Question. So, How to be Transdisciplinary?

Q3 Multidisciplinary
F. Pasquier, B. Nicolescu
{"title":"To be or Not to be Transdisciplinary, That is the New Question. So, How to be Transdisciplinary?","authors":"F. Pasquier, B. Nicolescu","doi":"10.22545/2019/0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Centuries ago Hamlet, the famous character, asked himself a similar question. We now  have to deal with the actualization of this fundamental ontological issue: “how to be” (or how not to be). Why. The difference is that in ancient times, humanity could have a long-term vision of its development (the planet earth was mostly unknown by Europeans). This is a vision we dont have anymore, as the anthropocentric period will collapse soon if humanity does not change its beliefs and way of life. Where. Since Shakespeare, the world has become a small village through globalization and the increase of all kinds of networks. So the question still remains valid anywhere on our planet, and even in outer space, where some futurologists plan a possible (and non-sensical) human extension. Propositions to discuss. We should try to answer this question by beginning here and now, as sciences and the worlds traditional wisdoms agree that all issues start from the inner self of each human being. So we have to increase knowledge by conducting research both in human sciences (philosophical and practical) and fundamental sciences (theoretical and applied). How. Certainly, each one of us tries to be a good human being... but we also must not forget that we are not alone, which means we also have to learn how to live better all together. This brings us to translate the question from just a personal position (point of view) and instead in its collective and social dimension. It means the whole thing might become a question of education: we probably have to (re)-invent a new pedagogy. It should include: transdisciplinary approach, complex thinking process, transpersonal psychology, soft skills, consciousness, spirituality (not to be confused with religion) etc. The use of (always) new technologies must be part of this investigation, as they can increase our awareness and consciousness, creating a new field called technontologies (i.e. technics + ontology). Then, we will approach a transdisciplinary paradigm for our personal and collective lives, for a future of hope and fair sharing of the only planet we collectively need to take care of. Therefore we need work together to find the answer to this question: “how to be transdisciplinary”?","PeriodicalId":33887,"journal":{"name":"Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22545/2019/0110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Centuries ago Hamlet, the famous character, asked himself a similar question. We now  have to deal with the actualization of this fundamental ontological issue: “how to be” (or how not to be). Why. The difference is that in ancient times, humanity could have a long-term vision of its development (the planet earth was mostly unknown by Europeans). This is a vision we dont have anymore, as the anthropocentric period will collapse soon if humanity does not change its beliefs and way of life. Where. Since Shakespeare, the world has become a small village through globalization and the increase of all kinds of networks. So the question still remains valid anywhere on our planet, and even in outer space, where some futurologists plan a possible (and non-sensical) human extension. Propositions to discuss. We should try to answer this question by beginning here and now, as sciences and the worlds traditional wisdoms agree that all issues start from the inner self of each human being. So we have to increase knowledge by conducting research both in human sciences (philosophical and practical) and fundamental sciences (theoretical and applied). How. Certainly, each one of us tries to be a good human being... but we also must not forget that we are not alone, which means we also have to learn how to live better all together. This brings us to translate the question from just a personal position (point of view) and instead in its collective and social dimension. It means the whole thing might become a question of education: we probably have to (re)-invent a new pedagogy. It should include: transdisciplinary approach, complex thinking process, transpersonal psychology, soft skills, consciousness, spirituality (not to be confused with religion) etc. The use of (always) new technologies must be part of this investigation, as they can increase our awareness and consciousness, creating a new field called technontologies (i.e. technics + ontology). Then, we will approach a transdisciplinary paradigm for our personal and collective lives, for a future of hope and fair sharing of the only planet we collectively need to take care of. Therefore we need work together to find the answer to this question: “how to be transdisciplinary”?
要不要成为跨学科的,这是一个新的问题。那么,如何做到跨学科?
几个世纪以前,著名人物哈姆雷特也问过自己一个类似的问题。我们现在必须处理这个基本本体论问题的实现:“如何存在”(或如何不存在)。为什么。不同之处在于,在古代,人类可以对自己的发展有一个长期的愿景(欧洲人对地球几乎一无所知)。这是我们不再拥有的愿景,因为如果人类不改变其信仰和生活方式,人类中心时代将很快崩溃。在哪里。自莎士比亚以来,由于全球化和各种网络的增加,世界已经变成了一个小村庄。因此,这个问题在我们星球上的任何地方都是有效的,甚至在一些未来学家计划可能(和荒谬的)人类扩展的外太空。要讨论的命题。我们应该从现在开始回答这个问题,因为科学和世界传统智慧都认为,所有问题都始于每个人的内在自我。因此,我们必须同时进行人文科学(哲学和实践)和基础科学(理论和应用)的研究,以增加知识。如何去做。当然,我们每个人都想做个好人……但我们也不能忘记,我们并不孤单,这意味着我们也必须学会如何更好地生活在一起。这使我们把问题从个人立场(观点)转化为集体和社会维度。这意味着整个事情可能变成一个教育问题:我们可能不得不(重新)发明一种新的教学法。它应该包括:跨学科方法、复杂思维过程、超个人心理学、软技能、意识、灵性(不要与宗教混淆)等。使用(总是)新技术必须是这个调查的一部分,因为它们可以提高我们的意识和意识,创造一个叫做技术的新领域(即技术+本体)。然后,我们将为我们的个人和集体生活建立一个跨学科的范例,为了一个充满希望的未来,为了公平地分享我们共同需要照顾的唯一星球。因此,我们需要共同努力,找到这个问题的答案:“如何成为跨学科”?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering  Science
Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信