Networks and Dramatic Form in Arden of Faversham

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Renaissance Drama Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1086/725177
Jeffrey S. Doty
{"title":"Networks and Dramatic Form in Arden of Faversham","authors":"Jeffrey S. Doty","doi":"10.1086/725177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ikely first staged in 1589 or 1590, and first printed in 1592, Arden of Faversham comes in the wake of the theaters’ shift away from the abstract or symbolic characterization typical of morality plays and Tudor interludes. Characters like Virtue and Envy have no backstories: universal rather than particular, they exist outside of history, in an eternal unchanging time that medieval and early modern audiences regarded not as a lesser but rather as a greater state of reality. Such characterization, which “involves a fundamental rhetorical separation between the play world and the real world,” was nearly ubiquitous in professional drama until the mid-1580s. David Bevington writes that “almost all pre-Marlovian plays in the sixteenth century which bear convincing evidence of popular commercial production are in fact moralities or hybrids.” According to the data compiled in British Drama: A Catalogue, roughly half of the plays for which we have extant scripts or reliable evidence from 1567 to 1584 feature allegorical characters. But from 1584 to 1590—or from John Lyly’s Galatea to Arden of Faversham—only two of thirty-five plays incorporate personified characters into the main action.","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"51 1","pages":"1 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ikely first staged in 1589 or 1590, and first printed in 1592, Arden of Faversham comes in the wake of the theaters’ shift away from the abstract or symbolic characterization typical of morality plays and Tudor interludes. Characters like Virtue and Envy have no backstories: universal rather than particular, they exist outside of history, in an eternal unchanging time that medieval and early modern audiences regarded not as a lesser but rather as a greater state of reality. Such characterization, which “involves a fundamental rhetorical separation between the play world and the real world,” was nearly ubiquitous in professional drama until the mid-1580s. David Bevington writes that “almost all pre-Marlovian plays in the sixteenth century which bear convincing evidence of popular commercial production are in fact moralities or hybrids.” According to the data compiled in British Drama: A Catalogue, roughly half of the plays for which we have extant scripts or reliable evidence from 1567 to 1584 feature allegorical characters. But from 1584 to 1590—or from John Lyly’s Galatea to Arden of Faversham—only two of thirty-five plays incorporate personified characters into the main action.
法弗舍姆《阿登》中的网络与戏剧形式
《法弗舍姆的阿登》(Arden of Faversham)于1589年或1590年首次上演,1592年首次印刷,是在剧院摆脱道德剧和都铎王朝插曲中典型的抽象或象征性人物塑造之后出现的。像《美德》和《嫉妒》这样的角色没有背景故事:它们存在于历史之外,存在于一个永恒不变的时代,中世纪和早期现代观众并不认为这是一种次要的现实状态,而是一种更大的现实状态。直到1580年代中期,这种“涉及戏剧世界和现实世界之间根本的修辞分离”的人物塑造在职业戏剧中几乎无处不在。大卫·贝文顿(David Bevington)写道,“在16世纪,几乎所有有令人信服的流行商业制作证据的前马洛维戏剧实际上都是道德或混合的。”根据《英国戏剧:目录》(British Drama:A Catalogue)中汇编的数据,从1567年到1584年,我们有现存剧本或可靠证据的戏剧中,大约有一半是寓言人物。但从1584年到1590年,或者从约翰·莱利的《加拉提亚》到法弗舍姆的《阿登》,35部戏剧中只有两部在主要动作中加入了拟人化的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renaissance Drama
Renaissance Drama Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信