Upholding the Right to Healthy Environment through Judicial Interpretation of the Right to Life

A. Abdulkadir
{"title":"Upholding the Right to Healthy Environment through Judicial Interpretation of the Right to Life","authors":"A. Abdulkadir","doi":"10.25041/plr.v4i1.3010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The late twentieth century has experienced an unprecedented increase in legal claims for human rights and the environment. The correlation between the two subjects became apparent following the Stockholm Conference of 1972. The Stockholm Conference laid the foundation for the interconnectedness between protecting the environment and realizing the protected human rights in national and international human rights instruments. This is because it has since become obvious that environmental pollution can infringe on protected rights such as the right to life, the right to peaceful enjoyment of property, and the right to privacy, to mention but a view. Therefore, any attempt to ensure the protection of the environment will invariable and enhances the realization of basic human rights.Consequently, human rights have become a legal weapon in a claim to environmental protection through judicial interpretation and expansion of the existing human rights provisions in national and international human rights instruments. Although various fundamental rights have been interpreted to encompass the protection of the environment, this paper is limited in its scope to the concept of the right to life. Examining the two most important questions has been the purpose of discussion throughout this paper. First is the degree of willingness of the Court to adopt an extensive interpretation of the right to life to protect the environment. The other is whether the courts expand traditional human rights principles. In answering these questions, this paper looks into the courts' approach through case law for proper evaluation of the right to life in protecting the environment. Likewise, the paper adopts a doctrinal legal research method. The doctrinal legal method is issues-based and involves analysis of laws and conceptual clarifications of fundamental issues depending on the objective and purpose of a research work. Therefore, within the objective of this paper, the doctrinal research method is employed in analyzing the right to a healthy environment and the judicial approach to using the right to life in preventing environmental pollution and enhancing a healthy environment.","PeriodicalId":52575,"journal":{"name":"Pancasila and Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancasila and Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v4i1.3010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The late twentieth century has experienced an unprecedented increase in legal claims for human rights and the environment. The correlation between the two subjects became apparent following the Stockholm Conference of 1972. The Stockholm Conference laid the foundation for the interconnectedness between protecting the environment and realizing the protected human rights in national and international human rights instruments. This is because it has since become obvious that environmental pollution can infringe on protected rights such as the right to life, the right to peaceful enjoyment of property, and the right to privacy, to mention but a view. Therefore, any attempt to ensure the protection of the environment will invariable and enhances the realization of basic human rights.Consequently, human rights have become a legal weapon in a claim to environmental protection through judicial interpretation and expansion of the existing human rights provisions in national and international human rights instruments. Although various fundamental rights have been interpreted to encompass the protection of the environment, this paper is limited in its scope to the concept of the right to life. Examining the two most important questions has been the purpose of discussion throughout this paper. First is the degree of willingness of the Court to adopt an extensive interpretation of the right to life to protect the environment. The other is whether the courts expand traditional human rights principles. In answering these questions, this paper looks into the courts' approach through case law for proper evaluation of the right to life in protecting the environment. Likewise, the paper adopts a doctrinal legal research method. The doctrinal legal method is issues-based and involves analysis of laws and conceptual clarifications of fundamental issues depending on the objective and purpose of a research work. Therefore, within the objective of this paper, the doctrinal research method is employed in analyzing the right to a healthy environment and the judicial approach to using the right to life in preventing environmental pollution and enhancing a healthy environment.
通过生命权司法解释维护健康环境权
二十世纪末,对人权和环境的法律要求空前增加。1972年斯德哥尔摩会议之后,这两个主题之间的相关性变得显而易见。斯德哥尔摩会议为保护环境与实现国家和国际人权文书中受保护的人权之间的相互联系奠定了基础。这是因为很明显,环境污染会侵犯受保护的权利,如生命权、和平享有财产的权利和隐私权,仅举一例。因此,任何确保环境保护的努力都将是不变的,并促进基本人权的实现。因此,通过司法解释和扩大国家和国际人权文书中现有的人权条款,人权已成为要求保护环境的法律武器。尽管各种基本权利被解释为包括保护环境,但本文的范围仅限于生命权的概念。研究这两个最重要的问题一直是本文讨论的目的。首先是法院愿意对保护环境的生命权作出广泛解释的程度。另一个问题是法院是否扩大了传统的人权原则。在回答这些问题时,本文通过判例法探讨了法院在保护环境中对生命权进行适当评估的方法。同样,本文采用了一种教条主义的法律研究方法。理论上的法律方法是基于问题的,包括根据研究工作的目标和目的对法律进行分析和对基本问题进行概念澄清。因此,在本文的目标范围内,采用了理论研究的方法来分析健康环境权,以及利用生命权预防环境污染和改善健康环境的司法途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信