Significance of morphological markers of chromosomal instability in differentiating malignant and benign effusions: A pilot study in rural central India

A. Deshmukh, Akshay Yadav, V. Shivkumar
{"title":"Significance of morphological markers of chromosomal instability in differentiating malignant and benign effusions: A pilot study in rural central India","authors":"A. Deshmukh, Akshay Yadav, V. Shivkumar","doi":"10.4103/jcrp.jcrp_3_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chromosomal instability (CI) is critical for carcinogenesis. The morphological markers of CI include multipolar mitosis (MPM), chromatin bridge (CB), micronuclei (MN), and nuclear bud (NB). These represent an underlying genetic instability and can be studied in routine cytological specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of morphological markers of CI in differentiating malignant and benign effusion smears. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational pilot study, 25 cases of benign and 25 cases of malignant effusion smears were selected. All of the malignant cases were reconfirmed by histopathology for primary sites. One thousand cells in May–Grunwald–Giemsa-stained smears were counted for MPM, CB, MN, and NB. The significance of these markers of CI was compared between the benign and malignant cases. Results: The mean numbers of MPM, CB, MN, and NB in malignant cases were 10.52, 7.72, 1.36, and 0.40 per 1000 cells counted, compared to 0.7, 0.5, 0.3, and 0 per 1000 cells counted in benign cases, respectively. The Student's t-test showed highly significant differences between the benign and malignant effusion smears for the CI markers, with P < 0.000001, < 0.000001, and <0.00001 for MN, NB, and MPM, respectively. Conclusion: There were significant differences in the scores of morphological markers of CI in cytological smears between malignant and benign effusions. This is a convenient and reliable method to differentiate between malignant and benign effusions and can be used in conjunction with cytomorphology if a larger study is able to establish the significance in effusions.","PeriodicalId":31219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"97 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrp.jcrp_3_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Chromosomal instability (CI) is critical for carcinogenesis. The morphological markers of CI include multipolar mitosis (MPM), chromatin bridge (CB), micronuclei (MN), and nuclear bud (NB). These represent an underlying genetic instability and can be studied in routine cytological specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of morphological markers of CI in differentiating malignant and benign effusion smears. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational pilot study, 25 cases of benign and 25 cases of malignant effusion smears were selected. All of the malignant cases were reconfirmed by histopathology for primary sites. One thousand cells in May–Grunwald–Giemsa-stained smears were counted for MPM, CB, MN, and NB. The significance of these markers of CI was compared between the benign and malignant cases. Results: The mean numbers of MPM, CB, MN, and NB in malignant cases were 10.52, 7.72, 1.36, and 0.40 per 1000 cells counted, compared to 0.7, 0.5, 0.3, and 0 per 1000 cells counted in benign cases, respectively. The Student's t-test showed highly significant differences between the benign and malignant effusion smears for the CI markers, with P < 0.000001, < 0.000001, and <0.00001 for MN, NB, and MPM, respectively. Conclusion: There were significant differences in the scores of morphological markers of CI in cytological smears between malignant and benign effusions. This is a convenient and reliable method to differentiate between malignant and benign effusions and can be used in conjunction with cytomorphology if a larger study is able to establish the significance in effusions.
染色体不稳定的形态学标志物在鉴别良恶性积液中的意义:印度中部农村的一项初步研究
背景:染色体不稳定性(CI)是致癌的关键。CI的形态学标志物包括多极有丝分裂(MPM)、染色质桥(CB)、微核(MN)和细胞核芽(NB)。这些代表了潜在的遗传不稳定性,可以在常规细胞学标本中进行研究。本研究的目的是评估CI的形态学标志物在鉴别良恶性积液涂片中的意义。材料和方法:在这项回顾性观察性初步研究中,选择25例良性和25例恶性积液涂片。所有恶性病例均通过原发部位的组织病理学再次确认。5月,对1000个细胞进行了MPM、CB、MN和NB计数——Grunwald-Giemsa染色涂片。比较这些CI标志物在良性和恶性病例中的意义。结果:恶性病例中MPM、CB、MN和NB的平均数分别为10.52、7.72、1.36和0.40/1000个细胞,而良性病例中分别为0.7、0.5、0.3和0/1000个细胞。Student t检验显示,良性和恶性积液涂片中CI标记物的差异非常显著,MN、NB和MPM分别为P<0.000001、<0.000001和<0.00001。结论:恶性和良性渗出液细胞学涂片CI形态学标志物评分存在显著差异。这是区分恶性和良性渗出液的一种方便可靠的方法,如果更大规模的研究能够确定渗出液的意义,则可以与细胞形态学结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: JCRP aims to provide an exchange forum for the cancer researchers and practitioners to publish their timely findings in oncologic disciplines. The scope of the Journal covers basic, translational and clinical research, Cancer Biology, Cancer Immunotherapy, Hemato-oncology, Digestive cancer, Urinary tumor, Germ cell tumor, Breast cancer, Lung cancer, Head and Neck Cancer in a vast range of cancer related topics. The Journal also seeks to enhance and advance the cancer care standards in order to provide cancer patients the best care during the treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信