Evaluation of Metal Artifact Reduction software in Computed Tomography

Q3 Health Professions
Eslam Maamoun, M. Aziz
{"title":"Evaluation of Metal Artifact Reduction software in Computed Tomography","authors":"Eslam Maamoun, M. Aziz","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2019.42734.1638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The image quality of computed tomography (CT) can be seriously lowered by metal implants of patients. These implants are known to exert a significant impact on diagnostic accuracy due to artifacts. The current study aimed to assess the usefulness of Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR) software in the reduction of metal artifacts, in comparison to iterative reconstruction algorithm (IDREAM). Material and Methods: Water phantom with raw chicken leg underwent CT scan (Sinovision, Insitum 16) before (reference group (GPref) and after metal implantation: ((GPA (IDREAM without MAR) and GPB(IDREAM with MAR)).  A total number of 30 patients [GP1 (instrumented spine (n=15)), GP2 (Brain clips (n=15))] underwent CT scan (Sinovision ,Insitum 16). GP1 and GP2 were reconstructed using two procedures including IDREAM without MAR vs.  2: IDREAM with MAR. All images were evaluated using subjective and quantitative assessment. Results: In subjective image quality assessment, the scores of MAR images were higher than IDREAM images (P<0.05) as indicated by four radiologists. The absolute CT difference (ΔCT) and Artifact index (AI) demonstrated that MAR appeared to be superior for the reduction of metal artifacts (P<0.05). Conclusion: As evidenced by the obtained results, MAR software can be efficiently used for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography (instrumental spine and brain clips).","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"17 1","pages":"298-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2019.42734.1638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The image quality of computed tomography (CT) can be seriously lowered by metal implants of patients. These implants are known to exert a significant impact on diagnostic accuracy due to artifacts. The current study aimed to assess the usefulness of Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR) software in the reduction of metal artifacts, in comparison to iterative reconstruction algorithm (IDREAM). Material and Methods: Water phantom with raw chicken leg underwent CT scan (Sinovision, Insitum 16) before (reference group (GPref) and after metal implantation: ((GPA (IDREAM without MAR) and GPB(IDREAM with MAR)).  A total number of 30 patients [GP1 (instrumented spine (n=15)), GP2 (Brain clips (n=15))] underwent CT scan (Sinovision ,Insitum 16). GP1 and GP2 were reconstructed using two procedures including IDREAM without MAR vs.  2: IDREAM with MAR. All images were evaluated using subjective and quantitative assessment. Results: In subjective image quality assessment, the scores of MAR images were higher than IDREAM images (P<0.05) as indicated by four radiologists. The absolute CT difference (ΔCT) and Artifact index (AI) demonstrated that MAR appeared to be superior for the reduction of metal artifacts (P<0.05). Conclusion: As evidenced by the obtained results, MAR software can be efficiently used for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography (instrumental spine and brain clips).
计算机断层扫描中金属伪影还原软件的评价
引言:患者的金属植入物会严重降低计算机断层扫描(CT)的图像质量。已知这些植入物由于伪影而对诊断准确性产生重大影响。目前的研究旨在评估金属伪影减少(MAR)软件与迭代重建算法(IDREAM)相比在减少金属伪影方面的有用性。材料和方法:在金属植入前(参考组(GPref)和植入后:(GPA(无MAR的IDREAM)和GPB(有MAR的IDREAM)),对生鸡腿水模型进行了CT扫描(Sinovision,Insitum 16)。共有30名患者接受了CT扫描(Sinovision,Insitum 16)。使用两种程序重建GP1和GP2,包括无MAR的IDREAM与有MAR的2:IDREAM。使用主观和定量评估评估所有图像。结果:四位放射科医生表示,在主观图像质量评估中,MAR图像的得分高于IDREAM图像(P<0.05)。绝对CT差值(ΔCT)和伪影指数(AI)表明,MAR在减少金属伪影方面表现出优越性(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信