Comparison of the Chemical Composition of Whey Cheeses: Urda And Ricotta

IF 0.4 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Snežana Paskaš, J. Miočinović, M. Savić, Goran Ješić, M. Rašeta, Z. Becskei
{"title":"Comparison of the Chemical Composition of Whey Cheeses: Urda And Ricotta","authors":"Snežana Paskaš, J. Miočinović, M. Savić, Goran Ješić, M. Rašeta, Z. Becskei","doi":"10.2478/macvetrev-2019-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study was conducted to evaluate the nutritional quality of two types of cheese prepared from bovine whey: Urda and Ricotta. Cheeses were examined for chemical parameters and their amino acids profile was determined. The results revealed that the chemical composition of the observed whey cheeses was highly significantly different (p<0.01) from each other. The amounts of dry matter, fat, protein, lactose, ash and salt were higher in Ricotta compared with Urda cheese samples. On the other hand, Urda contained more moisture, fat on a dry matter basis and moisture on a fat-free basis (79.59%, 27.50%, 84.27% versus 69.82%, 21.02%, 74.56%, respectively). Especially higher yield, salt in moisture content and energy values were observed in Ricotta cheese (5.93%, 3.12%, 145.99Kcal/100g versus 4.39%, 2.40%, 108.97Kcal/100g; Ricotta and Urda, respectively). Whey cheeses are a particularly good source of amino acids containing approximately - Ricotta: leucine (1.60g/100g), lysine (1.17g/100g), phenylalanine (0.78g/100g) and followed by threonine (0.77g/100g), while Urda contained leucine (0.80g/100g), lysine (0.45g/100g), threonine (0.68g/100g) and phenylalanine (0.31g/100g). Both cheese varieties contained glutamic and aspartic acid as the predominant non-essential amino acids (Ricotta: 3.91g/100g and 1.68g/100g versus Urda: 1.65g/100g and 0.80g/100g, respectively). Generally, from a nutritional point of view, the investigated whey cheeses could be considered as cheeses with low salt and fat content, as well as cheeses particularly abundant in branched chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine and valine). These results also emphasize their advantages as products that present a cost-effective way of dealing with whey as waste material.","PeriodicalId":18099,"journal":{"name":"Macedonian Veterinary Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"151 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macedonian Veterinary Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2019-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract This study was conducted to evaluate the nutritional quality of two types of cheese prepared from bovine whey: Urda and Ricotta. Cheeses were examined for chemical parameters and their amino acids profile was determined. The results revealed that the chemical composition of the observed whey cheeses was highly significantly different (p<0.01) from each other. The amounts of dry matter, fat, protein, lactose, ash and salt were higher in Ricotta compared with Urda cheese samples. On the other hand, Urda contained more moisture, fat on a dry matter basis and moisture on a fat-free basis (79.59%, 27.50%, 84.27% versus 69.82%, 21.02%, 74.56%, respectively). Especially higher yield, salt in moisture content and energy values were observed in Ricotta cheese (5.93%, 3.12%, 145.99Kcal/100g versus 4.39%, 2.40%, 108.97Kcal/100g; Ricotta and Urda, respectively). Whey cheeses are a particularly good source of amino acids containing approximately - Ricotta: leucine (1.60g/100g), lysine (1.17g/100g), phenylalanine (0.78g/100g) and followed by threonine (0.77g/100g), while Urda contained leucine (0.80g/100g), lysine (0.45g/100g), threonine (0.68g/100g) and phenylalanine (0.31g/100g). Both cheese varieties contained glutamic and aspartic acid as the predominant non-essential amino acids (Ricotta: 3.91g/100g and 1.68g/100g versus Urda: 1.65g/100g and 0.80g/100g, respectively). Generally, from a nutritional point of view, the investigated whey cheeses could be considered as cheeses with low salt and fat content, as well as cheeses particularly abundant in branched chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine and valine). These results also emphasize their advantages as products that present a cost-effective way of dealing with whey as waste material.
乳清干酪化学成分的比较:乌达干酪和乳清干酪
摘要本试验旨在评价以牛乳清为原料制备的乌尔达和乳清奶酪的营养品质。对奶酪的化学参数进行了检测,并测定了它们的氨基酸谱。结果表明,各乳清奶酪的化学成分差异极显著(p<0.01)。乳清干酪的干物质、脂肪、蛋白质、乳糖、灰分和盐的含量高于乌达干酪。乌尔达的干物质水分、脂肪含量和无脂肪水分含量分别为79.59%、27.50%、84.27%和69.82%、21.02%、74.56%。乳清干酪的产率、含盐量和能值分别为5.93%、3.12%、145.99Kcal/100g和4.39%、2.40%、108.97Kcal/100g;分别是Ricotta和Urda)。乳清奶酪是一种特别好的氨基酸来源,大约含有乳清干酪:亮氨酸(1.60g/100g)、赖氨酸(1.17g/100g)、苯丙氨酸(0.78g/100g),其次是苏氨酸(0.77g/100g),而乌达干酪含有亮氨酸(0.80g/100g)、赖氨酸(0.45g/100g)、苏氨酸(0.68g/100g)和苯丙氨酸(0.31g/100g)。两种奶酪的主要非必需氨基酸均为谷氨酸和天冬氨酸(Ricotta: 3.91g/100g和1.68g/100g, Urda: 1.65g/100g和0.80g/100g)。一般来说,从营养学的角度来看,所研究的乳清奶酪可以被认为是低盐、低脂肪的奶酪,以及支链氨基酸(亮氨酸、异亮氨酸和缬氨酸)含量特别丰富的奶酪。这些结果也强调了它们作为产品的优势,提出了一种具有成本效益的方法来处理乳清作为废物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Macedonian Veterinary Review
Macedonian Veterinary Review Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信