Introducing and practising ‘curating’ for contemporary Chinese art: The transnational trajectory of Lu Jie from London to China and the development of Long March: A Walking Visual Display

IF 0.3 0 ART
Nie Xiaoyi
{"title":"Introducing and practising ‘curating’ for contemporary Chinese art: The transnational trajectory of Lu Jie from London to China and the development of Long March: A Walking Visual Display","authors":"Nie Xiaoyi","doi":"10.1386/jcca_00067_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through a close reading of the curatorial project Long March: A Walking Visual Display (), this article considers that Long March was an experimental curatorial response to the conditions of contemporary Chinese art and contributes to introducing the discourse and practice of ‘curating’ to China. Tracing the main curator Lu Jie’s curatorial motivation, this research looks into what Lu has termed ‘the dilemma of contemporary Chinese art’ during the 1990s – the division of discourses from realities and artistic practices in the curating of contemporary Chinese art, which led to invalid transcultural communication in international exhibitions. This research paid special attention to Lu’s study in the ‘Creative Curating’ MA programme at Goldsmiths, University of London (1998–99), which encouraged Lu to experiment with alternative exhibition formats and review art in visual culture. These inspired Lu to relocate ‘contemporary Chinese art’ from the institutional context to its original realities in China along the historical route of the Long March. Analysing the development of Lu’s curatorial proposal Long March: A Walking Exhibition from 1999 to 2001, this research shows how the main elements of Lu’s curating shifted from objects to participants and argues the project’s curatorial intention to provoke participants was a process of localizing ‘curating’ in the Chinese context. Instead of assuming that ‘curating’ was imported into China from the West, this article views the introduction of ‘curating’ as a new discipline which helps local practitioners identify the artistic values and authorship in making art public.","PeriodicalId":40969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jcca_00067_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through a close reading of the curatorial project Long March: A Walking Visual Display (), this article considers that Long March was an experimental curatorial response to the conditions of contemporary Chinese art and contributes to introducing the discourse and practice of ‘curating’ to China. Tracing the main curator Lu Jie’s curatorial motivation, this research looks into what Lu has termed ‘the dilemma of contemporary Chinese art’ during the 1990s – the division of discourses from realities and artistic practices in the curating of contemporary Chinese art, which led to invalid transcultural communication in international exhibitions. This research paid special attention to Lu’s study in the ‘Creative Curating’ MA programme at Goldsmiths, University of London (1998–99), which encouraged Lu to experiment with alternative exhibition formats and review art in visual culture. These inspired Lu to relocate ‘contemporary Chinese art’ from the institutional context to its original realities in China along the historical route of the Long March. Analysing the development of Lu’s curatorial proposal Long March: A Walking Exhibition from 1999 to 2001, this research shows how the main elements of Lu’s curating shifted from objects to participants and argues the project’s curatorial intention to provoke participants was a process of localizing ‘curating’ in the Chinese context. Instead of assuming that ‘curating’ was imported into China from the West, this article views the introduction of ‘curating’ as a new discipline which helps local practitioners identify the artistic values and authorship in making art public.
介绍和实践中国当代艺术的“策展”:陆杰从伦敦到中国的跨国轨迹与《长征:行走的视觉展示》的发展
通过细读策展项目《长征:行走的视觉展示》(),本文认为长征是对中国当代艺术条件的实验性策展回应,有助于将“策展”的话语和实践引入中国。本研究追踪了主要策展人陆杰的策展动机,探讨了陆杰在20世纪90年代所说的“中国当代艺术的困境”——中国当代艺术策展中的话语与现实和艺术实践的分裂,导致国际展览中的跨文化交流无效。这项研究特别关注了鲁在伦敦大学金匠学院“创意策展”硕士课程(1998-2009)中的研究,该课程鼓励鲁尝试其他展览形式,并回顾视觉文化中的艺术。这激发了鲁沿着长征的历史路线,将“当代中国艺术”从制度语境中重新定位到中国的原始现实中。本研究通过分析鲁策展建议《长征:行走的展览》从1999年到2001年的发展历程,揭示了鲁策展的主要元素是如何从对象转向参与者的,并认为该项目激发参与者的策展意图是一个在中国语境下“策展”本土化的过程。本文没有假设“策展”是从西方传入中国的,而是将“策展学”的引入视为一门新学科,帮助当地从业者在公开艺术时识别艺术价值和作者身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信