Analysis of KRAS and NRAS mutations in Greek patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) on the registry of the Gastro-intestinal Cancer Study Group (GIC-SG)

Q4 Medicine
N. Gouvas, Telenia Kalambaliki, A. Voutsina, Z. Saridaki, M. Tzardi, A. Kalykaki, M. Sfakianaki, A. Athanasiadis, E. Xynos, I. Boukovinas, J. Souglakos
{"title":"Analysis of KRAS and NRAS mutations in Greek patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) on the registry of the Gastro-intestinal Cancer Study Group (GIC-SG)","authors":"N. Gouvas, Telenia Kalambaliki, A. Voutsina, Z. Saridaki, M. Tzardi, A. Kalykaki, M. Sfakianaki, A. Athanasiadis, E. Xynos, I. Boukovinas, J. Souglakos","doi":"10.2478/fco-2018-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Several studies show that mutational profiles could influence treatment decisions in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). KRAS mutational status was the first step in biomarkers development in the era of molecular targeted therapies. Recently, NRAS mutational status was identified as an independent prognostic factor for the response to treatment with anti-EGFR moAbs. The aim of this observational study was to assess the feasibility of the KRAS/NRAS mutational analysis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece and to identify any correlations with known clinical characteristics and histopathologic features. Methods From January 2014 until September 2014 all patients registered to the GIC-SG database with newly diagnosed metastatic disease from colon or rectal cancer were included and tumor samples were analyzed for kras/nras mutations in 9 different certified laboratories in Greece. Results Samples from 510 patients were analyzed. Mutations’ distribution was as follows: 173 (33,9%) KRAS exon 2, 10 (2%) KRAS exon 3, 25 (4,9%) KRAS exon 4, 22 (4,3%) NRAS exon 2, 11 (2,2%) NRAS exon 3 and 3 (0,6%) NRAS exon 4. The only factor significantly associated with RAS mutational status was primary tumor location, with right sided tumors exhibiting higher rates of mutations. Discussion The incidence and distribution of KRAS or NRAS exon 2-4 mutations are in accordance with those reported in the literature. The most significant clinical or pathological parameter revealed from the analysis is the location of the primary tumor.","PeriodicalId":38592,"journal":{"name":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","volume":"9 1","pages":"31 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fco-2018-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Several studies show that mutational profiles could influence treatment decisions in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). KRAS mutational status was the first step in biomarkers development in the era of molecular targeted therapies. Recently, NRAS mutational status was identified as an independent prognostic factor for the response to treatment with anti-EGFR moAbs. The aim of this observational study was to assess the feasibility of the KRAS/NRAS mutational analysis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece and to identify any correlations with known clinical characteristics and histopathologic features. Methods From January 2014 until September 2014 all patients registered to the GIC-SG database with newly diagnosed metastatic disease from colon or rectal cancer were included and tumor samples were analyzed for kras/nras mutations in 9 different certified laboratories in Greece. Results Samples from 510 patients were analyzed. Mutations’ distribution was as follows: 173 (33,9%) KRAS exon 2, 10 (2%) KRAS exon 3, 25 (4,9%) KRAS exon 4, 22 (4,3%) NRAS exon 2, 11 (2,2%) NRAS exon 3 and 3 (0,6%) NRAS exon 4. The only factor significantly associated with RAS mutational status was primary tumor location, with right sided tumors exhibiting higher rates of mutations. Discussion The incidence and distribution of KRAS or NRAS exon 2-4 mutations are in accordance with those reported in the literature. The most significant clinical or pathological parameter revealed from the analysis is the location of the primary tumor.
希腊转移性癌症(mCRC)患者的KRAS和NRAS突变在胃肠道癌症研究组(GIC-SG)注册中的分析
摘要引言几项研究表明,突变谱可能影响转移性CRC(mCRC)患者的治疗决定。KRAS突变状态是分子靶向治疗时代生物标志物开发的第一步。最近,NRAS突变状态被确定为抗EGFR-moAbs治疗反应的独立预后因素。这项观察性研究的目的是评估KRAS/NRAS突变分析在希腊转移性癌症患者中的可行性,并确定与已知临床特征和组织病理学特征的相关性。方法从2014年1月至2014年9月,纳入GIC-SG数据库中登记的所有新诊断为结肠癌或直肠癌转移性疾病的患者,并对希腊9个不同认证实验室的肿瘤样本进行kras/nras突变分析。结果对510例患者的标本进行了分析。突变的分布如下:173(33,9%)个KRAS外显子2,10(2%)个KRAS外显子3,25(4,9%)个KRAS1外显子4,22(4,3%)个NRAS1外隐子2,11(2,2%)个NRAS3和3(0,6%)个NRAS外显子4。与RAS突变状态显著相关的唯一因素是原发性肿瘤的位置,右侧肿瘤的突变率较高。讨论KRAS或NRAS外显子2-4突变的发生率和分布与文献报道的一致。从分析中揭示的最重要的临床或病理参数是原发肿瘤的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forum of Clinical Oncology
Forum of Clinical Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信