Retrospective analysis of efficacy of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria and the Canadian cervical spine rules for cervical spine trauma

K. Pawan Kumar, P. Madhuchandra, G. Santhosh
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of efficacy of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria and the Canadian cervical spine rules for cervical spine trauma","authors":"K. Pawan Kumar, P. Madhuchandra, G. Santhosh","doi":"10.4103/jodp.jodp_96_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With increasing road traffic accidents, cervical spine injuries are a major health hazard in the developed as well as the developing world. Over the years, the National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low-risk criteria and the Canadian cervical spine rules (CCRs) have acted as primary guidelines in emergency departments around the world to decide on the need for cervical spine X-ray in emergency settings. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the efficiency of both the NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR in confirming positive cervical spine injuries in emergency department settings. Aims and Objectives: The aim was to retrospectively analyze the efficiency of both the NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR in confirming positive cervical spine injuries. Methods: A retrospective study involving 631 patients for 4 years aged above 18 years, who underwent a cervical spine X-ray from June 2018 to June 2022, were included in the study. From the eligible case records, the data pertaining to the NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR were recorded. Along with this, the final diagnosis regarding the cervical spine injury, confirmed by subsequent computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was also recorded. Results: The NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR were met in 92.7% and 98.6% of the patients, respectively. The cervical spine X-rays were normal in 87.8% of the patients, fractures were recorded in 9.5% of the patients, and in 2.7% of the patients, doubtful lesions were present, which needed additional investigations in the form of CT scan or MRI or both. Conclusion: Both the Nexus and CCR guidelines act as a good guiding light in deciding about the need for the cervical spine X-ray in the emergency setup. Both guidelines are effective in ruling out cervical spine injuries in the majority of cases.","PeriodicalId":34809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","volume":"6 1","pages":"154 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jodp.jodp_96_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With increasing road traffic accidents, cervical spine injuries are a major health hazard in the developed as well as the developing world. Over the years, the National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low-risk criteria and the Canadian cervical spine rules (CCRs) have acted as primary guidelines in emergency departments around the world to decide on the need for cervical spine X-ray in emergency settings. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the efficiency of both the NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR in confirming positive cervical spine injuries in emergency department settings. Aims and Objectives: The aim was to retrospectively analyze the efficiency of both the NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR in confirming positive cervical spine injuries. Methods: A retrospective study involving 631 patients for 4 years aged above 18 years, who underwent a cervical spine X-ray from June 2018 to June 2022, were included in the study. From the eligible case records, the data pertaining to the NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR were recorded. Along with this, the final diagnosis regarding the cervical spine injury, confirmed by subsequent computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was also recorded. Results: The NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR were met in 92.7% and 98.6% of the patients, respectively. The cervical spine X-rays were normal in 87.8% of the patients, fractures were recorded in 9.5% of the patients, and in 2.7% of the patients, doubtful lesions were present, which needed additional investigations in the form of CT scan or MRI or both. Conclusion: Both the Nexus and CCR guidelines act as a good guiding light in deciding about the need for the cervical spine X-ray in the emergency setup. Both guidelines are effective in ruling out cervical spine injuries in the majority of cases.
国家紧急x线摄影应用研究低风险标准和加拿大颈椎规则对颈椎外伤疗效的回顾性分析
背景:随着道路交通事故的增加,颈椎损伤在发达国家和发展中国家都是一个主要的健康危害。多年来,国家紧急x线摄影利用研究(NEXUS)低风险标准和加拿大颈椎规则(CCRs)已成为世界各地急诊科决定在紧急情况下是否需要颈椎x线检查的主要指南。本研究的目的是回顾性分析NEXUS低风险标准和CCR在急诊科确认阳性颈椎损伤的效率。目的和目的:回顾性分析NEXUS低风险标准和CCR在确认阳性颈椎损伤方面的效率。方法:回顾性研究纳入2018年6月至2022年6月期间接受颈椎x线检查的631例年龄在18岁以上的4岁患者。从符合条件的病例记录中,记录有关NEXUS低风险标准和CCR的数据。与此同时,通过随后的计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)确认颈椎损伤的最终诊断也被记录下来。结果:92.7%的患者符合NEXUS低危标准,98.6%的患者符合CCR标准。87.8%的患者颈椎x线检查正常,9.5%的患者骨折,2.7%的患者存在可疑病变,需要通过CT或MRI或两者的形式进行进一步检查。结论:Nexus指南和CCR指南在决定急诊情况下是否需要颈椎x线检查方面具有良好的指导作用。在大多数情况下,这两种指南在排除颈椎损伤方面都是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信