Congruence and Discrepancy Between Observation and Teachers’ Self-Report of Inquiry-Based Instruction

IF 0.7 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Katarína Kotuľáková, M. Orolínová, Natália Priškinová, Romana Schubertová, Renáta Tóthová
{"title":"Congruence and Discrepancy Between Observation and Teachers’ Self-Report of Inquiry-Based Instruction","authors":"Katarína Kotuľáková, M. Orolínová, Natália Priškinová, Romana Schubertová, Renáta Tóthová","doi":"10.2478/cdem-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Opportunities for self-reflection and collaborative reflection support inquiry-based teaching. The presented study focuses on retrospective self-reports of 14 science teachers about teaching inquiry lessons in their regular science classes. Their self-reports were compared with observation reports of researchers. Data from semi-structured interviews were added. The results indicate that teachers overestimated their performance in the class in all observed areas of inquiry instruction. The most misinterpreted and overestimated area by teachers seems to be formulating research questions, analysing data and drawing conclusions, which are the most effective processes in student learning. Based on the results of the study, several implications are suggested in order to focus on the self-reflective skills of teachers.","PeriodicalId":41079,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology","volume":"27 1","pages":"123 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cdem-2022-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Opportunities for self-reflection and collaborative reflection support inquiry-based teaching. The presented study focuses on retrospective self-reports of 14 science teachers about teaching inquiry lessons in their regular science classes. Their self-reports were compared with observation reports of researchers. Data from semi-structured interviews were added. The results indicate that teachers overestimated their performance in the class in all observed areas of inquiry instruction. The most misinterpreted and overestimated area by teachers seems to be formulating research questions, analysing data and drawing conclusions, which are the most effective processes in student learning. Based on the results of the study, several implications are suggested in order to focus on the self-reflective skills of teachers.
探究教学中观察与教师自我报告的异同
自我反思和合作反思的机会支持探究式教学。本研究的重点是对14名科学教师在常规科学课上教授探究课的回顾性自我报告。他们的自我报告与研究人员的观察报告进行了比较。增加了半结构化访谈的数据。结果表明,在探究教学的所有观察领域,教师都高估了自己在课堂上的表现。教师最误解和高估的领域似乎是制定研究问题、分析数据和得出结论,这是学生学习中最有效的过程。基于研究结果,提出了几点启示,以关注教师的自我反思技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology
Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信