Employee Participation Rights During Company Restructuring: Lessons Learned from the “Capability for Voice” in British Law

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Migen Dibra
{"title":"Employee Participation Rights During Company Restructuring: Lessons Learned from the “Capability for Voice” in British Law","authors":"Migen Dibra","doi":"10.7202/1081842AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current economic context, marked by a growing number of company restructuring processes as well as a rising unemployment rate, it seems important to address the employee’s issue of job security as well as the need to reduce the negative impacts that some restructuring processes have on businesses and employees. One solution in this regard is to ensure that employees are heard during the restructuring process. Since the Quebec and the federal Canadian legal frameworks on the subject offer insufficient protections, the author’s goal is to find solutions in order to strengthen the existing frameworks as well as to suggest different ways of adopting other legal information and consultation procedures applicable to company restructuring in general. To this end, the author is interested in whether a process of information and consultation of employees in restructuring matters, similar to what exists in the European Union, is possible in Canada, in light of the British experience. In fact, the United Kingdom’s case is particularly interesting for Canada, because this country originally applied a collective laissez-faire approach to employee participation rights during company restructuring which was similar to the North American one. It was only because of mandatory directives of the European Union on the subject that the United Kingdom has set up information and consultation procedures recognized by law. In order to perform this study, we have used the method of comparative law and as a theoretical framework we have applied the capability for voice, developed by Amartya Sen, which provides a method for assessing the impact and relevance of Parliament acts that recognize extended participation rights to employees in regard to a company’s economic decisions. In doing so, we assess the extent that the British statutory instruments, related to the subject matter under study, meet the conditions of the capability for voice, which are prerequisites to pass from the involvement stage of the employees in company decisions to their real influence on such issues.","PeriodicalId":42153,"journal":{"name":"Revue General de Droit","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue General de Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1081842AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current economic context, marked by a growing number of company restructuring processes as well as a rising unemployment rate, it seems important to address the employee’s issue of job security as well as the need to reduce the negative impacts that some restructuring processes have on businesses and employees. One solution in this regard is to ensure that employees are heard during the restructuring process. Since the Quebec and the federal Canadian legal frameworks on the subject offer insufficient protections, the author’s goal is to find solutions in order to strengthen the existing frameworks as well as to suggest different ways of adopting other legal information and consultation procedures applicable to company restructuring in general. To this end, the author is interested in whether a process of information and consultation of employees in restructuring matters, similar to what exists in the European Union, is possible in Canada, in light of the British experience. In fact, the United Kingdom’s case is particularly interesting for Canada, because this country originally applied a collective laissez-faire approach to employee participation rights during company restructuring which was similar to the North American one. It was only because of mandatory directives of the European Union on the subject that the United Kingdom has set up information and consultation procedures recognized by law. In order to perform this study, we have used the method of comparative law and as a theoretical framework we have applied the capability for voice, developed by Amartya Sen, which provides a method for assessing the impact and relevance of Parliament acts that recognize extended participation rights to employees in regard to a company’s economic decisions. In doing so, we assess the extent that the British statutory instruments, related to the subject matter under study, meet the conditions of the capability for voice, which are prerequisites to pass from the involvement stage of the employees in company decisions to their real influence on such issues.
公司重组中的员工参与权:英国法中“话语权”的启示
在当前的经济背景下,以越来越多的公司重组过程和不断上升的失业率为标志,解决员工的工作保障问题以及减少一些重组过程对企业和员工的负面影响的需要似乎很重要。在这方面的一个解决方案是确保在重组过程中听取员工的意见。由于魁北克省和加拿大联邦关于这一问题的法律框架提供的保护不足,作者的目标是找到解决办法,以加强现有框架,并建议采用适用于一般公司重组的其他法律信息和咨询程序的不同方式。为此目的,作者感兴趣的是,参照英国的经验,加拿大是否有可能在重组事项中建立一个类似于欧洲联盟的雇员信息和协商过程。事实上,英国的案例对加拿大来说特别有趣,因为这个国家最初在公司重组期间对员工参与权采取了集体自由放任的做法,这与北美的做法类似。只是由于欧洲联盟在这个问题上的强制性指令,联合王国才建立了法律承认的信息和协商程序。为了进行这项研究,我们使用了比较法的方法,作为一个理论框架,我们应用了由Amartya Sen开发的声音能力,它提供了一种方法来评估议会法案的影响和相关性,这些法案承认员工在公司经济决策方面的扩展参与权。在此过程中,我们评估了与所研究主题相关的英国法定文书在多大程度上满足发言权的条件,这些条件是员工从参与公司决策阶段过渡到对此类问题产生实际影响的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信