Coronary artery bypass grafting after iatrogenic coronary artery dissection: A single center eight years' experience
IF 0.2
Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
M. Yeşiltaş, Ali Aycan Kavala, Saygin Turkyilmaz, Yusuf Kuserli, H. Toz, Onur Emre Satilmis
{"title":"Coronary artery bypass grafting after iatrogenic coronary artery dissection: A single center eight years' experience","authors":"M. Yeşiltaş, Ali Aycan Kavala, Saygin Turkyilmaz, Yusuf Kuserli, H. Toz, Onur Emre Satilmis","doi":"10.33678/cor.2022.093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection during diagnostic or therapeutic catheterization is a rare and mortal complication that may result in a newly developed myocardial infarction. In this study, we aimed to share the results of CABG treatment of patients with iatrogenic coronary artery dissection after coronary angiography (CAG) in our clinic. Method(s): All patients who underwent CAG or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital between January 2014 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively and patients who underwent CABG after iatrogenic coronary artery dissection were included in the study. The dissection classification was achived according to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) classification. Result(s): During the eight years, CAG was applied to 20,398 patients and PCI to 9583 patients. Needed to treat CABG in iatrogenic coronary artery dissection developed in 17 of the patients (0.06%). LMCA was dissected in 6 (35.3%) patients and LAD in 6 (35.3%), CX in 2 (11.8%) and RCA dissection in 3 (17.6%). 3 patients (17.6%) had an intubation time longer than 48 hours. One of them has recently had a COVID infection. Another was suffering from pulmonary edema. The other patient died on the 4th postoperative day due to low cardiac output. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was 2 (min: 1 - max: 13) days. The hospital stay was 6 (min: 4 - max: 20) days. Conclusion(s): The development of a critical clinical condition prior to surgery is strongly associated with a higher probability of early and late postoperative death. For this reason, it is clear that the treatments applied at every stage of the pre-, per-, and postoperative period are the most important determinants of the results.Copyright © 2023, CKS.","PeriodicalId":10787,"journal":{"name":"Cor et vasa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cor et vasa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33678/cor.2022.093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection during diagnostic or therapeutic catheterization is a rare and mortal complication that may result in a newly developed myocardial infarction. In this study, we aimed to share the results of CABG treatment of patients with iatrogenic coronary artery dissection after coronary angiography (CAG) in our clinic. Method(s): All patients who underwent CAG or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital between January 2014 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively and patients who underwent CABG after iatrogenic coronary artery dissection were included in the study. The dissection classification was achived according to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) classification. Result(s): During the eight years, CAG was applied to 20,398 patients and PCI to 9583 patients. Needed to treat CABG in iatrogenic coronary artery dissection developed in 17 of the patients (0.06%). LMCA was dissected in 6 (35.3%) patients and LAD in 6 (35.3%), CX in 2 (11.8%) and RCA dissection in 3 (17.6%). 3 patients (17.6%) had an intubation time longer than 48 hours. One of them has recently had a COVID infection. Another was suffering from pulmonary edema. The other patient died on the 4th postoperative day due to low cardiac output. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was 2 (min: 1 - max: 13) days. The hospital stay was 6 (min: 4 - max: 20) days. Conclusion(s): The development of a critical clinical condition prior to surgery is strongly associated with a higher probability of early and late postoperative death. For this reason, it is clear that the treatments applied at every stage of the pre-, per-, and postoperative period are the most important determinants of the results.Copyright © 2023, CKS.
医源性冠状动脉夹层后冠状动脉旁路移植术:单中心8年经验
背景:医源性冠状动脉剥离在诊断或治疗性置管期间是一种罕见的致命并发症,可能导致新发展的心肌梗死。在本研究中,我们的目的是分享我院临床冠状动脉造影(CAG)后医源性冠状动脉夹层患者冠状动脉搭桥治疗的结果。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2021年12月在我院行冠状动脉造影(CAG)或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者,纳入医源性冠状动脉夹层后行冠状动脉造影(CABG)的患者。解剖分类依据国家心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)分类实现。结果:8年间,CAG应用20398例,PCI应用9583例。17例(0.06%)患者发生医源性冠状动脉夹层,需行冠脉搭桥治疗。LMCA夹层6例(35.3%),LAD夹层6例(35.3%),CX夹层2例(11.8%),RCA夹层3例(17.6%)。3例(17.6%)患者插管时间超过48小时。其中一人最近感染了新冠病毒。另一位患有肺水肿。1例患者术后第4天因低心排血量死亡。重症监护病房的住院时间为2天(最短1天-最长13天)。住院时间6天(最短4天,最长20天)。结论:手术前危重临床状况的发生与术后早期和晚期死亡的高概率密切相关。由于这个原因,很明显,术前、术后各阶段的治疗是结果的最重要决定因素。版权所有©2023。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。