{"title":"Computational approaches in assessments of mixture toxicity","authors":"Supratik Kar, Jerzy Leszczynski","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2022.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are various paths of interactions of combination of two or more chemicals with biological systems. The response of chemicals in a mixture can be predicted employing the perceptions of concentration or dose addition for chemicals with identical mode of action (MOA) and/or common target of effect. While response addition can be considered for chemicals acting on diverse biological targets. Both hypotheses are feasible only when there is no interaction between chemicals. On the contrary, if interaction occurs between chemicals in a mixture results in synergism or potentiation if induction of activating enzyme/inhibition of detoxifying enzyme happens. In contrast, competition of individual chemicals at biological target site show antagonism. Experimental models are time-consuming and costly. Diversity of mixtures and the necessity to test multiple organisms covering different ecosystems to avail the toxicity data make the experimentalist job more challenging. There comes the importance of computational approaches, proven and efficient alternatives to fill the toxicity data gaps, prioritization of chemicals, identification of the toxicity mechanism, and risk assessment and management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"29 ","pages":"Pages 31-35"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202022000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
There are various paths of interactions of combination of two or more chemicals with biological systems. The response of chemicals in a mixture can be predicted employing the perceptions of concentration or dose addition for chemicals with identical mode of action (MOA) and/or common target of effect. While response addition can be considered for chemicals acting on diverse biological targets. Both hypotheses are feasible only when there is no interaction between chemicals. On the contrary, if interaction occurs between chemicals in a mixture results in synergism or potentiation if induction of activating enzyme/inhibition of detoxifying enzyme happens. In contrast, competition of individual chemicals at biological target site show antagonism. Experimental models are time-consuming and costly. Diversity of mixtures and the necessity to test multiple organisms covering different ecosystems to avail the toxicity data make the experimentalist job more challenging. There comes the importance of computational approaches, proven and efficient alternatives to fill the toxicity data gaps, prioritization of chemicals, identification of the toxicity mechanism, and risk assessment and management.
期刊介绍:
The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.