Social Harmfulness of Offences Committed Against Goods Acquired Through Immoral Means

M. Kulik, Marek Mozgawa
{"title":"Social Harmfulness of Offences Committed Against Goods Acquired Through Immoral Means","authors":"M. Kulik, Marek Mozgawa","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.2.2022.10-m.kulik-m.mozgawa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The article discusses the issue of the degree of social harmfulness of acts detrimental to goods obtained through immoral means (specifically, infringement of copyright to legally produced pornographic films). All film productions (also those of a pornographic nature) are works within the meaning of the Polish Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights. The protection of rights to them is not limited by any moral assessments, but by objectively verifiable features of the work. For legal pornographic works, while their content itself may be regarded as controversial or even unacceptable from the point of view of social norms, the assessment of the social harmfulness of the act is determined not by their content but by the degree of the infringement of the object of protection. The moral assessment of the content contained in the work is irrelevant, if the content is in itself legal and disseminated lawfully, because the protection of non-property rights and, in particular, property rights to a work is not about the protection of the content of those works, but about the author’s rights. The finding that the act involved the dissemination of a someone else’s pornographic work cannot serve as a basis for considering the degree of social harmfulness of the offence as negligible. It is only the degree of copyright infringement that matters in the specific case.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"7 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.2.2022.10-m.kulik-m.mozgawa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The article discusses the issue of the degree of social harmfulness of acts detrimental to goods obtained through immoral means (specifically, infringement of copyright to legally produced pornographic films). All film productions (also those of a pornographic nature) are works within the meaning of the Polish Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights. The protection of rights to them is not limited by any moral assessments, but by objectively verifiable features of the work. For legal pornographic works, while their content itself may be regarded as controversial or even unacceptable from the point of view of social norms, the assessment of the social harmfulness of the act is determined not by their content but by the degree of the infringement of the object of protection. The moral assessment of the content contained in the work is irrelevant, if the content is in itself legal and disseminated lawfully, because the protection of non-property rights and, in particular, property rights to a work is not about the protection of the content of those works, but about the author’s rights. The finding that the act involved the dissemination of a someone else’s pornographic work cannot serve as a basis for considering the degree of social harmfulness of the offence as negligible. It is only the degree of copyright infringement that matters in the specific case.
侵害通过不道德手段获得的物品犯罪的社会危害性
摘要本文讨论了通过不道德手段(特别是侵犯合法制作的色情电影的版权)获得的有害商品行为的社会危害程度问题。所有电影制作(也包括色情性质的电影制作)都是1994年2月4日《波兰版权和相关权利法》所指的作品。保护他们的权利不受任何道德评估的限制,而是受作品可客观核实的特点的限制。对于合法的色情作品,虽然从社会规范的角度来看,其内容本身可能被认为是有争议的,甚至是不可接受的,但对该行为的社会危害性的评估不是由其内容决定的,而是由保护对象的侵权程度决定的。如果作品中的内容本身是合法的和合法传播的,那么对作品中所含内容的道德评估是无关紧要的,因为保护非财产权,特别是作品的财产权,不是保护这些作品的内容,而是保护作者的权利。认定该行为涉及传播他人的色情作品,不能作为将该罪行的社会危害程度视为可忽略不计的依据。在具体案件中,侵犯版权的程度才是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信