John A. Williams III, Valerie Hill-Jackson, Cassidy Caldwell, C. Craig
{"title":"Teacher Recruitment and Retention: Local Strategies, Global Inspiration","authors":"John A. Williams III, Valerie Hill-Jackson, Cassidy Caldwell, C. Craig","doi":"10.1177/00224871221118155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although teacher workforce and labor market concerns have dominated the field of teacher education for decades in the United States (Darling-Hammond et al., 2017; Garcia et al., 2022), the teacher shortage crisis is a worldwide conundrum. “Even where general teacher supply and demand are in balance, many countries face shortages of specialist teachers and shortages in schools serving disadvantaged or isolated communities” (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], 2011, p. 10). Student achievement correlates to the economic and societal advancement of nations (Hanushek, 2013), and an effective teacher workforce is pivotal to student learning. Studies confirm that teacher quality is the central school-based predictor of student achievement (Lasley et al., 2006; Vagi et al., 2019) and that years of uninterrupted and efficacious teaching can counteract the learning deficits of students placed at risk (Chetty et al., 2011; Freedman & Appleman, 2009). Although the motivating factors for teachers choosing to enter or stay in a school have changed over the last few decades—usually around issues of turnover brought about by school conditions (Craig, 2020; Geiger & Pivovarova, 2018; Ingersoll et al., 2018), few opportunities for advancement (Guha et al., 2017), burnout (Saloviita & Pakarinen, 2021), lack of prestige (Matete, 2021, Lee et al., 2020), limited autonomy (Warner-Griffin et al., 2018), challenging student behavior in the classroom (Williams et al., 2020), and poor pay (Allegretto & Mishel, 2018)—the need for more teacher workforce proposals has not. Despite the vast educational, cultural, and scale differences among our teacher preparation programs around the world, we find that our dilemmas in teacher recruitment and retention are fundamentally similar in nature. Schools worldwide have greater difficulty in recruiting novice teachers (Ingersoll et al., 2018; O’Doherty & Harford, 2018; Perryman & Calvert, 2020) and offering competitive packages to support and retain teachers beyond their initial years in the field. Modernizing the ways we offer meaningful professional incentives to nurture and retain beginning and effective teachers remains top of mind for international practitioners and researchers in the field of teacher education. This editorial is divided into two parts. First, the editors of the Journal of Teacher Education propose that global challenges in teacher education require international collaboration. Although teacher labor issues are best addressed at the regional or local level, educationalists should commit to identifying solutions (read as an orientation toward challenge, Hallman et al., 2022) that are born out of the international exchange of ideas. The suffusion of ideas from the global to the local, and from the local to the global, may bring to bear our best thinking to stem the teacher recruitment and retention crisis. Second, and to demonstrate this point, we highlight four regional examples that showcase teacher education practices specific to teacher recruitment and retention that can be reconsidered as long-standing strategies.","PeriodicalId":17162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"73 1","pages":"333 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221118155","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Although teacher workforce and labor market concerns have dominated the field of teacher education for decades in the United States (Darling-Hammond et al., 2017; Garcia et al., 2022), the teacher shortage crisis is a worldwide conundrum. “Even where general teacher supply and demand are in balance, many countries face shortages of specialist teachers and shortages in schools serving disadvantaged or isolated communities” (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], 2011, p. 10). Student achievement correlates to the economic and societal advancement of nations (Hanushek, 2013), and an effective teacher workforce is pivotal to student learning. Studies confirm that teacher quality is the central school-based predictor of student achievement (Lasley et al., 2006; Vagi et al., 2019) and that years of uninterrupted and efficacious teaching can counteract the learning deficits of students placed at risk (Chetty et al., 2011; Freedman & Appleman, 2009). Although the motivating factors for teachers choosing to enter or stay in a school have changed over the last few decades—usually around issues of turnover brought about by school conditions (Craig, 2020; Geiger & Pivovarova, 2018; Ingersoll et al., 2018), few opportunities for advancement (Guha et al., 2017), burnout (Saloviita & Pakarinen, 2021), lack of prestige (Matete, 2021, Lee et al., 2020), limited autonomy (Warner-Griffin et al., 2018), challenging student behavior in the classroom (Williams et al., 2020), and poor pay (Allegretto & Mishel, 2018)—the need for more teacher workforce proposals has not. Despite the vast educational, cultural, and scale differences among our teacher preparation programs around the world, we find that our dilemmas in teacher recruitment and retention are fundamentally similar in nature. Schools worldwide have greater difficulty in recruiting novice teachers (Ingersoll et al., 2018; O’Doherty & Harford, 2018; Perryman & Calvert, 2020) and offering competitive packages to support and retain teachers beyond their initial years in the field. Modernizing the ways we offer meaningful professional incentives to nurture and retain beginning and effective teachers remains top of mind for international practitioners and researchers in the field of teacher education. This editorial is divided into two parts. First, the editors of the Journal of Teacher Education propose that global challenges in teacher education require international collaboration. Although teacher labor issues are best addressed at the regional or local level, educationalists should commit to identifying solutions (read as an orientation toward challenge, Hallman et al., 2022) that are born out of the international exchange of ideas. The suffusion of ideas from the global to the local, and from the local to the global, may bring to bear our best thinking to stem the teacher recruitment and retention crisis. Second, and to demonstrate this point, we highlight four regional examples that showcase teacher education practices specific to teacher recruitment and retention that can be reconsidered as long-standing strategies.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Teacher Education, the flagship journal of AACTE, is to serve as a research forum for a diverse group of scholars who are invested in the preparation and continued support of teachers and who can have a significant voice in discussions and decision-making around issues of teacher education. One of the fundamental goals of the journal is the use of evidence from rigorous investigation to identify and address the increasingly complex issues confronting teacher education at the national and global levels. These issues include but are not limited to preparing teachers to effectively address the needs of marginalized youth, their families and communities; program design and impact; selection, recruitment and retention of teachers from underrepresented groups; local and national policy; accountability; and routes to certification. JTE does not publish book reviews, program evaluations or articles solely describing programs, program components, courses or personal experiences. In addition, JTE does not accept manuscripts that are solely about the development or validation of an instrument unless the use of that instrument yields data providing new insights into issues of relevance to teacher education (MSU, February 2016).