Identifying the Greatest Earthquakes of the Past 2000 Years at the Nehalem River Estuary, Northern Oregon Coast, USA

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Quaternary Pub Date : 2020-01-14 DOI:10.5334/oq.70
A. Nelson, A. Hawkes, Y. Sawai, S. Engelhart, R. Witter, Wendy C. Grant-Walter, L. Bradley, T. Dura, N. Cahill, B. Horton
{"title":"Identifying the Greatest Earthquakes of the Past 2000 Years at the Nehalem River Estuary, Northern Oregon Coast, USA","authors":"A. Nelson, A. Hawkes, Y. Sawai, S. Engelhart, R. Witter, Wendy C. Grant-Walter, L. Bradley, T. Dura, N. Cahill, B. Horton","doi":"10.5334/oq.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We infer a history of three great megathrust earthquakes during the past 2000 years at the Nehalem River estuary based on the lateral extent of sharp (≤3 mm) peat-mud stratigraphic contacts in cores and outcrops, coseismic subsidence as interpreted from fossil diatom assemblages and reconstructed with foraminiferal assemblages using a Bayesian transfer function, and regional correlation of 14C-modeled ages for the times of subsidence. A subsidence contact from 1700 CE (contact A), sometimes overlain by tsunami-deposited sand, can be traced over distances of 7 km. Contacts B and D, which record subsidence during two earlier megathrust earthquakes, are much less extensive but are traced across a 700-m by 270-m tidal marsh. Although some other Cascadia studies report evidence for an earthquake between contacts B and D, our lack of extensive evidence for such an earthquake may result from the complexities of preserving identifiable evidence of it in the rapidly shifting shoreline environments of the lower river and bay. Ages (95% intervals) and subsidence for contacts are: A, 1700 CE (1.1 ± 0.5 m); B, 942–764 cal a BP (0.7 ± 0.4 m and 1.0 m ± 0.4 m); and D, 1568–1361 cal a BP (1.0 m ± 0.4 m). Comparisons of contact subsidence and the degree of overlap of their modeled ages with ages for other Cascadia sites are consistent with megathrust ruptures many hundreds of kilometers long. But these data cannot conclusively distinguish among different types or lengths of ruptures recorded by the three great earthquake contacts at the Nehalem River estuary.","PeriodicalId":37172,"journal":{"name":"Open Quaternary","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Quaternary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We infer a history of three great megathrust earthquakes during the past 2000 years at the Nehalem River estuary based on the lateral extent of sharp (≤3 mm) peat-mud stratigraphic contacts in cores and outcrops, coseismic subsidence as interpreted from fossil diatom assemblages and reconstructed with foraminiferal assemblages using a Bayesian transfer function, and regional correlation of 14C-modeled ages for the times of subsidence. A subsidence contact from 1700 CE (contact A), sometimes overlain by tsunami-deposited sand, can be traced over distances of 7 km. Contacts B and D, which record subsidence during two earlier megathrust earthquakes, are much less extensive but are traced across a 700-m by 270-m tidal marsh. Although some other Cascadia studies report evidence for an earthquake between contacts B and D, our lack of extensive evidence for such an earthquake may result from the complexities of preserving identifiable evidence of it in the rapidly shifting shoreline environments of the lower river and bay. Ages (95% intervals) and subsidence for contacts are: A, 1700 CE (1.1 ± 0.5 m); B, 942–764 cal a BP (0.7 ± 0.4 m and 1.0 m ± 0.4 m); and D, 1568–1361 cal a BP (1.0 m ± 0.4 m). Comparisons of contact subsidence and the degree of overlap of their modeled ages with ages for other Cascadia sites are consistent with megathrust ruptures many hundreds of kilometers long. But these data cannot conclusively distinguish among different types or lengths of ruptures recorded by the three great earthquake contacts at the Nehalem River estuary.
美国俄勒冈州北部海岸Nehalem河河口过去2000年来最大的地震
根据岩心和露头中尖锐(≤3 mm)泥炭-泥浆地层接触的横向范围、硅藻化石组合解释的同震沉降以及利用贝叶斯传递函数与有孔虫组合重建的同震沉降,以及14c模拟年龄的区域对比,推断了Nehalem河口近2000年来三次大逆冲地震的历史。从公元1700年开始的沉降接触点(接触点A),有时被海啸沉积的沙子覆盖,可以在7公里的距离上追踪到。接触点B和接触点D记录了早期两次大逆冲地震期间的沉降,范围要小得多,但可以追溯到700米乘270米的潮汐沼泽。虽然其他一些卡斯卡迪亚研究报告了在接触点B和接触点D之间发生地震的证据,但我们缺乏关于这种地震的广泛证据,可能是因为在下游河流和海湾快速变化的海岸线环境中保存可识别的证据很复杂。触点年龄(95%间隔)和沉降为:A, 1700 CE(1.1±0.5 m);B, 942-764 cal a BP(0.7±0.4 m和1.0 m±0.4 m);和D, 1568-1361 cal a BP (1.0 m±0.4 m)。与其他卡斯卡迪亚遗址的年龄相比,接触沉降及其模拟年龄的重叠程度与数百公里长的巨型逆冲断裂一致。但这些数据不能决定性地区分Nehalem河河口三次大地震接触记录的不同类型或长度的破裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Quaternary
Open Quaternary Social Sciences-Archeology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信