Tax Implications on Financial Instruments Resulting From IFRS 9 Adoption in Indonesia

Prianto Budi Saptono, Ismail Khozen
{"title":"Tax Implications on Financial Instruments Resulting From IFRS 9 Adoption in Indonesia","authors":"Prianto Budi Saptono, Ismail Khozen","doi":"10.22219/jrak.v11i3.16157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the tax implications of financial instruments after International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 9 adoption in Indonesia into Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 71 (PSAK 71). To gain an in-depth understanding regarding the implementation of PSAK 71, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with policymakers, PSAK standard setters, academicians, tax consultants, and taxpayers. We also used case studies related to the convergence of IFRS 9 to identify the tax implications of implementing the new standard. The results show that the entities applying PSAK 71 generally measure and recognize financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value. Besides, they use amortized costs in specific conditions. However, current tax regulations relevant to financial instruments still refer to the acquisition cost following Article 10 of the Income Tax Law. Accordingly, the gains or losses in respect of financial instruments are not recognizable for tax purposes. Although fiscal correction has proven to be a panacea for bridging the gap between taxation and accounting standards, policymakers urgently need to revise the outdated regulations to provide taxpayers with legal certainty and ease of administration. The significant contribution of this study is the attempt to link the accounting and taxation aspect of financial instruments with the setting of Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":52995,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v11i3.16157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the tax implications of financial instruments after International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 9 adoption in Indonesia into Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 71 (PSAK 71). To gain an in-depth understanding regarding the implementation of PSAK 71, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with policymakers, PSAK standard setters, academicians, tax consultants, and taxpayers. We also used case studies related to the convergence of IFRS 9 to identify the tax implications of implementing the new standard. The results show that the entities applying PSAK 71 generally measure and recognize financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value. Besides, they use amortized costs in specific conditions. However, current tax regulations relevant to financial instruments still refer to the acquisition cost following Article 10 of the Income Tax Law. Accordingly, the gains or losses in respect of financial instruments are not recognizable for tax purposes. Although fiscal correction has proven to be a panacea for bridging the gap between taxation and accounting standards, policymakers urgently need to revise the outdated regulations to provide taxpayers with legal certainty and ease of administration. The significant contribution of this study is the attempt to link the accounting and taxation aspect of financial instruments with the setting of Indonesia.
印尼采用IFRS 9对金融工具的税务影响
本研究旨在分析国际财务报告准则(IFRS)9在印度尼西亚被纳入财务会计准则71报表(PSAK 71)后金融工具的税务影响。为了深入了解PSAK 71的实施情况,我们对政策制定者、PSAK标准制定者、学者、税务顾问和纳税人进行了半结构化的深入采访。我们还使用了与IFRS 9趋同相关的案例研究,以确定实施新标准的税务影响。结果表明,采用PSAK 71的实体通常以公允价值计量和确认金融资产或金融负债。此外,他们在特定情况下使用摊余成本。然而,现行与金融工具相关的税收法规仍然适用于《所得税法》第10条规定的收购成本。因此,金融工具的收益或损失不可用于税收目的。尽管财政调整已被证明是弥合税收和会计准则之间差距的灵丹妙药,但政策制定者迫切需要修订过时的法规,为纳税人提供法律确定性和管理便利。本研究的重要贡献是试图将金融工具的会计和税务方面与印度尼西亚的环境联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信