Accuracy of high resolution coastal flow speed simulations during and outside of wind, wave and stratification events (Gulf of Lion, NW Mediterranean)

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Elise Vissenaekens , Katell Guizien , Xavier Durrieu de Madron , Ivane Pairaud , Yann Leredde , Pere Puig , François Bourrin
{"title":"Accuracy of high resolution coastal flow speed simulations during and outside of wind, wave and stratification events (Gulf of Lion, NW Mediterranean)","authors":"Elise Vissenaekens ,&nbsp;Katell Guizien ,&nbsp;Xavier Durrieu de Madron ,&nbsp;Ivane Pairaud ,&nbsp;Yann Leredde ,&nbsp;Pere Puig ,&nbsp;François Bourrin","doi":"10.1016/j.jmarsys.2022.103845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurately predicting the flow speed is crucial for applications of coastal ocean circulation simulations such as sediment, larval or contaminant dispersal. This study aims to assess the accuracy of simulated flow speed in a coastal circulation model in comparison with field observations. Deviation between simulated and observed flow speed was assessed in four shallow, coastal locations and four deep, offshore locations in the Gulf of Lion (NW Mediterranean Sea) using six indicators (bias, relative bias, root mean square error, Hanna &amp; Heinold index, correlation and scatter index). Statistical distributions of indicators were calculated during reference periods with low wind, no waves and no stratification. During these periods, relative bias indicated the model displayed a higher performance in predicting transport at shallow stations than at deep stations probably due to grid refinement at these stations. However, there was a low correlation between simulated and observed flow speed, indicating short term time/space mismatches, at all stations during reference periods. Indicators were then calculated during three types of events (wind, waves and stratification) when model assumptions were expected to be violated and their corresponding probability during reference periods indicated that neither wind, wave nor stratification events worsens model’s performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924796322001464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately predicting the flow speed is crucial for applications of coastal ocean circulation simulations such as sediment, larval or contaminant dispersal. This study aims to assess the accuracy of simulated flow speed in a coastal circulation model in comparison with field observations. Deviation between simulated and observed flow speed was assessed in four shallow, coastal locations and four deep, offshore locations in the Gulf of Lion (NW Mediterranean Sea) using six indicators (bias, relative bias, root mean square error, Hanna & Heinold index, correlation and scatter index). Statistical distributions of indicators were calculated during reference periods with low wind, no waves and no stratification. During these periods, relative bias indicated the model displayed a higher performance in predicting transport at shallow stations than at deep stations probably due to grid refinement at these stations. However, there was a low correlation between simulated and observed flow speed, indicating short term time/space mismatches, at all stations during reference periods. Indicators were then calculated during three types of events (wind, waves and stratification) when model assumptions were expected to be violated and their corresponding probability during reference periods indicated that neither wind, wave nor stratification events worsens model’s performance.

风、波浪和分层事件期间和外部的高分辨率海岸流速模拟的准确性(狮子湾,地中海西北部)
准确预测流速对于沉积物、幼虫或污染物扩散等沿海海洋环流模拟的应用至关重要。本研究旨在评估海岸环流模型中模拟流速与现场观测结果的准确性。使用六个指标(偏差、相对偏差、均方根误差、Hanna&;Heinold指数、相关性和分散指数)评估了狮子湾(地中海西北部)四个浅水海岸位置和四个深水近海位置的模拟流速和观测流速之间的偏差。指标的统计分布是在低风、无波浪和无分层的参考期内计算的。在这些时期,相对偏差表明,该模型在预测浅层站点的传输方面比深层站点表现出更高的性能,这可能是由于这些站点的网格细化。然而,在参考期内,所有站点的模拟流速和观测流速之间的相关性较低,表明存在短期时间/空间失配。然后,在三种类型的事件(风、波浪和分层)期间计算指标,当预计违反模型假设时,它们在参考期内的相应概率表明,风、波浪或分层事件都不会恶化模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Systems
Journal of Marine Systems 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Marine Systems provides a medium for interdisciplinary exchange between physical, chemical and biological oceanographers and marine geologists. The journal welcomes original research papers and review articles. Preference will be given to interdisciplinary approaches to marine systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信