Safety and Effectiveness of Transthoracic Core Needle Biopsy in a Newly Established Interventional Radiology Program in Tanzania

E. Mbuguje, J. Alswang, I. Rukundo, A. Naif, Fabian M Laage Gaupp, V. Ramalingam, M. Asch
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Transthoracic Core Needle Biopsy in a Newly Established Interventional Radiology Program in Tanzania","authors":"E. Mbuguje, J. Alswang, I. Rukundo, A. Naif, Fabian M Laage Gaupp, V. Ramalingam, M. Asch","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1742220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Transthoracic core needle biopsy (TTCNB) became a routinely offered procedure in Tanzania in October 2018. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of establishing a TTCNB program in a resource-limited setting.\n Methodology A single center, prospective, observational cohort study was conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital on 90 patients who underwent computed tomography-guided TTCNB from October 2018 to May 2021. Patient and procedural data, including demographic information, complications, pathology results, and clinical outcomes, were stored in a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database. Follow-up was conducted at 4 weeks postprocedure by phone. Descriptive analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences.\n Results A total of 90 patients underwent TTCNB. Seven samples were lost or never processed. In total, 68/83 (81.9%) of processed samples were diagnostic, with 89.7% (n = 61) classified as malignant and 10.3% (n = 7) classified as benign. Overall, 82.4% (n = 56) were classified as primary malignancies, 7.4% (n = 5) as metastatic malignancies, 5.9% (n = 4) as benign tumors, and 4.4% (n = 3) as infectious. Reasons for nondiagnostic samples were crashed/insufficient samples in 53.3% (n = 8) and nonspecific chronic inflammation in 46.7% (n = 7). Minor (Society of Interventional Radiology [SIR] class A and B) complications occurred in 8 cases (8.9%), while there was 1 (1.1%) major complication (SIR class F). A total of 44/90 (48.9%) patients could be reached for follow-up at 4 weeks postprocedure. In addition, 31/44 (70.5%) of these patients had a diagnosis of malignancy. Of these, 20 received chemotherapy, 8 died prior to receiving any treatment, 2 declined any further medical or surgical intervention, and 1 was treated with surgical excision and adjuvant chemotherapy.\n Conclusion Although recently introduced in Tanzania, TTCNB has been performed with 81.9% diagnostic accuracy and a complication rate comparable to existing literature.","PeriodicalId":32940,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Transthoracic core needle biopsy (TTCNB) became a routinely offered procedure in Tanzania in October 2018. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of establishing a TTCNB program in a resource-limited setting. Methodology A single center, prospective, observational cohort study was conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital on 90 patients who underwent computed tomography-guided TTCNB from October 2018 to May 2021. Patient and procedural data, including demographic information, complications, pathology results, and clinical outcomes, were stored in a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database. Follow-up was conducted at 4 weeks postprocedure by phone. Descriptive analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Results A total of 90 patients underwent TTCNB. Seven samples were lost or never processed. In total, 68/83 (81.9%) of processed samples were diagnostic, with 89.7% (n = 61) classified as malignant and 10.3% (n = 7) classified as benign. Overall, 82.4% (n = 56) were classified as primary malignancies, 7.4% (n = 5) as metastatic malignancies, 5.9% (n = 4) as benign tumors, and 4.4% (n = 3) as infectious. Reasons for nondiagnostic samples were crashed/insufficient samples in 53.3% (n = 8) and nonspecific chronic inflammation in 46.7% (n = 7). Minor (Society of Interventional Radiology [SIR] class A and B) complications occurred in 8 cases (8.9%), while there was 1 (1.1%) major complication (SIR class F). A total of 44/90 (48.9%) patients could be reached for follow-up at 4 weeks postprocedure. In addition, 31/44 (70.5%) of these patients had a diagnosis of malignancy. Of these, 20 received chemotherapy, 8 died prior to receiving any treatment, 2 declined any further medical or surgical intervention, and 1 was treated with surgical excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion Although recently introduced in Tanzania, TTCNB has been performed with 81.9% diagnostic accuracy and a complication rate comparable to existing literature.
在坦桑尼亚新建立的介入放射学项目中经胸核心穿刺活检的安全性和有效性
背景 2018年10月,经胸核心针活检(TTCNB)成为坦桑尼亚的常规手术。本研究评估了在资源有限的环境中建立TTCNB项目的安全性和有效性。方法论 Muhimbili国立医院对2018年10月至2021年5月接受计算机断层扫描引导的TTCNB的90名患者进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。患者和手术数据,包括人口统计信息、并发症、病理学结果和临床结果,存储在研究电子数据捕获(REDCap)数据库中。术后4周通过电话进行随访。使用社会科学统计软件包进行描述性分析。后果 共有90名患者接受了TTCNB。七个样本丢失或从未处理过。总的来说,68/83(81.9%)的处理样本是诊断性的,其中89.7%(n = 61)为恶性,10.3%(n = 7) 分类为良性。总体而言,82.4%(n = 56)被归类为原发性恶性肿瘤,7.4%(n = 5) 作为转移性恶性肿瘤,5.9%(n = 4) 良性肿瘤占4.4%(n = 3) 具有传染性。53.3%(n = 8) 非特异性慢性炎症46.7%(n = 7) 。8例(8.9%)发生轻微(介入放射学学会[SIR]A级和B级)并发症,1例(1.1%)发生主要并发症(SIR F级)。术后4周,共有44/90(48.9%)患者可以接受随访。此外,这些患者中有31/44(70.5%)被诊断为恶性肿瘤。其中,20人接受了化疗,8人在接受任何治疗前死亡,2人拒绝接受任何进一步的医疗或手术干预,1人接受了手术切除和辅助化疗。结论 尽管最近在坦桑尼亚引入了TTCNB,但其诊断准确率为81.9%,并发症发生率与现有文献相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信