Samuel Bonet Olivencia, Sudeep Hegde, F. Sasangohar
{"title":"A multi-level stakeholder-centered approach to investigate unnecessary readmissions in emergency departments","authors":"Samuel Bonet Olivencia, Sudeep Hegde, F. Sasangohar","doi":"10.1080/24725579.2020.1834033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Unnecessary readmissions have become a recurring problem in the Emergency Departments (ED) across the United States. While the current knowledge on the contributors to this problem is dominated by patient-level factors, an understanding of more diverse perspectives across the healthcare organization is needed. This research study provides a multi-level stakeholder-centered view of the problem of readmissions in EDs. Interviews were conducted with 12 relevant stakeholders at different levels of the hierarchy of a representative U.S. healthcare system, including senior leadership, clinical management, and front-line patient care. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify factors that contribute to unnecessary readmissions, and potential strategies to reduce readmissions. The findings revealed eleven potential factors that may contribute to unnecessary ED readmission, including culture, resources constraints, and locality-based factors, among others. Ten potential strategies to reduce readmissions were derived from the interview analysis including, centralized and accessible information, patient education, and coordination with local clinics, among others. Further, a thematic mapping was created to connect the identified factors to the potential strategies. Findings reveal a complex relationship between readmission factors and reduction strategies. Further investigation is needed to validate these findings and to integrate and implement these strategies as bundled interventions in practice.","PeriodicalId":37744,"journal":{"name":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"24 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24725579.2020.1834033","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2020.1834033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Unnecessary readmissions have become a recurring problem in the Emergency Departments (ED) across the United States. While the current knowledge on the contributors to this problem is dominated by patient-level factors, an understanding of more diverse perspectives across the healthcare organization is needed. This research study provides a multi-level stakeholder-centered view of the problem of readmissions in EDs. Interviews were conducted with 12 relevant stakeholders at different levels of the hierarchy of a representative U.S. healthcare system, including senior leadership, clinical management, and front-line patient care. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify factors that contribute to unnecessary readmissions, and potential strategies to reduce readmissions. The findings revealed eleven potential factors that may contribute to unnecessary ED readmission, including culture, resources constraints, and locality-based factors, among others. Ten potential strategies to reduce readmissions were derived from the interview analysis including, centralized and accessible information, patient education, and coordination with local clinics, among others. Further, a thematic mapping was created to connect the identified factors to the potential strategies. Findings reveal a complex relationship between readmission factors and reduction strategies. Further investigation is needed to validate these findings and to integrate and implement these strategies as bundled interventions in practice.
期刊介绍:
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering aims to foster the healthcare systems community by publishing high quality papers that have a strong methodological focus and direct applicability to healthcare systems. Published quarterly, the journal supports research that explores: · Healthcare Operations Management · Medical Decision Making · Socio-Technical Systems Analysis related to healthcare · Quality Engineering · Healthcare Informatics · Healthcare Policy We are looking forward to accepting submissions that document the development and use of industrial and systems engineering tools and techniques including: · Healthcare operations research · Healthcare statistics · Healthcare information systems · Healthcare work measurement · Human factors/ergonomics applied to healthcare systems Research that explores the integration of these tools and techniques with those from other engineering and medical disciplines are also featured. We encourage the submission of clinical notes, or practice notes, to show the impact of contributions that will be published. We also encourage authors to collect an impact statement from their clinical partners to show the impact of research in the clinical practices.