A multi-level stakeholder-centered approach to investigate unnecessary readmissions in emergency departments

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Samuel Bonet Olivencia, Sudeep Hegde, F. Sasangohar
{"title":"A multi-level stakeholder-centered approach to investigate unnecessary readmissions in emergency departments","authors":"Samuel Bonet Olivencia, Sudeep Hegde, F. Sasangohar","doi":"10.1080/24725579.2020.1834033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Unnecessary readmissions have become a recurring problem in the Emergency Departments (ED) across the United States. While the current knowledge on the contributors to this problem is dominated by patient-level factors, an understanding of more diverse perspectives across the healthcare organization is needed. This research study provides a multi-level stakeholder-centered view of the problem of readmissions in EDs. Interviews were conducted with 12 relevant stakeholders at different levels of the hierarchy of a representative U.S. healthcare system, including senior leadership, clinical management, and front-line patient care. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify factors that contribute to unnecessary readmissions, and potential strategies to reduce readmissions. The findings revealed eleven potential factors that may contribute to unnecessary ED readmission, including culture, resources constraints, and locality-based factors, among others. Ten potential strategies to reduce readmissions were derived from the interview analysis including, centralized and accessible information, patient education, and coordination with local clinics, among others. Further, a thematic mapping was created to connect the identified factors to the potential strategies. Findings reveal a complex relationship between readmission factors and reduction strategies. Further investigation is needed to validate these findings and to integrate and implement these strategies as bundled interventions in practice.","PeriodicalId":37744,"journal":{"name":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"24 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24725579.2020.1834033","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2020.1834033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Unnecessary readmissions have become a recurring problem in the Emergency Departments (ED) across the United States. While the current knowledge on the contributors to this problem is dominated by patient-level factors, an understanding of more diverse perspectives across the healthcare organization is needed. This research study provides a multi-level stakeholder-centered view of the problem of readmissions in EDs. Interviews were conducted with 12 relevant stakeholders at different levels of the hierarchy of a representative U.S. healthcare system, including senior leadership, clinical management, and front-line patient care. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify factors that contribute to unnecessary readmissions, and potential strategies to reduce readmissions. The findings revealed eleven potential factors that may contribute to unnecessary ED readmission, including culture, resources constraints, and locality-based factors, among others. Ten potential strategies to reduce readmissions were derived from the interview analysis including, centralized and accessible information, patient education, and coordination with local clinics, among others. Further, a thematic mapping was created to connect the identified factors to the potential strategies. Findings reveal a complex relationship between readmission factors and reduction strategies. Further investigation is needed to validate these findings and to integrate and implement these strategies as bundled interventions in practice.
一个多层次的以利益相关者为中心的方法来调查急诊部门不必要的再入院
不必要的再入院已成为美国急诊科(ED)反复出现的问题。虽然目前对导致该问题的因素的了解主要是由患者层面的因素决定的,但需要了解整个医疗保健组织的更多样化的观点。本研究提供了一个以利益相关者为中心的多层次视角来看待急诊再入院问题。采访了12位来自美国代表性医疗保健系统不同层次的相关利益相关者,包括高级领导、临床管理和一线患者护理。进行了专题分析,以确定导致不必要再入院的因素,以及减少再入院的潜在策略。研究结果揭示了11个可能导致不必要的急诊再入院的潜在因素,包括文化、资源限制和基于地点的因素等。访谈分析得出了减少再入院的10个潜在策略,包括集中和可获取信息、患者教育以及与当地诊所的协调等。此外,还编制了专题地图,将已确定的因素与潜在战略联系起来。研究结果揭示了再入院因素与减少策略之间的复杂关系。需要进一步的调查来验证这些发现,并在实践中将这些战略作为捆绑干预措施加以整合和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering aims to foster the healthcare systems community by publishing high quality papers that have a strong methodological focus and direct applicability to healthcare systems. Published quarterly, the journal supports research that explores: · Healthcare Operations Management · Medical Decision Making · Socio-Technical Systems Analysis related to healthcare · Quality Engineering · Healthcare Informatics · Healthcare Policy We are looking forward to accepting submissions that document the development and use of industrial and systems engineering tools and techniques including: · Healthcare operations research · Healthcare statistics · Healthcare information systems · Healthcare work measurement · Human factors/ergonomics applied to healthcare systems Research that explores the integration of these tools and techniques with those from other engineering and medical disciplines are also featured. We encourage the submission of clinical notes, or practice notes, to show the impact of contributions that will be published. We also encourage authors to collect an impact statement from their clinical partners to show the impact of research in the clinical practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书