Negotiating the coexistence of mining and pastoralism in Mongolia

IF 2.6 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Byambajav Dalaibuyan
{"title":"Negotiating the coexistence of mining and pastoralism in Mongolia","authors":"Byambajav Dalaibuyan","doi":"10.1080/24761028.2021.2021356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction The relationship between mining developments and local communities has been highly contested. The role of the local population in Mongolia, which is largely comprised of herder households and communities, has not been adequately recognized in government mining policy and regulations. Since 2006, mining project proponents are required to establish local level agreements (LLAs) with local host governments in Mongolia. Objective This paper examines how agreement mechanisms have been implemented and whether they have helped local communities protect their interests while coexisting with mining. Methods The paper draws on a multi-year study on LLAs in Mongolia carried out by the author between 2013 - 2018. Results As the Mongolian case demonstrates, legal prescription by itself will not deliver the desired outcomes of greater benefits for local communities or improved relations between these communities and developers. The negotiation of coexistence of mining and pastoralism requires iterative, multilayered processes involving the communities affected by the project. Unless the rights and claims of project-affected pastoral communities are recognized in the LLA regulations, their meaningful participation in agreement-making will remain limited.","PeriodicalId":37218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"46 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2021.2021356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The relationship between mining developments and local communities has been highly contested. The role of the local population in Mongolia, which is largely comprised of herder households and communities, has not been adequately recognized in government mining policy and regulations. Since 2006, mining project proponents are required to establish local level agreements (LLAs) with local host governments in Mongolia. Objective This paper examines how agreement mechanisms have been implemented and whether they have helped local communities protect their interests while coexisting with mining. Methods The paper draws on a multi-year study on LLAs in Mongolia carried out by the author between 2013 - 2018. Results As the Mongolian case demonstrates, legal prescription by itself will not deliver the desired outcomes of greater benefits for local communities or improved relations between these communities and developers. The negotiation of coexistence of mining and pastoralism requires iterative, multilayered processes involving the communities affected by the project. Unless the rights and claims of project-affected pastoral communities are recognized in the LLA regulations, their meaningful participation in agreement-making will remain limited.
蒙古国矿业与畜牧业共存的谈判
摘要简介采矿业发展与当地社区之间的关系一直备受争议。蒙古当地人口主要由牧民家庭和社区组成,其作用在政府采矿政策和法规中没有得到充分承认。自2006年以来,采矿项目的支持者必须与蒙古的地方东道国政府签订地方层面的协议。目的探讨协议机制是如何实施的,以及它们是否有助于当地社区在与采矿共存的同时保护自己的利益。方法利用作者在2013-2018年间对蒙古LLAs进行的多年研究。结果正如蒙古的案例所表明的那样,法律规定本身并不能为当地社区带来更大的利益或改善这些社区与开发商之间的关系。矿业和畜牧业共存的谈判需要涉及受项目影响的社区的迭代、多层次的过程。除非受项目影响的牧民社区的权利和主张在LLA条例中得到承认,否则他们对协议制定的有意义的参与将仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies
Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信