{"title":"Apocalypse in Crisis: Fiction from The War of the Worlds to Dead Astronauts by Christopher Palmer (review)","authors":"Connor M Pitetti","doi":"10.1353/sfs.2022.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moylan returns us to Ruth Levitas, her formulation of utopian method, and how it rubs against Frederick Jameson’s skepticism that the future is imaginable. Jameson admits that we can see possibilities but draws the line at the efficacy of the fully formed programs constructed by classical utopianism. The utopian impulse, in his analysis, is something that always fails closure. Moylan points out that Levitas rises to Jameson’s challenge with a “radical positivity” that goes beyond the moment of utopian negation (which Nietzsche would reject as the pathway to nihilism) to exploiting the utopian remnant or surplus in any political program. The goal is to realize “a better way of living” that is at variance with the way the world is now (189). With Moylan at hand, perhaps we can imagine and achieve the future after all.—De Witt Douglas Kilgore, Indiana University","PeriodicalId":45553,"journal":{"name":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","volume":"49 1","pages":"580 - 582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sfs.2022.0062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Moylan returns us to Ruth Levitas, her formulation of utopian method, and how it rubs against Frederick Jameson’s skepticism that the future is imaginable. Jameson admits that we can see possibilities but draws the line at the efficacy of the fully formed programs constructed by classical utopianism. The utopian impulse, in his analysis, is something that always fails closure. Moylan points out that Levitas rises to Jameson’s challenge with a “radical positivity” that goes beyond the moment of utopian negation (which Nietzsche would reject as the pathway to nihilism) to exploiting the utopian remnant or surplus in any political program. The goal is to realize “a better way of living” that is at variance with the way the world is now (189). With Moylan at hand, perhaps we can imagine and achieve the future after all.—De Witt Douglas Kilgore, Indiana University
莫伊兰让我们回到了鲁思·莱维塔斯,她对乌托邦方法的阐述,以及它如何与弗雷德里克·詹姆森对未来是可以想象的怀疑相冲突。詹姆森承认,我们可以看到可能性,但对古典乌托邦主义构建的完整程序的效力划清界限。在他的分析中,乌托邦式的冲动总是无法结束。莫伊兰指出,莱维塔斯以一种“激进的积极性”迎接詹姆逊的挑战,这种积极性超越了乌托邦式否定的时刻(尼采会拒绝这种否定,认为这是通往虚无主义的道路),而在任何政治计划中都会利用乌托邦式的残余或盈余。目标是实现“一种与现在世界不同的更好的生活方式”(189)。莫依兰在身边,也许我们可以想象并实现未来--De Witt Douglas Kilgore,印第安纳大学