Raumordnerische Steuerungstypen der wohnbaulichen Siedlungsentwicklung in Deutschland. Eine bundesweite Analyse der eingesetzten Planungsinstrumente in allen deutschen Planungsregionen

IF 0.7 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
David Pehlke
{"title":"Raumordnerische Steuerungstypen der wohnbaulichen Siedlungsentwicklung in Deutschland. Eine bundesweite Analyse der eingesetzten Planungsinstrumente in allen deutschen Planungsregionen","authors":"David Pehlke","doi":"10.14512/rur.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The steering of the residential development on the regional level is one of the major tasks of regional planning. Nevertheless, no nationwide information is yet available on the implementation of the planning instruments in regional plans. Moreover, for potential steering types, only one approach on the level of the German federal states exists. To reduce this information deficit, a plan content analysis is used to determine which positive planning instruments were implemented in the state development plans and regional plans valid in 2017. The data basis for negative planning instruments is the spatial development plan monitor of the Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBSR). With these data, a non-linear principal component analysis and a cluster analysis is carried out to identify specific steering types. As a result, six regional planning steering types of pre-use planning, quantitative control, settlement axes, positive planning location control, intra-municipal framework with extensive mono-functional open space protection and extensive location control through multifunctional open space protection can be identified. The different steering types are often spatially clustered, so that a significant influence of state planning requirements can be assumed.","PeriodicalId":45221,"journal":{"name":"Raumforschung und Raumordnung-Spatial Research and Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Raumforschung und Raumordnung-Spatial Research and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The steering of the residential development on the regional level is one of the major tasks of regional planning. Nevertheless, no nationwide information is yet available on the implementation of the planning instruments in regional plans. Moreover, for potential steering types, only one approach on the level of the German federal states exists. To reduce this information deficit, a plan content analysis is used to determine which positive planning instruments were implemented in the state development plans and regional plans valid in 2017. The data basis for negative planning instruments is the spatial development plan monitor of the Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBSR). With these data, a non-linear principal component analysis and a cluster analysis is carried out to identify specific steering types. As a result, six regional planning steering types of pre-use planning, quantitative control, settlement axes, positive planning location control, intra-municipal framework with extensive mono-functional open space protection and extensive location control through multifunctional open space protection can be identified. The different steering types are often spatially clustered, so that a significant influence of state planning requirements can be assumed.
德国住房构造开发的标准我希望您可以在整个德国的规划工具上得到一个统一的分析
区域规划的主要任务之一是在区域层面上指导住宅发展。然而,目前还没有关于区域计划中规划手段执行情况的全国性资料。此外,对于潜在的转向类型,在德国联邦州的层面上只有一种方法存在。为了减少这种信息缺失,我们使用规划内容分析来确定哪些积极的规划工具在2017年有效的国家发展规划和区域规划中得到了实施。负面规划工具的数据基础是联邦建筑和区域规划局(BBSR)的空间发展计划监测。利用这些数据,进行非线性主成分分析和聚类分析,以确定具体的转向类型。从而确定了利用前规划、数量控制、聚落轴、正向规划区位控制、广泛保护单一功能开放空间的城市内部框架和通过多功能开放空间保护进行广泛区位控制的六大区域规划导向类型。不同的转向类型通常在空间上聚集在一起,因此可以假设国家规划要求的重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信